Evading the Boomerang Effect: Using the Grant-back Clause to Further Generative Appropriability from Technology Licensing Deals

Keld Laursen, Solon Moreira, Toke Reichstein, Maria Isabella Leone

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    122 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Technology licensing agreements potentially can create future appropriability problems. Drawing on the appropriability literature, we argue that the inclusion of a grant-back clause in technology licensing agreements is an attempt to balance the gains from and protection of the focal firms’ technologies. We hypothesize that the closer the licensed technology is to the licensor’s core patented technologies, the more likely the licensing agreement will include a grant-back clause, while the closer the licensed technology is to the licensee’s core patent portfolio, the less likely the agreement will include a grant-back clause. We hypothesize also that technological uncertainty is a positive moderator in the decision to include a grant-back clause, if the licensed technology is close to either the licensee’s or the licensor’s core technologies. We employ a hierarchical nested decision model to test the hypotheses on a sample of 397 licensed technologies. This method allows us to model the choice to include a grant-back clause as nested in the decision about which technologies to license out. We find broad support for our theoretical arguments.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalOrganization Science
    Volume28
    Issue number3
    Pages (from-to)514-530
    Number of pages17
    ISSN1047-7039
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2017

    Keywords

    • Grant-back clause
    • Technology licensing
    • Core technology
    • Appropriability

    Cite this

    @article{690d8943d2ce4bf482e9bf3619892d40,
    title = "Evading the Boomerang Effect: Using the Grant-back Clause to Further Generative Appropriability from Technology Licensing Deals",
    abstract = "Technology licensing agreements potentially can create future appropriability problems. Drawing on the appropriability literature, we argue that the inclusion of a grant-back clause in technology licensing agreements is an attempt to balance the gains from and protection of the focal firms’ technologies. We hypothesize that the closer the licensed technology is to the licensor’s core patented technologies, the more likely the licensing agreement will include a grant-back clause, while the closer the licensed technology is to the licensee’s core patent portfolio, the less likely the agreement will include a grant-back clause. We hypothesize also that technological uncertainty is a positive moderator in the decision to include a grant-back clause, if the licensed technology is close to either the licensee’s or the licensor’s core technologies. We employ a hierarchical nested decision model to test the hypotheses on a sample of 397 licensed technologies. This method allows us to model the choice to include a grant-back clause as nested in the decision about which technologies to license out. We find broad support for our theoretical arguments.",
    keywords = "Grant-back clause, Technology licensing, Core technology, Appropriability, Grant-back clause, Technology licensing, Core technology, Appropriability",
    author = "Keld Laursen and Solon Moreira and Toke Reichstein and Leone, {Maria Isabella}",
    year = "2017",
    doi = "10.1287/orsc.2017.1130",
    language = "English",
    volume = "28",
    pages = "514--530",
    journal = "Organization Science",
    issn = "1047-7039",
    publisher = "Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences",
    number = "3",

    }

    Evading the Boomerang Effect : Using the Grant-back Clause to Further Generative Appropriability from Technology Licensing Deals. / Laursen, Keld; Moreira, Solon; Reichstein, Toke; Leone, Maria Isabella.

    In: Organization Science, Vol. 28, No. 3, 2017, p. 514-530.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Evading the Boomerang Effect

    T2 - Using the Grant-back Clause to Further Generative Appropriability from Technology Licensing Deals

    AU - Laursen, Keld

    AU - Moreira, Solon

    AU - Reichstein, Toke

    AU - Leone, Maria Isabella

    PY - 2017

    Y1 - 2017

    N2 - Technology licensing agreements potentially can create future appropriability problems. Drawing on the appropriability literature, we argue that the inclusion of a grant-back clause in technology licensing agreements is an attempt to balance the gains from and protection of the focal firms’ technologies. We hypothesize that the closer the licensed technology is to the licensor’s core patented technologies, the more likely the licensing agreement will include a grant-back clause, while the closer the licensed technology is to the licensee’s core patent portfolio, the less likely the agreement will include a grant-back clause. We hypothesize also that technological uncertainty is a positive moderator in the decision to include a grant-back clause, if the licensed technology is close to either the licensee’s or the licensor’s core technologies. We employ a hierarchical nested decision model to test the hypotheses on a sample of 397 licensed technologies. This method allows us to model the choice to include a grant-back clause as nested in the decision about which technologies to license out. We find broad support for our theoretical arguments.

    AB - Technology licensing agreements potentially can create future appropriability problems. Drawing on the appropriability literature, we argue that the inclusion of a grant-back clause in technology licensing agreements is an attempt to balance the gains from and protection of the focal firms’ technologies. We hypothesize that the closer the licensed technology is to the licensor’s core patented technologies, the more likely the licensing agreement will include a grant-back clause, while the closer the licensed technology is to the licensee’s core patent portfolio, the less likely the agreement will include a grant-back clause. We hypothesize also that technological uncertainty is a positive moderator in the decision to include a grant-back clause, if the licensed technology is close to either the licensee’s or the licensor’s core technologies. We employ a hierarchical nested decision model to test the hypotheses on a sample of 397 licensed technologies. This method allows us to model the choice to include a grant-back clause as nested in the decision about which technologies to license out. We find broad support for our theoretical arguments.

    KW - Grant-back clause

    KW - Technology licensing

    KW - Core technology

    KW - Appropriability

    KW - Grant-back clause

    KW - Technology licensing

    KW - Core technology

    KW - Appropriability

    UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954921418483&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

    U2 - 10.1287/orsc.2017.1130

    DO - 10.1287/orsc.2017.1130

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 28

    SP - 514

    EP - 530

    JO - Organization Science

    JF - Organization Science

    SN - 1047-7039

    IS - 3

    ER -