Finance beyond Function: Three Causal Explanations for Financialization

Aaron Z. Pitluck, Fabio Mattioli, Daniel Souleles

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This article suggests that it is advantageous for social scientists to deliberately depart from functionalist theories seeking to explain the expansion of financial instruments and logics across social life. Rather, we identify three causes of financialization from three extant clusters of scholastic activity: an organic political economy that sees finance expanding as a product or by‐product of larger state‐ and imperial‐level political struggles, a relational sociology that sees the ways that finance expands by becoming another medium for expressing and constraining social relationships, and a cultural analysis that observes the increasing redefinition of discursive and material practices as financial. Across this larger discussion, we introduce and situate the contributions to this journal's special issue on financialization.
Original languageEnglish
JournalEconomic Anthropology
Volume5
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)157-171
Number of pages15
ISSN2330-4847
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2018

Keywords

  • Financialization
  • Functionalism
  • Political economy
  • Performativity
  • Relational sociology

Cite this

Pitluck, Aaron Z. ; Mattioli, Fabio ; Souleles, Daniel. / Finance beyond Function : Three Causal Explanations for Financialization. In: Economic Anthropology. 2018 ; Vol. 5, No. 2. pp. 157-171.
@article{cc181209bf7c494f9267eda479e9a1da,
title = "Finance beyond Function: Three Causal Explanations for Financialization",
abstract = "This article suggests that it is advantageous for social scientists to deliberately depart from functionalist theories seeking to explain the expansion of financial instruments and logics across social life. Rather, we identify three causes of financialization from three extant clusters of scholastic activity: an organic political economy that sees finance expanding as a product or by‐product of larger state‐ and imperial‐level political struggles, a relational sociology that sees the ways that finance expands by becoming another medium for expressing and constraining social relationships, and a cultural analysis that observes the increasing redefinition of discursive and material practices as financial. Across this larger discussion, we introduce and situate the contributions to this journal's special issue on financialization.",
keywords = "Financialization, Functionalism, Political economy, Performativity, Relational sociology, Financialization, Functionalism, Political economy, Performativity, Relational sociology",
author = "Pitluck, {Aaron Z.} and Fabio Mattioli and Daniel Souleles",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1002/sea2.12114",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "157--171",
journal = "Economic Anthropology",
issn = "2330-4847",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

Finance beyond Function : Three Causal Explanations for Financialization. / Pitluck, Aaron Z.; Mattioli, Fabio; Souleles, Daniel.

In: Economic Anthropology, Vol. 5, No. 2, 06.2018, p. 157-171.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Finance beyond Function

T2 - Three Causal Explanations for Financialization

AU - Pitluck, Aaron Z.

AU - Mattioli, Fabio

AU - Souleles, Daniel

PY - 2018/6

Y1 - 2018/6

N2 - This article suggests that it is advantageous for social scientists to deliberately depart from functionalist theories seeking to explain the expansion of financial instruments and logics across social life. Rather, we identify three causes of financialization from three extant clusters of scholastic activity: an organic political economy that sees finance expanding as a product or by‐product of larger state‐ and imperial‐level political struggles, a relational sociology that sees the ways that finance expands by becoming another medium for expressing and constraining social relationships, and a cultural analysis that observes the increasing redefinition of discursive and material practices as financial. Across this larger discussion, we introduce and situate the contributions to this journal's special issue on financialization.

AB - This article suggests that it is advantageous for social scientists to deliberately depart from functionalist theories seeking to explain the expansion of financial instruments and logics across social life. Rather, we identify three causes of financialization from three extant clusters of scholastic activity: an organic political economy that sees finance expanding as a product or by‐product of larger state‐ and imperial‐level political struggles, a relational sociology that sees the ways that finance expands by becoming another medium for expressing and constraining social relationships, and a cultural analysis that observes the increasing redefinition of discursive and material practices as financial. Across this larger discussion, we introduce and situate the contributions to this journal's special issue on financialization.

KW - Financialization

KW - Functionalism

KW - Political economy

KW - Performativity

KW - Relational sociology

KW - Financialization

KW - Functionalism

KW - Political economy

KW - Performativity

KW - Relational sociology

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=2670000000416295&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1002/sea2.12114

DO - 10.1002/sea2.12114

M3 - Journal article

VL - 5

SP - 157

EP - 171

JO - Economic Anthropology

JF - Economic Anthropology

SN - 2330-4847

IS - 2

ER -