Experts Networks and the European Commission on Demographic Change

Leonard Seabrooke, Eleni Tsingou, Johann Ole Willers

Research output: Working paperResearch

Abstract

This paper examines who populates the expert and policy network around demographic change issues in Europe. We examine how competing policy departments in the European Commission Directorates-General (DGs) deal with the issue of Europe’s changing demography, as well as discuss the role of external experts on demographic change. Our findings suggest that on demographic change issues at the EU level, DG EMPL has taken the lead, while DG ECFIN is the secondary actor. Still, internal European Commission dynamics mean that the lead actor on demographic issues has less autonomy in articulating a funded and clear policy position on how to address them. As a consequence, there is little institutional memory and hardly a depository of activity on demographic change. While outside expertise comes primarily from demographers, and other scholars concerned with demographic change, they are primarily an academic community rather than heavily engaged in European policy formulation. As a consequence of these dynamics, the European mode of governance on demographic change issues suffers from a lack of both flexibility and direction. It is an important slow-burning issue that is captured by neither the ‘new intergovernmentalism’ nor the ‘new supranationalism’ in post-crisis European governance strategies. Rather, demographic change issues largely operate in a vacuum and make only sporadic appearances on the EU agenda.
This paper examines who populates the expert and policy network around demographic change issues in Europe. We examine how competing policy departments in the European Commission Directorates-General (DGs) deal with the issue of Europe’s changing demography, as well as discuss the role of external experts on demographic change. Our findings suggest that on demographic change issues at the EU level, DG EMPL has taken the lead, while DG ECFIN is the secondary actor. Still, internal European Commission dynamics mean that the lead actor on demographic issues has less autonomy in articulating a funded and clear policy position on how to address them. As a consequence, there is little institutional memory and hardly a depository of activity on demographic change. While outside expertise comes primarily from demographers, and other scholars concerned with demographic change, they are primarily an academic community rather than heavily engaged in European policy formulation. As a consequence of these dynamics, the European mode of governance on demographic change issues suffers from a lack of both flexibility and direction. It is an important slow-burning issue that is captured by neither the ‘new intergovernmentalism’ nor the ‘new supranationalism’ in post-crisis European governance strategies. Rather, demographic change issues largely operate in a vacuum and make only sporadic appearances on the EU agenda.
LanguageEnglish
Place of PublicationFrederiksberg
PublisherCopenhagen Business School, CBS
Number of pages17
StatePublished - 2018

Bibliographical note

This research was funded by the European Commission Horizon 2020 project “European Legitimacy in Governing through Hard Times” (#649456-ENLIGHTEN).

Cite this

Seabrooke, L., Tsingou, E., & Willers, J. O. (2018). Experts Networks and the European Commission on Demographic Change. Frederiksberg: Copenhagen Business School, CBS.
Seabrooke, Leonard ; Tsingou, Eleni ; Willers, Johann Ole. / Experts Networks and the European Commission on Demographic Change. Frederiksberg : Copenhagen Business School, CBS, 2018.
@techreport{6b5587990bd94c2d97b7a9efaca23e23,
title = "Experts Networks and the European Commission on Demographic Change",
abstract = "This paper examines who populates the expert and policy network around demographic change issues in Europe. We examine how competing policy departments in the European Commission Directorates-General (DGs) deal with the issue of Europe’s changing demography, as well as discuss the role of external experts on demographic change. Our findings suggest that on demographic change issues at the EU level, DG EMPL has taken the lead, while DG ECFIN is the secondary actor. Still, internal European Commission dynamics mean that the lead actor on demographic issues has less autonomy in articulating a funded and clear policy position on how to address them. As a consequence, there is little institutional memory and hardly a depository of activity on demographic change. While outside expertise comes primarily from demographers, and other scholars concerned with demographic change, they are primarily an academic community rather than heavily engaged in European policy formulation. As a consequence of these dynamics, the European mode of governance on demographic change issues suffers from a lack of both flexibility and direction. It is an important slow-burning issue that is captured by neither the ‘new intergovernmentalism’ nor the ‘new supranationalism’ in post-crisis European governance strategies. Rather, demographic change issues largely operate in a vacuum and make only sporadic appearances on the EU agenda.",
author = "Leonard Seabrooke and Eleni Tsingou and Willers, {Johann Ole}",
note = "This research was funded by the European Commission Horizon 2020 project “European Legitimacy in Governing through Hard Times” (#649456-ENLIGHTEN).",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
publisher = "Copenhagen Business School, CBS",
address = "Denmark",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Copenhagen Business School, CBS",

}

Seabrooke, L, Tsingou, E & Willers, JO 2018 'Experts Networks and the European Commission on Demographic Change' Copenhagen Business School, CBS, Frederiksberg.

Experts Networks and the European Commission on Demographic Change. / Seabrooke, Leonard; Tsingou, Eleni; Willers, Johann Ole.

Frederiksberg : Copenhagen Business School, CBS, 2018.

Research output: Working paperResearch

TY - UNPB

T1 - Experts Networks and the European Commission on Demographic Change

AU - Seabrooke,Leonard

AU - Tsingou,Eleni

AU - Willers,Johann Ole

N1 - This research was funded by the European Commission Horizon 2020 project “European Legitimacy in Governing through Hard Times” (#649456-ENLIGHTEN).

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - This paper examines who populates the expert and policy network around demographic change issues in Europe. We examine how competing policy departments in the European Commission Directorates-General (DGs) deal with the issue of Europe’s changing demography, as well as discuss the role of external experts on demographic change. Our findings suggest that on demographic change issues at the EU level, DG EMPL has taken the lead, while DG ECFIN is the secondary actor. Still, internal European Commission dynamics mean that the lead actor on demographic issues has less autonomy in articulating a funded and clear policy position on how to address them. As a consequence, there is little institutional memory and hardly a depository of activity on demographic change. While outside expertise comes primarily from demographers, and other scholars concerned with demographic change, they are primarily an academic community rather than heavily engaged in European policy formulation. As a consequence of these dynamics, the European mode of governance on demographic change issues suffers from a lack of both flexibility and direction. It is an important slow-burning issue that is captured by neither the ‘new intergovernmentalism’ nor the ‘new supranationalism’ in post-crisis European governance strategies. Rather, demographic change issues largely operate in a vacuum and make only sporadic appearances on the EU agenda.

AB - This paper examines who populates the expert and policy network around demographic change issues in Europe. We examine how competing policy departments in the European Commission Directorates-General (DGs) deal with the issue of Europe’s changing demography, as well as discuss the role of external experts on demographic change. Our findings suggest that on demographic change issues at the EU level, DG EMPL has taken the lead, while DG ECFIN is the secondary actor. Still, internal European Commission dynamics mean that the lead actor on demographic issues has less autonomy in articulating a funded and clear policy position on how to address them. As a consequence, there is little institutional memory and hardly a depository of activity on demographic change. While outside expertise comes primarily from demographers, and other scholars concerned with demographic change, they are primarily an academic community rather than heavily engaged in European policy formulation. As a consequence of these dynamics, the European mode of governance on demographic change issues suffers from a lack of both flexibility and direction. It is an important slow-burning issue that is captured by neither the ‘new intergovernmentalism’ nor the ‘new supranationalism’ in post-crisis European governance strategies. Rather, demographic change issues largely operate in a vacuum and make only sporadic appearances on the EU agenda.

M3 - Working paper

BT - Experts Networks and the European Commission on Demographic Change

PB - Copenhagen Business School, CBS

CY - Frederiksberg

ER -

Seabrooke L, Tsingou E, Willers JO. Experts Networks and the European Commission on Demographic Change. Frederiksberg: Copenhagen Business School, CBS. 2018.