Explaining the Variation in Adoption Rates of the Information Content of Environmental Disclosure: An Exploration of Innovation Adoption Theory

Even Fallan

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: - Corporate management decides what types of environmental information content to disclose/adopt. It is explored whether internal context - decision-makers’ perception of characteristics of the information content - might predict the variation in adoption rates of different types of content, and whether innovation adoption theory might represent important factors of this decision-making process.
Design/methodology/approach: - Actual adoption rates of 13 information content categories are computed using content analysis of annual reports for 62 listed companies. Each content category is seen as an innovation the company decides to adopt or not. Interviews with management in several companies illustrate the decision process of disclosure, and help predict adoption rates. Predicted and actual adoption rates are compared.
Findings: - Adoption rates vary considerably among the 13 types of content. The absolute level of adoption rates is affected by company size and environmental risk. However, those content categories that have either relatively high or low adoption rates are consistent among the subsamples, regardless of these corporate characteristics. This consistent variation in adoption rates seems to be predicted well by innovation adoption theory and its focus on the five attributes of the information itself: compatibility, trialability, complexity, observability and relative advantage.
Research limitations/implications: - The theoretical framework allows for different or changing internal and general contexts, and should be applicable to other settings, even though the particular predictions for adoption rates in this paper may not be applied as such.
Originality/value: - The level of analysis is changed from the company level, which dominates previous research, to information content (individual content categories). Perceived attributes of the information content itself and innovation adoption theory are used for the first time to explain reason for the reporting practice, and are considered fruitful tools to predict consistent variations in adoption rates among different types of content. This approach provides new insight into the driving forces of supply of disclosure.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Accounting and Organizational Change
Volume11
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)247-268
Number of pages22
ISSN1832-5912
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Cite this

@article{52e830a360e34c3c9389450b3312f0b9,
title = "Explaining the Variation in Adoption Rates of the Information Content of Environmental Disclosure: An Exploration of Innovation Adoption Theory",
abstract = "Purpose: - Corporate management decides what types of environmental information content to disclose/adopt. It is explored whether internal context - decision-makers’ perception of characteristics of the information content - might predict the variation in adoption rates of different types of content, and whether innovation adoption theory might represent important factors of this decision-making process.Design/methodology/approach: - Actual adoption rates of 13 information content categories are computed using content analysis of annual reports for 62 listed companies. Each content category is seen as an innovation the company decides to adopt or not. Interviews with management in several companies illustrate the decision process of disclosure, and help predict adoption rates. Predicted and actual adoption rates are compared.Findings: - Adoption rates vary considerably among the 13 types of content. The absolute level of adoption rates is affected by company size and environmental risk. However, those content categories that have either relatively high or low adoption rates are consistent among the subsamples, regardless of these corporate characteristics. This consistent variation in adoption rates seems to be predicted well by innovation adoption theory and its focus on the five attributes of the information itself: compatibility, trialability, complexity, observability and relative advantage.Research limitations/implications: - The theoretical framework allows for different or changing internal and general contexts, and should be applicable to other settings, even though the particular predictions for adoption rates in this paper may not be applied as such.Originality/value: - The level of analysis is changed from the company level, which dominates previous research, to information content (individual content categories). Perceived attributes of the information content itself and innovation adoption theory are used for the first time to explain reason for the reporting practice, and are considered fruitful tools to predict consistent variations in adoption rates among different types of content. This approach provides new insight into the driving forces of supply of disclosure.",
author = "Even Fallan",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1108/JAOC-11-2012-0106",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "247--268",
journal = "Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change",
issn = "1832-5912",
publisher = "JAI Press",
number = "2",

}

Explaining the Variation in Adoption Rates of the Information Content of Environmental Disclosure : An Exploration of Innovation Adoption Theory. / Fallan, Even.

In: Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2015, p. 247-268.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Explaining the Variation in Adoption Rates of the Information Content of Environmental Disclosure

T2 - An Exploration of Innovation Adoption Theory

AU - Fallan, Even

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Purpose: - Corporate management decides what types of environmental information content to disclose/adopt. It is explored whether internal context - decision-makers’ perception of characteristics of the information content - might predict the variation in adoption rates of different types of content, and whether innovation adoption theory might represent important factors of this decision-making process.Design/methodology/approach: - Actual adoption rates of 13 information content categories are computed using content analysis of annual reports for 62 listed companies. Each content category is seen as an innovation the company decides to adopt or not. Interviews with management in several companies illustrate the decision process of disclosure, and help predict adoption rates. Predicted and actual adoption rates are compared.Findings: - Adoption rates vary considerably among the 13 types of content. The absolute level of adoption rates is affected by company size and environmental risk. However, those content categories that have either relatively high or low adoption rates are consistent among the subsamples, regardless of these corporate characteristics. This consistent variation in adoption rates seems to be predicted well by innovation adoption theory and its focus on the five attributes of the information itself: compatibility, trialability, complexity, observability and relative advantage.Research limitations/implications: - The theoretical framework allows for different or changing internal and general contexts, and should be applicable to other settings, even though the particular predictions for adoption rates in this paper may not be applied as such.Originality/value: - The level of analysis is changed from the company level, which dominates previous research, to information content (individual content categories). Perceived attributes of the information content itself and innovation adoption theory are used for the first time to explain reason for the reporting practice, and are considered fruitful tools to predict consistent variations in adoption rates among different types of content. This approach provides new insight into the driving forces of supply of disclosure.

AB - Purpose: - Corporate management decides what types of environmental information content to disclose/adopt. It is explored whether internal context - decision-makers’ perception of characteristics of the information content - might predict the variation in adoption rates of different types of content, and whether innovation adoption theory might represent important factors of this decision-making process.Design/methodology/approach: - Actual adoption rates of 13 information content categories are computed using content analysis of annual reports for 62 listed companies. Each content category is seen as an innovation the company decides to adopt or not. Interviews with management in several companies illustrate the decision process of disclosure, and help predict adoption rates. Predicted and actual adoption rates are compared.Findings: - Adoption rates vary considerably among the 13 types of content. The absolute level of adoption rates is affected by company size and environmental risk. However, those content categories that have either relatively high or low adoption rates are consistent among the subsamples, regardless of these corporate characteristics. This consistent variation in adoption rates seems to be predicted well by innovation adoption theory and its focus on the five attributes of the information itself: compatibility, trialability, complexity, observability and relative advantage.Research limitations/implications: - The theoretical framework allows for different or changing internal and general contexts, and should be applicable to other settings, even though the particular predictions for adoption rates in this paper may not be applied as such.Originality/value: - The level of analysis is changed from the company level, which dominates previous research, to information content (individual content categories). Perceived attributes of the information content itself and innovation adoption theory are used for the first time to explain reason for the reporting practice, and are considered fruitful tools to predict consistent variations in adoption rates among different types of content. This approach provides new insight into the driving forces of supply of disclosure.

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=1000000000220572

U2 - 10.1108/JAOC-11-2012-0106

DO - 10.1108/JAOC-11-2012-0106

M3 - Journal article

VL - 11

SP - 247

EP - 268

JO - Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change

JF - Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change

SN - 1832-5912

IS - 2

ER -