Abstract
How can a firm apply the appropriate interaction between exploration and exploitation with the goal of either radical or incremental innovation? In this study, we seek to answer this puzzling question by reframing exploitation and exploration as a duality of learning (i.e., two modes that are partial complementary for synergy as well as partial conflicting for tradeoff). Specifically, rather than assuming either a positive or negative interaction between exploration and exploitation as prior literature has done, our study highlights a novel pattern of inverted U-shaped interaction between exploration and exploitation for both radical and incremental innovations. With a Chinese sample of 508 firms, our empirical evidence supports our prediction of two patterns of inverted U-shaped interaction of exploration and exploitation. Such unique findings showcase the unique value of reframing paradox into duality from the meta-perspective of yin-yang balancing to shed new light on organizational ambidexterity and innovation management.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Management and Organization Review |
Volume | 19 |
Issue number | 3 |
Pages (from-to) | 498-532 |
Number of pages | 35 |
ISSN | 1740-8776 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jun 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Published online: 16 March 2023.Keywords
- Curvilinear interaction
- Exploitation–exploration ambidexterity
- Incremental innovation
- Paradox as yin-yang duality
- Radical innovation