Evaluation Use in Evaluation Systems

The Case of the European Commission

Steven Højlund

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    This article investigates the European Union’s evaluation system and its conduciveness to evaluation use. Taking the European Commission’s LIFE programme as its case, the article makes an empirical contribution to an emerging focus in the literature on the importance of organization and institutions when analyzing evaluation use. By focusing on the European Union’s evaluation system the article finds that evaluation use mainly takes place in the European Commission and less so in the European Parliament and the European Council. The main explanatory factors enabling evaluation use relate to the system’s formalization of evaluation implementation and use; these factors ensure evaluation quality, timeliness and capacity in the Commission. At the same time, however, the system’s formalization also impedes evaluation use, reducing the direct influence of evaluations on policy-making and effectively ‘de-politicizing’ programme evaluations and largely limiting their use to the level of programme management.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalEvaluation: The International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice
    Volume20
    Issue number4
    Pages (from-to)428-446
    ISSN1356-3890
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2014

    Cite this

    @article{5b11763d39dd4b7e9cdecc198e6d12ee,
    title = "Evaluation Use in Evaluation Systems: The Case of the European Commission",
    abstract = "This article investigates the European Union’s evaluation system and its conduciveness to evaluation use. Taking the European Commission’s LIFE programme as its case, the article makes an empirical contribution to an emerging focus in the literature on the importance of organization and institutions when analyzing evaluation use. By focusing on the European Union’s evaluation system the article finds that evaluation use mainly takes place in the European Commission and less so in the European Parliament and the European Council. The main explanatory factors enabling evaluation use relate to the system’s formalization of evaluation implementation and use; these factors ensure evaluation quality, timeliness and capacity in the Commission. At the same time, however, the system’s formalization also impedes evaluation use, reducing the direct influence of evaluations on policy-making and effectively ‘de-politicizing’ programme evaluations and largely limiting their use to the level of programme management.",
    keywords = "European Commission, Evaluation systems, Evaluation use, LIFE programme, Programme management",
    author = "Steven H{\o}jlund",
    year = "2014",
    month = "10",
    doi = "10.1177/1356389014550562",
    language = "English",
    volume = "20",
    pages = "428--446",
    journal = "Evaluation: The International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice",
    issn = "1356-3890",
    publisher = "Sage Publications Ltd.",
    number = "4",

    }

    Evaluation Use in Evaluation Systems : The Case of the European Commission. / Højlund, Steven.

    In: Evaluation: The International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, Vol. 20, No. 4, 10.2014, p. 428-446.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Evaluation Use in Evaluation Systems

    T2 - The Case of the European Commission

    AU - Højlund, Steven

    PY - 2014/10

    Y1 - 2014/10

    N2 - This article investigates the European Union’s evaluation system and its conduciveness to evaluation use. Taking the European Commission’s LIFE programme as its case, the article makes an empirical contribution to an emerging focus in the literature on the importance of organization and institutions when analyzing evaluation use. By focusing on the European Union’s evaluation system the article finds that evaluation use mainly takes place in the European Commission and less so in the European Parliament and the European Council. The main explanatory factors enabling evaluation use relate to the system’s formalization of evaluation implementation and use; these factors ensure evaluation quality, timeliness and capacity in the Commission. At the same time, however, the system’s formalization also impedes evaluation use, reducing the direct influence of evaluations on policy-making and effectively ‘de-politicizing’ programme evaluations and largely limiting their use to the level of programme management.

    AB - This article investigates the European Union’s evaluation system and its conduciveness to evaluation use. Taking the European Commission’s LIFE programme as its case, the article makes an empirical contribution to an emerging focus in the literature on the importance of organization and institutions when analyzing evaluation use. By focusing on the European Union’s evaluation system the article finds that evaluation use mainly takes place in the European Commission and less so in the European Parliament and the European Council. The main explanatory factors enabling evaluation use relate to the system’s formalization of evaluation implementation and use; these factors ensure evaluation quality, timeliness and capacity in the Commission. At the same time, however, the system’s formalization also impedes evaluation use, reducing the direct influence of evaluations on policy-making and effectively ‘de-politicizing’ programme evaluations and largely limiting their use to the level of programme management.

    KW - European Commission

    KW - Evaluation systems

    KW - Evaluation use

    KW - LIFE programme

    KW - Programme management

    U2 - 10.1177/1356389014550562

    DO - 10.1177/1356389014550562

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 20

    SP - 428

    EP - 446

    JO - Evaluation: The International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice

    JF - Evaluation: The International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice

    SN - 1356-3890

    IS - 4

    ER -