Fiscal State-citizen Alignment: Tracing the Sociohistorical Conditions of the Financial Crisis

Tim Holst Celik

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    122 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The 2008 crisis ended the growth bubble of the 2000s, which Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) governments facilitated through the normative/political-regulatory promotion of household indebtedness. Historically contextualizing this state-citizen relationship, this article maps out four episodes of sovereign fiscalism, namely, debt-taking in the Italian city-states, the making of the absolutist tax/fiscal state, the eighteenth/nineteenth century elaboration of the economic citizen, and the postwar era of managed capitalism. Finally, it applies this framework to the 2008 crisis and the larger post-1970s politico-economic constellation. The crisis can be perceived as a particular articulation of an age-old state-household dynamic—a dialectical alignment of the mode of fiscal state-crafting with the ethos of the state-citizen nexus—characterized by a heightened fiscal attentiveness to ordinary consumer-citizens. By uncovering the sociohistorical conditions governing the dominant precrisis regime, it not only nuances our understanding of the crisis but also of neoliberalism and suggests the implausibility of returning to “Golden Age” democratic capitalism.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalCritical Historical Studies
    Volume3
    Issue number1
    Pages (from-to)105-141
    ISSN2326-4462
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Bibliographical note

    CBS Library does not have access to the material

    Cite this

    @article{75e8cfcd21f24cc18cc09ee14d355c12,
    title = "Fiscal State-citizen Alignment: Tracing the Sociohistorical Conditions of the Financial Crisis",
    abstract = "The 2008 crisis ended the growth bubble of the 2000s, which Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) governments facilitated through the normative/political-regulatory promotion of household indebtedness. Historically contextualizing this state-citizen relationship, this article maps out four episodes of sovereign fiscalism, namely, debt-taking in the Italian city-states, the making of the absolutist tax/fiscal state, the eighteenth/nineteenth century elaboration of the economic citizen, and the postwar era of managed capitalism. Finally, it applies this framework to the 2008 crisis and the larger post-1970s politico-economic constellation. The crisis can be perceived as a particular articulation of an age-old state-household dynamic—a dialectical alignment of the mode of fiscal state-crafting with the ethos of the state-citizen nexus—characterized by a heightened fiscal attentiveness to ordinary consumer-citizens. By uncovering the sociohistorical conditions governing the dominant precrisis regime, it not only nuances our understanding of the crisis but also of neoliberalism and suggests the implausibility of returning to “Golden Age” democratic capitalism.",
    author = "Celik, {Tim Holst}",
    note = "CBS Library does not have access to the material",
    year = "2016",
    doi = "10.1086/685555",
    language = "English",
    volume = "3",
    pages = "105--141",
    journal = "Critical Historical Studies",
    issn = "2326-4462",
    publisher = "University of Chicago Press",
    number = "1",

    }

    Fiscal State-citizen Alignment : Tracing the Sociohistorical Conditions of the Financial Crisis. / Celik, Tim Holst.

    In: Critical Historical Studies, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2016, p. 105-141.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Fiscal State-citizen Alignment

    T2 - Tracing the Sociohistorical Conditions of the Financial Crisis

    AU - Celik, Tim Holst

    N1 - CBS Library does not have access to the material

    PY - 2016

    Y1 - 2016

    N2 - The 2008 crisis ended the growth bubble of the 2000s, which Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) governments facilitated through the normative/political-regulatory promotion of household indebtedness. Historically contextualizing this state-citizen relationship, this article maps out four episodes of sovereign fiscalism, namely, debt-taking in the Italian city-states, the making of the absolutist tax/fiscal state, the eighteenth/nineteenth century elaboration of the economic citizen, and the postwar era of managed capitalism. Finally, it applies this framework to the 2008 crisis and the larger post-1970s politico-economic constellation. The crisis can be perceived as a particular articulation of an age-old state-household dynamic—a dialectical alignment of the mode of fiscal state-crafting with the ethos of the state-citizen nexus—characterized by a heightened fiscal attentiveness to ordinary consumer-citizens. By uncovering the sociohistorical conditions governing the dominant precrisis regime, it not only nuances our understanding of the crisis but also of neoliberalism and suggests the implausibility of returning to “Golden Age” democratic capitalism.

    AB - The 2008 crisis ended the growth bubble of the 2000s, which Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) governments facilitated through the normative/political-regulatory promotion of household indebtedness. Historically contextualizing this state-citizen relationship, this article maps out four episodes of sovereign fiscalism, namely, debt-taking in the Italian city-states, the making of the absolutist tax/fiscal state, the eighteenth/nineteenth century elaboration of the economic citizen, and the postwar era of managed capitalism. Finally, it applies this framework to the 2008 crisis and the larger post-1970s politico-economic constellation. The crisis can be perceived as a particular articulation of an age-old state-household dynamic—a dialectical alignment of the mode of fiscal state-crafting with the ethos of the state-citizen nexus—characterized by a heightened fiscal attentiveness to ordinary consumer-citizens. By uncovering the sociohistorical conditions governing the dominant precrisis regime, it not only nuances our understanding of the crisis but also of neoliberalism and suggests the implausibility of returning to “Golden Age” democratic capitalism.

    U2 - 10.1086/685555

    DO - 10.1086/685555

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 3

    SP - 105

    EP - 141

    JO - Critical Historical Studies

    JF - Critical Historical Studies

    SN - 2326-4462

    IS - 1

    ER -