Extra-Training I-deals: A Win-Win-Win-Win Process

Patricia Elgoibar, Morten Lindholst

    Research output: Other contributionEducation

    Abstract

    Where before collective agreements were prevalent, now employees get the opportunity to negotiate individually with his or her employer. Individual negotiation or idiosyncratic deals, also called I-deals, are more and more present in nowadays businesses. These deals are voluntary, personalized agreements of a nonstandard nature that individual employees negotiate with their employer regarding terms which benefit each party (Rousseau, 2000). The key question is to find the way in which these agreements are beneficial to the company, the manager, the employee and the co-workers. This case illustrates the negotiation process between a team manager at TNK - a leading multinational software development company- and one of his team members. The employee is willing to negotiate an I-deal with the objective of attending a training course abroad. This case is a two-party employment deal-making exercise. The roles in this exercise are: a) the employee who initiates the I-deal; and b) the manager. The case could be used also as a three-party exercise, including the role of the facilitator. The case aims are twofold: a) engage students in exploring a win-win-win-win agreement; and b) demonstrating the power of integrative negotiation tactics in an environment that will be familiar to most students. It also shows the students the importance of preparation, listening, and understanding the perspective of the other side. The case is open to both, beginners and more experienced negotiators as well as with diverse educational level: undergraduate, MBA and executives. It yields the highest learning potential for those having a good basic background in negotiation theory. The case has been tested in negotiation and employment relations courses in diverse target groups: undergraduate students, executives, and professionals; as well as in students from different cultural backgrounds. The feedback from the students shows a clear understanding of the information described in the test as well as a satisfactory learning experience in the concept of I-deals terms, understanding of the concept of BATNA in negotiation, and the importance of taking into account the interests of the other party and parties when negotiating this type of agreements.
    Original languageEnglish
    Publication date16 Feb 2016
    Place of PublicationCranfield
    PublisherCase Centre
    Number of pages3
    Publication statusPublished - 16 Feb 2016

    Bibliographical note

    Case - Reference no. 416-0006-1

    Keywords

    • Management of human resources
    • Negotiated agreement
    • Integrative negotiation
    • Individual and group decision making

    Cite this

    Elgoibar, P., & Lindholst, M. (2016, Feb 16). Extra-Training I-deals: A Win-Win-Win-Win Process. Cranfield: Case Centre.
    Elgoibar, Patricia ; Lindholst, Morten . / Extra-Training I-deals : A Win-Win-Win-Win Process. 2016. Cranfield : Case Centre. 3 p.
    @misc{4074c64e853540d086c8493a09dd60f7,
    title = "Extra-Training I-deals: A Win-Win-Win-Win Process",
    abstract = "Where before collective agreements were prevalent, now employees get the opportunity to negotiate individually with his or her employer. Individual negotiation or idiosyncratic deals, also called I-deals, are more and more present in nowadays businesses. These deals are voluntary, personalized agreements of a nonstandard nature that individual employees negotiate with their employer regarding terms which benefit each party (Rousseau, 2000). The key question is to find the way in which these agreements are beneficial to the company, the manager, the employee and the co-workers. This case illustrates the negotiation process between a team manager at TNK - a leading multinational software development company- and one of his team members. The employee is willing to negotiate an I-deal with the objective of attending a training course abroad. This case is a two-party employment deal-making exercise. The roles in this exercise are: a) the employee who initiates the I-deal; and b) the manager. The case could be used also as a three-party exercise, including the role of the facilitator. The case aims are twofold: a) engage students in exploring a win-win-win-win agreement; and b) demonstrating the power of integrative negotiation tactics in an environment that will be familiar to most students. It also shows the students the importance of preparation, listening, and understanding the perspective of the other side. The case is open to both, beginners and more experienced negotiators as well as with diverse educational level: undergraduate, MBA and executives. It yields the highest learning potential for those having a good basic background in negotiation theory. The case has been tested in negotiation and employment relations courses in diverse target groups: undergraduate students, executives, and professionals; as well as in students from different cultural backgrounds. The feedback from the students shows a clear understanding of the information described in the test as well as a satisfactory learning experience in the concept of I-deals terms, understanding of the concept of BATNA in negotiation, and the importance of taking into account the interests of the other party and parties when negotiating this type of agreements.",
    keywords = "Management of human resources, Negotiated agreement, Integrative negotiation, Individual and group decision making, Management of human resources, Negotiated agreement, Integrative negotiation, Individual and group decision making",
    author = "Patricia Elgoibar and Morten Lindholst",
    note = "Case - Reference no. 416-0006-1",
    year = "2016",
    month = "2",
    day = "16",
    language = "English",
    publisher = "Case Centre",
    address = "United Kingdom",
    type = "Other",

    }

    Elgoibar, P & Lindholst, M 2016, Extra-Training I-deals: A Win-Win-Win-Win Process. Case Centre, Cranfield.

    Extra-Training I-deals : A Win-Win-Win-Win Process. / Elgoibar, Patricia; Lindholst, Morten .

    3 p. Cranfield : Case Centre. 2016, Case.

    Research output: Other contributionEducation

    TY - GEN

    T1 - Extra-Training I-deals

    T2 - A Win-Win-Win-Win Process

    AU - Elgoibar, Patricia

    AU - Lindholst, Morten

    N1 - Case - Reference no. 416-0006-1

    PY - 2016/2/16

    Y1 - 2016/2/16

    N2 - Where before collective agreements were prevalent, now employees get the opportunity to negotiate individually with his or her employer. Individual negotiation or idiosyncratic deals, also called I-deals, are more and more present in nowadays businesses. These deals are voluntary, personalized agreements of a nonstandard nature that individual employees negotiate with their employer regarding terms which benefit each party (Rousseau, 2000). The key question is to find the way in which these agreements are beneficial to the company, the manager, the employee and the co-workers. This case illustrates the negotiation process between a team manager at TNK - a leading multinational software development company- and one of his team members. The employee is willing to negotiate an I-deal with the objective of attending a training course abroad. This case is a two-party employment deal-making exercise. The roles in this exercise are: a) the employee who initiates the I-deal; and b) the manager. The case could be used also as a three-party exercise, including the role of the facilitator. The case aims are twofold: a) engage students in exploring a win-win-win-win agreement; and b) demonstrating the power of integrative negotiation tactics in an environment that will be familiar to most students. It also shows the students the importance of preparation, listening, and understanding the perspective of the other side. The case is open to both, beginners and more experienced negotiators as well as with diverse educational level: undergraduate, MBA and executives. It yields the highest learning potential for those having a good basic background in negotiation theory. The case has been tested in negotiation and employment relations courses in diverse target groups: undergraduate students, executives, and professionals; as well as in students from different cultural backgrounds. The feedback from the students shows a clear understanding of the information described in the test as well as a satisfactory learning experience in the concept of I-deals terms, understanding of the concept of BATNA in negotiation, and the importance of taking into account the interests of the other party and parties when negotiating this type of agreements.

    AB - Where before collective agreements were prevalent, now employees get the opportunity to negotiate individually with his or her employer. Individual negotiation or idiosyncratic deals, also called I-deals, are more and more present in nowadays businesses. These deals are voluntary, personalized agreements of a nonstandard nature that individual employees negotiate with their employer regarding terms which benefit each party (Rousseau, 2000). The key question is to find the way in which these agreements are beneficial to the company, the manager, the employee and the co-workers. This case illustrates the negotiation process between a team manager at TNK - a leading multinational software development company- and one of his team members. The employee is willing to negotiate an I-deal with the objective of attending a training course abroad. This case is a two-party employment deal-making exercise. The roles in this exercise are: a) the employee who initiates the I-deal; and b) the manager. The case could be used also as a three-party exercise, including the role of the facilitator. The case aims are twofold: a) engage students in exploring a win-win-win-win agreement; and b) demonstrating the power of integrative negotiation tactics in an environment that will be familiar to most students. It also shows the students the importance of preparation, listening, and understanding the perspective of the other side. The case is open to both, beginners and more experienced negotiators as well as with diverse educational level: undergraduate, MBA and executives. It yields the highest learning potential for those having a good basic background in negotiation theory. The case has been tested in negotiation and employment relations courses in diverse target groups: undergraduate students, executives, and professionals; as well as in students from different cultural backgrounds. The feedback from the students shows a clear understanding of the information described in the test as well as a satisfactory learning experience in the concept of I-deals terms, understanding of the concept of BATNA in negotiation, and the importance of taking into account the interests of the other party and parties when negotiating this type of agreements.

    KW - Management of human resources

    KW - Negotiated agreement

    KW - Integrative negotiation

    KW - Individual and group decision making

    KW - Management of human resources

    KW - Negotiated agreement

    KW - Integrative negotiation

    KW - Individual and group decision making

    M3 - Other contribution

    PB - Case Centre

    CY - Cranfield

    ER -

    Elgoibar P, Lindholst M. Extra-Training I-deals: A Win-Win-Win-Win Process. 2016. 3 p.