Explaining Governance in Global Value Chains

A Modular Theory-Building Effort

Stefano Ponte, Timothy Sturgeon

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    4177 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    In this article, we review the evolution and current status of global value chain (GVC) governance theory and take some initial steps toward a broader theory of governance through an exercise in ‘modular theory-building’. We focus on two GVC governance theories to which we previously contributed: a theory of linking and a theory of conventions. The modular framework we propose is built on three scalar dimensions: (1) a micro level – determinants and dynamics of exchange at individual value chain nodes; (2) a meso level – how and to what extent these linkage characteristics ‘travel’ upstream and downstream in the value chain; and (3) a macro level – looking at ‘overall’ GVC governance. Given space limitations, we focus only on the issue of ‘polarity’ in governance at the macro level, distinguishing between unipolar, bipolar and multipolar governance forms. While we leave a more ambitious analysis of how overall GVC governance is mutually constituted by micro/meso factors and broader institutional, regulatory and societal processes to future work, we provide an initial framework to which this work could be linked. Our ultimate purpose is to spur future efforts that seek to use and refine additional theories, to connect theories together better or in different modular configurations, and to incorporate elements at the macro level that reflect the changing constellation of key actors in GVC governance – the increasing influence of, for example, NGOs, taste and standard makers, and social movements in GVC governance.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalReview of International Political Economy
    Volume21
    Issue number1
    Pages (from-to)195-223
    Number of pages29
    ISSN0969-2290
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Cite this

    @article{ae4c07ffd35f4cd09229efe1718a5e43,
    title = "Explaining Governance in Global Value Chains: A Modular Theory-Building Effort",
    abstract = "In this article, we review the evolution and current status of global value chain (GVC) governance theory and take some initial steps toward a broader theory of governance through an exercise in ‘modular theory-building’. We focus on two GVC governance theories to which we previously contributed: a theory of linking and a theory of conventions. The modular framework we propose is built on three scalar dimensions: (1) a micro level – determinants and dynamics of exchange at individual value chain nodes; (2) a meso level – how and to what extent these linkage characteristics ‘travel’ upstream and downstream in the value chain; and (3) a macro level – looking at ‘overall’ GVC governance. Given space limitations, we focus only on the issue of ‘polarity’ in governance at the macro level, distinguishing between unipolar, bipolar and multipolar governance forms. While we leave a more ambitious analysis of how overall GVC governance is mutually constituted by micro/meso factors and broader institutional, regulatory and societal processes to future work, we provide an initial framework to which this work could be linked. Our ultimate purpose is to spur future efforts that seek to use and refine additional theories, to connect theories together better or in different modular configurations, and to incorporate elements at the macro level that reflect the changing constellation of key actors in GVC governance – the increasing influence of, for example, NGOs, taste and standard makers, and social movements in GVC governance.",
    keywords = "Governance, Global value chains, Polarity, Linking mechanisms, Conventions, Modular theory building",
    author = "Stefano Ponte and Timothy Sturgeon",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.1080/09692290.2013.809596",
    language = "English",
    volume = "21",
    pages = "195--223",
    journal = "Review of International Political Economy",
    issn = "0969-2290",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "1",

    }

    Explaining Governance in Global Value Chains : A Modular Theory-Building Effort. / Ponte, Stefano; Sturgeon, Timothy.

    In: Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2014, p. 195-223.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Explaining Governance in Global Value Chains

    T2 - A Modular Theory-Building Effort

    AU - Ponte, Stefano

    AU - Sturgeon, Timothy

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - In this article, we review the evolution and current status of global value chain (GVC) governance theory and take some initial steps toward a broader theory of governance through an exercise in ‘modular theory-building’. We focus on two GVC governance theories to which we previously contributed: a theory of linking and a theory of conventions. The modular framework we propose is built on three scalar dimensions: (1) a micro level – determinants and dynamics of exchange at individual value chain nodes; (2) a meso level – how and to what extent these linkage characteristics ‘travel’ upstream and downstream in the value chain; and (3) a macro level – looking at ‘overall’ GVC governance. Given space limitations, we focus only on the issue of ‘polarity’ in governance at the macro level, distinguishing between unipolar, bipolar and multipolar governance forms. While we leave a more ambitious analysis of how overall GVC governance is mutually constituted by micro/meso factors and broader institutional, regulatory and societal processes to future work, we provide an initial framework to which this work could be linked. Our ultimate purpose is to spur future efforts that seek to use and refine additional theories, to connect theories together better or in different modular configurations, and to incorporate elements at the macro level that reflect the changing constellation of key actors in GVC governance – the increasing influence of, for example, NGOs, taste and standard makers, and social movements in GVC governance.

    AB - In this article, we review the evolution and current status of global value chain (GVC) governance theory and take some initial steps toward a broader theory of governance through an exercise in ‘modular theory-building’. We focus on two GVC governance theories to which we previously contributed: a theory of linking and a theory of conventions. The modular framework we propose is built on three scalar dimensions: (1) a micro level – determinants and dynamics of exchange at individual value chain nodes; (2) a meso level – how and to what extent these linkage characteristics ‘travel’ upstream and downstream in the value chain; and (3) a macro level – looking at ‘overall’ GVC governance. Given space limitations, we focus only on the issue of ‘polarity’ in governance at the macro level, distinguishing between unipolar, bipolar and multipolar governance forms. While we leave a more ambitious analysis of how overall GVC governance is mutually constituted by micro/meso factors and broader institutional, regulatory and societal processes to future work, we provide an initial framework to which this work could be linked. Our ultimate purpose is to spur future efforts that seek to use and refine additional theories, to connect theories together better or in different modular configurations, and to incorporate elements at the macro level that reflect the changing constellation of key actors in GVC governance – the increasing influence of, for example, NGOs, taste and standard makers, and social movements in GVC governance.

    KW - Governance

    KW - Global value chains

    KW - Polarity

    KW - Linking mechanisms

    KW - Conventions

    KW - Modular theory building

    U2 - 10.1080/09692290.2013.809596

    DO - 10.1080/09692290.2013.809596

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 21

    SP - 195

    EP - 223

    JO - Review of International Political Economy

    JF - Review of International Political Economy

    SN - 0969-2290

    IS - 1

    ER -