Facebook and the Public Framing of a Corporate Crisis

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Purpose
    – It is crucial for corporate communication to know how different public sources frame a crisis and how these sources influence each other. The purpose of this study is to investigate the role of Facebook by examining – if the public represented on Facebook contributes distinct frames to the discursive negotiation of a crisis at all, and whether the public represented on Facebook is able to influence the crisis framing of news media.

    Design/methodology/approach
    – The authors compared how four different public sources framed the Nestlé Kit Kat crisis: news media, corporate communication, NGOs, and Facebook users. The authors therefore, coded 5,185 sentences from the four sources and conducted a frame-analysis through the detection of co-occurrence between actors and attributions. A cross-correlation with a seven-day lag in each direction was applied to detect the frame-setting effects between the public represented on Facebook and news media.

    Findings
    – While the public represented on Facebook is found to apply distinct crisis frames in comparison to conventional sources, its frame-setting power is limited. In contrast to findings from political communication, it is rather the news media that influences the crisis framing in social media. The role of the public represented on Facebook, hence, appears marginal in comparison to news media that remain a major force in the discursive negotiation of a corporate crisis.

    Originality/value
    – As a first study, crisis framing in social media is compared with that of news media, NGOs, and corporate communication. Second, so far there have been no studies in the corporate communication field investigating the frame-setting effects between social media and news media. Contrary to social media’s promising frame-setting power ascribed by some scholars, the authors do not find such effects with Facebook, the most popular social media tool to date.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalCorporate Communications
    Volume20
    Issue number2
    Pages (from-to)163-177
    ISSN1356-3289
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Keywords

    • NGOs
    • Social Media
    • Corporate Communication
    • Frame Setting
    • Framing
    • News Media

    Cite this

    @article{a0b2eed17f7e407196eaf743cecd0eeb,
    title = "Facebook and the Public Framing of a Corporate Crisis",
    abstract = "Purpose– It is crucial for corporate communication to know how different public sources frame a crisis and how these sources influence each other. The purpose of this study is to investigate the role of Facebook by examining – if the public represented on Facebook contributes distinct frames to the discursive negotiation of a crisis at all, and whether the public represented on Facebook is able to influence the crisis framing of news media.Design/methodology/approach– The authors compared how four different public sources framed the Nestl{\'e} Kit Kat crisis: news media, corporate communication, NGOs, and Facebook users. The authors therefore, coded 5,185 sentences from the four sources and conducted a frame-analysis through the detection of co-occurrence between actors and attributions. A cross-correlation with a seven-day lag in each direction was applied to detect the frame-setting effects between the public represented on Facebook and news media.Findings– While the public represented on Facebook is found to apply distinct crisis frames in comparison to conventional sources, its frame-setting power is limited. In contrast to findings from political communication, it is rather the news media that influences the crisis framing in social media. The role of the public represented on Facebook, hence, appears marginal in comparison to news media that remain a major force in the discursive negotiation of a corporate crisis.Originality/value– As a first study, crisis framing in social media is compared with that of news media, NGOs, and corporate communication. Second, so far there have been no studies in the corporate communication field investigating the frame-setting effects between social media and news media. Contrary to social media’s promising frame-setting power ascribed by some scholars, the authors do not find such effects with Facebook, the most popular social media tool to date.",
    keywords = "NGOs, Social Media, Corporate Communication, Frame Setting, Framing, News Media, NGOs, Social Media, Corporate Communication, Frame Setting, Framing, News Media",
    author = "Michael Etter and Vestergaard, {Anne Granly}",
    year = "2015",
    doi = "10.1108/CCIJ-10-2013-0082",
    language = "English",
    volume = "20",
    pages = "163--177",
    journal = "Corporate Communications",
    issn = "1356-3289",
    publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing",
    number = "2",

    }

    Facebook and the Public Framing of a Corporate Crisis. / Etter, Michael; Vestergaard, Anne Granly.

    In: Corporate Communications, Vol. 20, No. 2, 2015, p. 163-177.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Facebook and the Public Framing of a Corporate Crisis

    AU - Etter, Michael

    AU - Vestergaard, Anne Granly

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - Purpose– It is crucial for corporate communication to know how different public sources frame a crisis and how these sources influence each other. The purpose of this study is to investigate the role of Facebook by examining – if the public represented on Facebook contributes distinct frames to the discursive negotiation of a crisis at all, and whether the public represented on Facebook is able to influence the crisis framing of news media.Design/methodology/approach– The authors compared how four different public sources framed the Nestlé Kit Kat crisis: news media, corporate communication, NGOs, and Facebook users. The authors therefore, coded 5,185 sentences from the four sources and conducted a frame-analysis through the detection of co-occurrence between actors and attributions. A cross-correlation with a seven-day lag in each direction was applied to detect the frame-setting effects between the public represented on Facebook and news media.Findings– While the public represented on Facebook is found to apply distinct crisis frames in comparison to conventional sources, its frame-setting power is limited. In contrast to findings from political communication, it is rather the news media that influences the crisis framing in social media. The role of the public represented on Facebook, hence, appears marginal in comparison to news media that remain a major force in the discursive negotiation of a corporate crisis.Originality/value– As a first study, crisis framing in social media is compared with that of news media, NGOs, and corporate communication. Second, so far there have been no studies in the corporate communication field investigating the frame-setting effects between social media and news media. Contrary to social media’s promising frame-setting power ascribed by some scholars, the authors do not find such effects with Facebook, the most popular social media tool to date.

    AB - Purpose– It is crucial for corporate communication to know how different public sources frame a crisis and how these sources influence each other. The purpose of this study is to investigate the role of Facebook by examining – if the public represented on Facebook contributes distinct frames to the discursive negotiation of a crisis at all, and whether the public represented on Facebook is able to influence the crisis framing of news media.Design/methodology/approach– The authors compared how four different public sources framed the Nestlé Kit Kat crisis: news media, corporate communication, NGOs, and Facebook users. The authors therefore, coded 5,185 sentences from the four sources and conducted a frame-analysis through the detection of co-occurrence between actors and attributions. A cross-correlation with a seven-day lag in each direction was applied to detect the frame-setting effects between the public represented on Facebook and news media.Findings– While the public represented on Facebook is found to apply distinct crisis frames in comparison to conventional sources, its frame-setting power is limited. In contrast to findings from political communication, it is rather the news media that influences the crisis framing in social media. The role of the public represented on Facebook, hence, appears marginal in comparison to news media that remain a major force in the discursive negotiation of a corporate crisis.Originality/value– As a first study, crisis framing in social media is compared with that of news media, NGOs, and corporate communication. Second, so far there have been no studies in the corporate communication field investigating the frame-setting effects between social media and news media. Contrary to social media’s promising frame-setting power ascribed by some scholars, the authors do not find such effects with Facebook, the most popular social media tool to date.

    KW - NGOs

    KW - Social Media

    KW - Corporate Communication

    KW - Frame Setting

    KW - Framing

    KW - News Media

    KW - NGOs

    KW - Social Media

    KW - Corporate Communication

    KW - Frame Setting

    KW - Framing

    KW - News Media

    UR - http://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=963017769197&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

    U2 - 10.1108/CCIJ-10-2013-0082

    DO - 10.1108/CCIJ-10-2013-0082

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 20

    SP - 163

    EP - 177

    JO - Corporate Communications

    JF - Corporate Communications

    SN - 1356-3289

    IS - 2

    ER -