Abstract
This paper studies a model whereby exclusive dealing (ED) can both promote investment and foreclose a more efficient supplier. Since ED promotes the incumbent seller's investment, the seller and the buyer realize a greater surplus from bilateral trade under exclusivity. Hence, the parties involved may sign an ED contract that excludes a more efficient entrant in circumstances where ED would not arise absent investment. The paper therefore invites a more cautious attitude towards accepting possible investment promotion arguments as a defense for ED.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Journal of Industrial Economics |
Volume | 60 |
Issue number | 4 |
Pages (from-to) | 599-608 |
ISSN | 0022-1821 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2012 |