Evaluating Flexible Learning in Terms of Course Quality

Betty Collis, Anoush Margaryan

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearch

Abstract

Learning becomes more flexible when options are offered to learners, not only about the time and place and pace of learning, but also relating to types and origins of study materials, to forms and quantity of learning activities and assignments, to ways of interacting with others within the course, and to forms of assessment. De Boer (2004) has analyzed flexible course delivery within universities and found that the most flexibility is found in logistic aspects of the course such as flexibility in dates by which assignments must be submitted or flexibility in the location of course meetings, whereas pedagogical flexibility in which the learner can tailor aspects of the learning process itself is still relatively little seen. Within companies, flexible learning is often described as e-learning or blended learning. In an analysis of literature about flexible learning in companies, Margaryan and Bianco (2002) found that e-learning typically involves logistic flexibility at the price of pedagogy: little or no options are available for social interaction, a direct relationship with an instructor, or for choice in types of learning activities and ways of carrying out those activities.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationFlexible Learning in an Information Society
EditorsBadrul H. Khan
Number of pages10
Place of PublicationHershey, PA
PublisherIGI global
Publication date2007
Pages272-281
Chapter26
ISBN (Print)9781599043258, 1599043254
ISBN (Electronic)9781599043272
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

CBS Library does not have access to the material

Cite this

Collis, B., & Margaryan, A. (2007). Evaluating Flexible Learning in Terms of Course Quality. In B. H. Khan (Ed.), Flexible Learning in an Information Society (pp. 272-281). Hershey, PA: IGI global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-325-8.ch026
Collis, Betty ; Margaryan, Anoush . / Evaluating Flexible Learning in Terms of Course Quality. Flexible Learning in an Information Society. editor / Badrul H. Khan. Hershey, PA : IGI global, 2007. pp. 272-281
@inbook{1f4e198e2acd485c8dcb3a22099f43c0,
title = "Evaluating Flexible Learning in Terms of Course Quality",
abstract = "Learning becomes more flexible when options are offered to learners, not only about the time and place and pace of learning, but also relating to types and origins of study materials, to forms and quantity of learning activities and assignments, to ways of interacting with others within the course, and to forms of assessment. De Boer (2004) has analyzed flexible course delivery within universities and found that the most flexibility is found in logistic aspects of the course such as flexibility in dates by which assignments must be submitted or flexibility in the location of course meetings, whereas pedagogical flexibility in which the learner can tailor aspects of the learning process itself is still relatively little seen. Within companies, flexible learning is often described as e-learning or blended learning. In an analysis of literature about flexible learning in companies, Margaryan and Bianco (2002) found that e-learning typically involves logistic flexibility at the price of pedagogy: little or no options are available for social interaction, a direct relationship with an instructor, or for choice in types of learning activities and ways of carrying out those activities.",
author = "Betty Collis and Anoush Margaryan",
note = "CBS Library does not have access to the material",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.4018/978-1-59904-325-8.ch026",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781599043258",
pages = "272--281",
editor = "Khan, {Badrul H.}",
booktitle = "Flexible Learning in an Information Society",
publisher = "IGI global",
address = "United States",

}

Collis, B & Margaryan, A 2007, Evaluating Flexible Learning in Terms of Course Quality. in BH Khan (ed.), Flexible Learning in an Information Society. IGI global, Hershey, PA, pp. 272-281. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-325-8.ch026

Evaluating Flexible Learning in Terms of Course Quality. / Collis, Betty; Margaryan, Anoush .

Flexible Learning in an Information Society. ed. / Badrul H. Khan. Hershey, PA : IGI global, 2007. p. 272-281.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearch

TY - CHAP

T1 - Evaluating Flexible Learning in Terms of Course Quality

AU - Collis, Betty

AU - Margaryan, Anoush

N1 - CBS Library does not have access to the material

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Learning becomes more flexible when options are offered to learners, not only about the time and place and pace of learning, but also relating to types and origins of study materials, to forms and quantity of learning activities and assignments, to ways of interacting with others within the course, and to forms of assessment. De Boer (2004) has analyzed flexible course delivery within universities and found that the most flexibility is found in logistic aspects of the course such as flexibility in dates by which assignments must be submitted or flexibility in the location of course meetings, whereas pedagogical flexibility in which the learner can tailor aspects of the learning process itself is still relatively little seen. Within companies, flexible learning is often described as e-learning or blended learning. In an analysis of literature about flexible learning in companies, Margaryan and Bianco (2002) found that e-learning typically involves logistic flexibility at the price of pedagogy: little or no options are available for social interaction, a direct relationship with an instructor, or for choice in types of learning activities and ways of carrying out those activities.

AB - Learning becomes more flexible when options are offered to learners, not only about the time and place and pace of learning, but also relating to types and origins of study materials, to forms and quantity of learning activities and assignments, to ways of interacting with others within the course, and to forms of assessment. De Boer (2004) has analyzed flexible course delivery within universities and found that the most flexibility is found in logistic aspects of the course such as flexibility in dates by which assignments must be submitted or flexibility in the location of course meetings, whereas pedagogical flexibility in which the learner can tailor aspects of the learning process itself is still relatively little seen. Within companies, flexible learning is often described as e-learning or blended learning. In an analysis of literature about flexible learning in companies, Margaryan and Bianco (2002) found that e-learning typically involves logistic flexibility at the price of pedagogy: little or no options are available for social interaction, a direct relationship with an instructor, or for choice in types of learning activities and ways of carrying out those activities.

U2 - 10.4018/978-1-59904-325-8.ch026

DO - 10.4018/978-1-59904-325-8.ch026

M3 - Book chapter

SN - 9781599043258

SN - 1599043254

SP - 272

EP - 281

BT - Flexible Learning in an Information Society

A2 - Khan, Badrul H.

PB - IGI global

CY - Hershey, PA

ER -

Collis B, Margaryan A. Evaluating Flexible Learning in Terms of Course Quality. In Khan BH, editor, Flexible Learning in an Information Society. Hershey, PA: IGI global. 2007. p. 272-281 https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-325-8.ch026