Equilibrium vs Evolution in the Resource-Based Perspective: The Conflicting Legacies of Demsetz and Penrose

    Research output: Working paperResearch

    Abstract

    This paper argues that not only Edith Penrose, but also Harold Demsetz should be seen as a dominant source of inspiration for RBP scholars, that these two crucial influences hold different and even conflicting views of the economic process, and that they helped found different research areas and research approaches within the RBP. Based on this discussion, the paper argues that the conflicting legacies of Penrose and Demsetz threathen the coherence of the RBP, that a central problem in the RBP is the lack of understanding of the process of resource-creation which tends to give the perspective a retrospective character, but that work on technological innovation and change, framed in the broader theoretical context of Austrian and evolutionary economics, may help remedy this shortcoming.
    Original languageEnglish
    Place of PublicationFrederiksberg
    PublisherDRUID - Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics
    Number of pages30
    ISBN (Print)8778730295
    Publication statusPublished - 1997
    SeriesDRUID Working Paper
    Number97-10

    Keywords

    • Evolutionary economics
    • Competences
    • Ressource-based perspective

    Cite this

    Foss, N. J. (1997). Equilibrium vs Evolution in the Resource-Based Perspective: The Conflicting Legacies of Demsetz and Penrose. DRUID - Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics. DRUID Working Paper, No. 97-10