Essays on Stock Issuance

Niklas Kohl

Research output: Book/ReportPh.D. thesisResearch

Abstract

Firms which issue new equity subsequently have lower returns than other firms, but does the strength of the issuance effect vary in the cross section of firms? The essay shows, that US firms with characteristics that makes them “hard to value” have returns which are strongly related to their past issuance activity, while the return of “easy to value” firms are less related to their past issuance activity. In most cases the difference between “hard to value” and “easy to value” firms are signiffcant. As proxies for “hard to value”, I use three different types of firm characteristics. First, I consider firms for which relatively little information is available as “hard to value”. Examples are firms covered by few analysts and small firms. Second, I consider firms with high levels of analyst disagreement on stock price target, next quarter earnings per share and share recommendation as “hard to value”. Third, firms with expected cash flows in the more distant future are “hard to value”. These include firms with low earnings, high asset growth, and low dividend yield.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationFrederiksberg
PublisherCopenhagen Business School [Phd]
Number of pages190
ISBN (Print)9788793579484
ISBN (Electronic)9788793579491
Publication statusPublished - 2017
SeriesPhD series
Number38.2017
ISSN0906-6934

Cite this

Kohl, N. (2017). Essays on Stock Issuance. Frederiksberg: Copenhagen Business School [Phd]. PhD series, No. 38.2017
Kohl, Niklas. / Essays on Stock Issuance. Frederiksberg : Copenhagen Business School [Phd], 2017. 190 p. (PhD series; No. 38.2017).
@phdthesis{905f728471c148688c0258bbd2c3e3b0,
title = "Essays on Stock Issuance",
abstract = "Firms which issue new equity subsequently have lower returns than other firms, but does the strength of the issuance effect vary in the cross section of firms? The essay shows, that US firms with characteristics that makes them “hard to value” have returns which are strongly related to their past issuance activity, while the return of “easy to value” firms are less related to their past issuance activity. In most cases the difference between “hard to value” and “easy to value” firms are signiffcant. As proxies for “hard to value”, I use three different types of firm characteristics. First, I consider firms for which relatively little information is available as “hard to value”. Examples are firms covered by few analysts and small firms. Second, I consider firms with high levels of analyst disagreement on stock price target, next quarter earnings per share and share recommendation as “hard to value”. Third, firms with expected cash flows in the more distant future are “hard to value”. These include firms with low earnings, high asset growth, and low dividend yield.",
author = "Niklas Kohl",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
isbn = "9788793579484",
publisher = "Copenhagen Business School [Phd]",
address = "Denmark",

}

Kohl, N 2017, Essays on Stock Issuance. PhD series, no. 38.2017, Copenhagen Business School [Phd], Frederiksberg.

Essays on Stock Issuance. / Kohl, Niklas.

Frederiksberg : Copenhagen Business School [Phd], 2017. 190 p. (PhD series; No. 38.2017).

Research output: Book/ReportPh.D. thesisResearch

TY - BOOK

T1 - Essays on Stock Issuance

AU - Kohl, Niklas

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Firms which issue new equity subsequently have lower returns than other firms, but does the strength of the issuance effect vary in the cross section of firms? The essay shows, that US firms with characteristics that makes them “hard to value” have returns which are strongly related to their past issuance activity, while the return of “easy to value” firms are less related to their past issuance activity. In most cases the difference between “hard to value” and “easy to value” firms are signiffcant. As proxies for “hard to value”, I use three different types of firm characteristics. First, I consider firms for which relatively little information is available as “hard to value”. Examples are firms covered by few analysts and small firms. Second, I consider firms with high levels of analyst disagreement on stock price target, next quarter earnings per share and share recommendation as “hard to value”. Third, firms with expected cash flows in the more distant future are “hard to value”. These include firms with low earnings, high asset growth, and low dividend yield.

AB - Firms which issue new equity subsequently have lower returns than other firms, but does the strength of the issuance effect vary in the cross section of firms? The essay shows, that US firms with characteristics that makes them “hard to value” have returns which are strongly related to their past issuance activity, while the return of “easy to value” firms are less related to their past issuance activity. In most cases the difference between “hard to value” and “easy to value” firms are signiffcant. As proxies for “hard to value”, I use three different types of firm characteristics. First, I consider firms for which relatively little information is available as “hard to value”. Examples are firms covered by few analysts and small firms. Second, I consider firms with high levels of analyst disagreement on stock price target, next quarter earnings per share and share recommendation as “hard to value”. Third, firms with expected cash flows in the more distant future are “hard to value”. These include firms with low earnings, high asset growth, and low dividend yield.

UR - https://primo.kb.dk/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=CBS01000784796&context=L&vid=CBS&search_scope=Blended&tab=default_tab&lang=en_US

M3 - Ph.D. thesis

SN - 9788793579484

BT - Essays on Stock Issuance

PB - Copenhagen Business School [Phd]

CY - Frederiksberg

ER -

Kohl N. Essays on Stock Issuance. Frederiksberg: Copenhagen Business School [Phd], 2017. 190 p. (PhD series; No. 38.2017).