Endogeneity in Strategy-Performance Analysis

An Application to Initial Human Capital Strategy and New Venture Performance

Vera Rocha, Mirjam Van Praag, Timothy B. Folta, Anabela Carneiro

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Managers engage in a variety of strategies, not randomly, but having in mind their performance implications. Therefore, strategic choices are endogenous in performance equations. Despite increasing efforts by various scholars in solving endogeneity bias, prior attempts have almost exclusively focused on single, one-sided, and discrete (binary) organizational decisions. Yet, in reality, managers often face multiple, simultaneous, and interdependent decisions, possibly including a continuous choice set. These choices may further entail a two-sided process between managers and others, such as employees, strategic partners, customers, or investors, whose choices and preferences also affect the final decision. We discuss how endogeneity can plague the measurement of the performance effects of these two-sided strategic decisions—which are more complex, but more realistic, than prior representations of organizational decision making. We provide an empirical demonstration of possible methods to deal with three different sources of bias, by analyzing the performance effects of two human capital choices made by founders at startup: the size and average quality of the initial workforce.
Original languageEnglish
JournalOrganizational Research Methods
Volume22
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)740-764
Number of pages25
ISSN1094-4281
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2019

Bibliographical note

Published online: 11. February 2018

Keywords

  • Endogeneity
  • Human capital choices
  • Selection effects
  • Simultaneous equations
  • Strategy-performance effects

Cite this

@article{37db9d7681d3449696e2791fb4638dfe,
title = "Endogeneity in Strategy-Performance Analysis: An Application to Initial Human Capital Strategy and New Venture Performance",
abstract = "Managers engage in a variety of strategies, not randomly, but having in mind their performance implications. Therefore, strategic choices are endogenous in performance equations. Despite increasing efforts by various scholars in solving endogeneity bias, prior attempts have almost exclusively focused on single, one-sided, and discrete (binary) organizational decisions. Yet, in reality, managers often face multiple, simultaneous, and interdependent decisions, possibly including a continuous choice set. These choices may further entail a two-sided process between managers and others, such as employees, strategic partners, customers, or investors, whose choices and preferences also affect the final decision. We discuss how endogeneity can plague the measurement of the performance effects of these two-sided strategic decisions—which are more complex, but more realistic, than prior representations of organizational decision making. We provide an empirical demonstration of possible methods to deal with three different sources of bias, by analyzing the performance effects of two human capital choices made by founders at startup: the size and average quality of the initial workforce.",
keywords = "Endogeneity, Human capital choices, Selection effects, Simultaneous equations, Strategy-performance effects, Endogeneity, Human capital choices, Selection effects, Simultaneous equations, Strategy-performance effects",
author = "Vera Rocha and {Van Praag}, Mirjam and {B. Folta}, Timothy and Anabela Carneiro",
note = "Published online: 11. February 2018",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1177/1094428118757313",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "740--764",
journal = "Organizational Research Methods",
issn = "1094-4281",
publisher = "Sage Publications, Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Endogeneity in Strategy-Performance Analysis : An Application to Initial Human Capital Strategy and New Venture Performance. / Rocha, Vera; Van Praag, Mirjam; B. Folta, Timothy; Carneiro, Anabela.

In: Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 22, No. 3, 07.2019, p. 740-764.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Endogeneity in Strategy-Performance Analysis

T2 - An Application to Initial Human Capital Strategy and New Venture Performance

AU - Rocha, Vera

AU - Van Praag, Mirjam

AU - B. Folta, Timothy

AU - Carneiro, Anabela

N1 - Published online: 11. February 2018

PY - 2019/7

Y1 - 2019/7

N2 - Managers engage in a variety of strategies, not randomly, but having in mind their performance implications. Therefore, strategic choices are endogenous in performance equations. Despite increasing efforts by various scholars in solving endogeneity bias, prior attempts have almost exclusively focused on single, one-sided, and discrete (binary) organizational decisions. Yet, in reality, managers often face multiple, simultaneous, and interdependent decisions, possibly including a continuous choice set. These choices may further entail a two-sided process between managers and others, such as employees, strategic partners, customers, or investors, whose choices and preferences also affect the final decision. We discuss how endogeneity can plague the measurement of the performance effects of these two-sided strategic decisions—which are more complex, but more realistic, than prior representations of organizational decision making. We provide an empirical demonstration of possible methods to deal with three different sources of bias, by analyzing the performance effects of two human capital choices made by founders at startup: the size and average quality of the initial workforce.

AB - Managers engage in a variety of strategies, not randomly, but having in mind their performance implications. Therefore, strategic choices are endogenous in performance equations. Despite increasing efforts by various scholars in solving endogeneity bias, prior attempts have almost exclusively focused on single, one-sided, and discrete (binary) organizational decisions. Yet, in reality, managers often face multiple, simultaneous, and interdependent decisions, possibly including a continuous choice set. These choices may further entail a two-sided process between managers and others, such as employees, strategic partners, customers, or investors, whose choices and preferences also affect the final decision. We discuss how endogeneity can plague the measurement of the performance effects of these two-sided strategic decisions—which are more complex, but more realistic, than prior representations of organizational decision making. We provide an empirical demonstration of possible methods to deal with three different sources of bias, by analyzing the performance effects of two human capital choices made by founders at startup: the size and average quality of the initial workforce.

KW - Endogeneity

KW - Human capital choices

KW - Selection effects

KW - Simultaneous equations

KW - Strategy-performance effects

KW - Endogeneity

KW - Human capital choices

KW - Selection effects

KW - Simultaneous equations

KW - Strategy-performance effects

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=963017738160

U2 - 10.1177/1094428118757313

DO - 10.1177/1094428118757313

M3 - Journal article

VL - 22

SP - 740

EP - 764

JO - Organizational Research Methods

JF - Organizational Research Methods

SN - 1094-4281

IS - 3

ER -