Ethnography as Empirical Philosophy: Studying Samsø’s Renewable Energy Transition

Research output: Other contributionNet publication - Internet publicationResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This case study is based on my methodological reflections during and after conducting ethnographic fieldwork on Samsø, Denmark’s Renewable Energy Island, for my doctoral thesis. Interested in how the citizens of Samsø managed to “renew” their island through the installation of new energy infrastructures and in how the island’s subsequent status as a globally renowned renewable energy transition role model was managed, the fieldwork proved a continually evolving process of knowledge formation. In this case study, I discuss the process of knowledge production through a distinction between “traditional ethnography” and “ethnography as empirical philosophy.” The latter describes my ethnographic journey as characterized by relations of complicity with my research subjects, by difficulties with keeping the different stages of the research project separate (perhaps these distinctions were fragile constructs to begin with), and by the need for alternative evaluative criteria prioritizing surprise and flexibility over a rigorous and systematic research plan. Importantly, these seeming troubles of the research process, in an “empirical philosophy” perspective, become productive moments of knowledge formation where new insights are generated. As a pedagogical tool, the case highlights not only the challenges but also the benefits of working exploratively in such a way that the object of study is not fixated or narrowly defined but rather allowed to emerge and take different shapes in the course of the fieldwork process.
This case study is based on my methodological reflections during and after conducting ethnographic fieldwork on Samsø, Denmark’s Renewable Energy Island, for my doctoral thesis. Interested in how the citizens of Samsø managed to “renew” their island through the installation of new energy infrastructures and in how the island’s subsequent status as a globally renowned renewable energy transition role model was managed, the fieldwork proved a continually evolving process of knowledge formation. In this case study, I discuss the process of knowledge production through a distinction between “traditional ethnography” and “ethnography as empirical philosophy.” The latter describes my ethnographic journey as characterized by relations of complicity with my research subjects, by difficulties with keeping the different stages of the research project separate (perhaps these distinctions were fragile constructs to begin with), and by the need for alternative evaluative criteria prioritizing surprise and flexibility over a rigorous and systematic research plan. Importantly, these seeming troubles of the research process, in an “empirical philosophy” perspective, become productive moments of knowledge formation where new insights are generated. As a pedagogical tool, the case highlights not only the challenges but also the benefits of working exploratively in such a way that the object of study is not fixated or narrowly defined but rather allowed to emerge and take different shapes in the course of the fieldwork process.
LanguageEnglish
Date2019
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherSAGE Publications
ISBN (Electronic)9781526495532
DOIs
StatePublished - 2019
SeriesSAGE Research Methods Cases Part 2

Bibliographical note

CBS Library does not have access to the material

Keywords

  • Renewable energy

Cite this

@misc{b49e08a1d2e34127bc5cc6761f4787b3,
title = "Ethnography as Empirical Philosophy: Studying Sams{\o}’s Renewable Energy Transition",
abstract = "This case study is based on my methodological reflections during and after conducting ethnographic fieldwork on Sams{\o}, Denmark’s Renewable Energy Island, for my doctoral thesis. Interested in how the citizens of Sams{\o} managed to “renew” their island through the installation of new energy infrastructures and in how the island’s subsequent status as a globally renowned renewable energy transition role model was managed, the fieldwork proved a continually evolving process of knowledge formation. In this case study, I discuss the process of knowledge production through a distinction between “traditional ethnography” and “ethnography as empirical philosophy.” The latter describes my ethnographic journey as characterized by relations of complicity with my research subjects, by difficulties with keeping the different stages of the research project separate (perhaps these distinctions were fragile constructs to begin with), and by the need for alternative evaluative criteria prioritizing surprise and flexibility over a rigorous and systematic research plan. Importantly, these seeming troubles of the research process, in an “empirical philosophy” perspective, become productive moments of knowledge formation where new insights are generated. As a pedagogical tool, the case highlights not only the challenges but also the benefits of working exploratively in such a way that the object of study is not fixated or narrowly defined but rather allowed to emerge and take different shapes in the course of the fieldwork process.",
keywords = "Renewable energy, Renewable energy",
author = "Irina Papazu",
note = "CBS Library does not have access to the material",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.4135/9781526495532",
language = "English",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
address = "United Kingdom",
type = "Other",

}

Ethnography as Empirical Philosophy : Studying Samsø’s Renewable Energy Transition. / Papazu, Irina .

London : SAGE Publications. 2019, Case.

Research output: Other contributionNet publication - Internet publicationResearchpeer-review

TY - ICOMM

T1 - Ethnography as Empirical Philosophy

T2 - Studying Samsø’s Renewable Energy Transition

AU - Papazu,Irina

N1 - CBS Library does not have access to the material

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - This case study is based on my methodological reflections during and after conducting ethnographic fieldwork on Samsø, Denmark’s Renewable Energy Island, for my doctoral thesis. Interested in how the citizens of Samsø managed to “renew” their island through the installation of new energy infrastructures and in how the island’s subsequent status as a globally renowned renewable energy transition role model was managed, the fieldwork proved a continually evolving process of knowledge formation. In this case study, I discuss the process of knowledge production through a distinction between “traditional ethnography” and “ethnography as empirical philosophy.” The latter describes my ethnographic journey as characterized by relations of complicity with my research subjects, by difficulties with keeping the different stages of the research project separate (perhaps these distinctions were fragile constructs to begin with), and by the need for alternative evaluative criteria prioritizing surprise and flexibility over a rigorous and systematic research plan. Importantly, these seeming troubles of the research process, in an “empirical philosophy” perspective, become productive moments of knowledge formation where new insights are generated. As a pedagogical tool, the case highlights not only the challenges but also the benefits of working exploratively in such a way that the object of study is not fixated or narrowly defined but rather allowed to emerge and take different shapes in the course of the fieldwork process.

AB - This case study is based on my methodological reflections during and after conducting ethnographic fieldwork on Samsø, Denmark’s Renewable Energy Island, for my doctoral thesis. Interested in how the citizens of Samsø managed to “renew” their island through the installation of new energy infrastructures and in how the island’s subsequent status as a globally renowned renewable energy transition role model was managed, the fieldwork proved a continually evolving process of knowledge formation. In this case study, I discuss the process of knowledge production through a distinction between “traditional ethnography” and “ethnography as empirical philosophy.” The latter describes my ethnographic journey as characterized by relations of complicity with my research subjects, by difficulties with keeping the different stages of the research project separate (perhaps these distinctions were fragile constructs to begin with), and by the need for alternative evaluative criteria prioritizing surprise and flexibility over a rigorous and systematic research plan. Importantly, these seeming troubles of the research process, in an “empirical philosophy” perspective, become productive moments of knowledge formation where new insights are generated. As a pedagogical tool, the case highlights not only the challenges but also the benefits of working exploratively in such a way that the object of study is not fixated or narrowly defined but rather allowed to emerge and take different shapes in the course of the fieldwork process.

KW - Renewable energy

KW - Renewable energy

U2 - 10.4135/9781526495532

DO - 10.4135/9781526495532

M3 - Net publication - Internet publication

PB - SAGE Publications

CY - London

ER -