Abstract
Academia and practice increasingly stress the importance of partnerships and collaboration to successfully solve social issues, as evidenced through the UN Sustainable Development Goals, proliferation of cross-sector partnerships, and vast numbers of private governance initiatives. While partnerships have been seemingly positioned as the silver bullet to addressing society’s “wicked problems”, they also create their own challenges. Partnerships may be fraught with power asymmetries, ulterior motives, dysfunctional operations, and blurred boundaries. Yet, research to date has either focused on the positive aspects of partnerships, or relied upon Resource Dependence Theory
(RDT) to explain partnerships as primarily an exchange of resources. This paper argues that this is an overly-simplistic view of cross-sector partnerships which does not fully reflect the complexities of partnerships across sectors, nor considers the dynamic environment of rapidly-changing roles, responsibilities and institutions in which the partnerships are situated. It therefore draws upon institutional theory to help explain and understand how changes in actors’ institutional environments impact dynamics both within and between partner organizations. It utilizes RDT and institutional theory to theorize about the role of differing values, logics and motivations between partners; the dual friendand-foe dynamics (“frenemies”) which require concurrent management of contradictory relationship terms; and the manifestation of power asymmetries between partners, particular related to the “power of the purse strings”. The paper’s contribution is to highlight the existence and influence of the inherent tensions between business and NGO actors in the context of evolving roles in a globalized world by investigating how these affect dynamics and working relationships both between and within partner organizations.
(RDT) to explain partnerships as primarily an exchange of resources. This paper argues that this is an overly-simplistic view of cross-sector partnerships which does not fully reflect the complexities of partnerships across sectors, nor considers the dynamic environment of rapidly-changing roles, responsibilities and institutions in which the partnerships are situated. It therefore draws upon institutional theory to help explain and understand how changes in actors’ institutional environments impact dynamics both within and between partner organizations. It utilizes RDT and institutional theory to theorize about the role of differing values, logics and motivations between partners; the dual friendand-foe dynamics (“frenemies”) which require concurrent management of contradictory relationship terms; and the manifestation of power asymmetries between partners, particular related to the “power of the purse strings”. The paper’s contribution is to highlight the existence and influence of the inherent tensions between business and NGO actors in the context of evolving roles in a globalized world by investigating how these affect dynamics and working relationships both between and within partner organizations.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Publication date | 2017 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Publication status | Published - 2017 |
Event | 5th CR3+ Conference: Making Corporate Responsibility Useful - Hanken School of Economics, Helsinki, Finland Duration: 28 Apr 2017 → 29 Apr 2017 Conference number: 5 |
Conference
Conference | 5th CR3+ Conference |
---|---|
Number | 5 |
Location | Hanken School of Economics |
Country/Territory | Finland |
City | Helsinki |
Period | 28/04/2017 → 29/04/2017 |
Keywords
- Partnerships
- Cross-sector social partnerships
- Corporate social responsibility
- Resource dependence theory
- Institutional theory