Fair Value and the Missing Correspondence Between Accounting and Auditing

Kim Klarskov Jeppesen, Dennis van Liempd

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The paper outlines the history of accounting and auditing thought, demonstrating how auditing has had an isomorphic relationship with accounting throughout most of its history. We focus this history on two turning points. The first is the turn from reporting the truth to reporting in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, which occurred in the 1960s as a result of the politicization of accounting standard setting. We argue that auditing adapted to this change by establishing a conceptual framework based on checking the correspondence between assertions and established criteria. The second turning point is from historical cost to fair values, which changes the ontological premises of accounting thought in the direction of ontological subjectivity. This has profound consequences for auditing, which so far has failed to develop new epistemic criteria to deal with fair value accounting’s socially constructed reality. We conclude the paper by discussing some implications of this for the future of auditing thought and practice.
Original languageEnglish
Publication date2013
Number of pages34
Publication statusPublished - 2013
EventThe 7th Accounting History International Conference : Innovation in Accounting Thought and Practice - The Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Sevilla, Spain
Duration: 27 Sep 201327 Sep 2013
Conference number: 7
http://www.7ahic-seville2013.com/#

Conference

ConferenceThe 7th Accounting History International Conference
Number7
LocationThe Universidad Pablo de Olavide
CountrySpain
CitySevilla
Period27/09/201327/09/2013
Internet address

Cite this

Klarskov Jeppesen, K., & Liempd, D. V. (2013). Fair Value and the Missing Correspondence Between Accounting and Auditing. Paper presented at The 7th Accounting History International Conference , Sevilla, Spain.
Klarskov Jeppesen, Kim ; Liempd, Dennis van. / Fair Value and the Missing Correspondence Between Accounting and Auditing. Paper presented at The 7th Accounting History International Conference , Sevilla, Spain.34 p.
@conference{15bab7376244405ba45122a0f498fd25,
title = "Fair Value and the Missing Correspondence Between Accounting and Auditing",
abstract = "The paper outlines the history of accounting and auditing thought, demonstrating how auditing has had an isomorphic relationship with accounting throughout most of its history. We focus this history on two turning points. The first is the turn from reporting the truth to reporting in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, which occurred in the 1960s as a result of the politicization of accounting standard setting. We argue that auditing adapted to this change by establishing a conceptual framework based on checking the correspondence between assertions and established criteria. The second turning point is from historical cost to fair values, which changes the ontological premises of accounting thought in the direction of ontological subjectivity. This has profound consequences for auditing, which so far has failed to develop new epistemic criteria to deal with fair value accounting’s socially constructed reality. We conclude the paper by discussing some implications of this for the future of auditing thought and practice.",
keywords = "Accounting history, Auditing, Conceptual framework, Asset valuation, Fair value, Historical cost",
author = "{Klarskov Jeppesen}, Kim and Liempd, {Dennis van}",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
note = "null ; Conference date: 27-09-2013 Through 27-09-2013",
url = "http://www.7ahic-seville2013.com/#",

}

Klarskov Jeppesen, K & Liempd, DV 2013, 'Fair Value and the Missing Correspondence Between Accounting and Auditing' Paper presented at, Sevilla, Spain, 27/09/2013 - 27/09/2013, .

Fair Value and the Missing Correspondence Between Accounting and Auditing. / Klarskov Jeppesen, Kim; Liempd, Dennis van.

2013. Paper presented at The 7th Accounting History International Conference , Sevilla, Spain.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperResearchpeer-review

TY - CONF

T1 - Fair Value and the Missing Correspondence Between Accounting and Auditing

AU - Klarskov Jeppesen, Kim

AU - Liempd, Dennis van

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - The paper outlines the history of accounting and auditing thought, demonstrating how auditing has had an isomorphic relationship with accounting throughout most of its history. We focus this history on two turning points. The first is the turn from reporting the truth to reporting in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, which occurred in the 1960s as a result of the politicization of accounting standard setting. We argue that auditing adapted to this change by establishing a conceptual framework based on checking the correspondence between assertions and established criteria. The second turning point is from historical cost to fair values, which changes the ontological premises of accounting thought in the direction of ontological subjectivity. This has profound consequences for auditing, which so far has failed to develop new epistemic criteria to deal with fair value accounting’s socially constructed reality. We conclude the paper by discussing some implications of this for the future of auditing thought and practice.

AB - The paper outlines the history of accounting and auditing thought, demonstrating how auditing has had an isomorphic relationship with accounting throughout most of its history. We focus this history on two turning points. The first is the turn from reporting the truth to reporting in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, which occurred in the 1960s as a result of the politicization of accounting standard setting. We argue that auditing adapted to this change by establishing a conceptual framework based on checking the correspondence between assertions and established criteria. The second turning point is from historical cost to fair values, which changes the ontological premises of accounting thought in the direction of ontological subjectivity. This has profound consequences for auditing, which so far has failed to develop new epistemic criteria to deal with fair value accounting’s socially constructed reality. We conclude the paper by discussing some implications of this for the future of auditing thought and practice.

KW - Accounting history

KW - Auditing

KW - Conceptual framework

KW - Asset valuation

KW - Fair value

KW - Historical cost

M3 - Paper

ER -

Klarskov Jeppesen K, Liempd DV. Fair Value and the Missing Correspondence Between Accounting and Auditing. 2013. Paper presented at The 7th Accounting History International Conference , Sevilla, Spain.