@techreport{f6a004b0fb6e11deae57000ea68e967b,
title = "Eliciting Beliefs: Theory and Experiments",
abstract = "Subjective beliefs play a role in many economic decisions. There is a large theoretical literature on the elicitation of beliefs, and an equally large empirical literature. However, there is a gulf between the two. The theoretical literature proposes a range of procedures that can be used to recover beliefs, but stresses the need to make strong auxiliary assumptions or “calibrating adjustments” to elicited reports in order to recover the latent belief. With some notable exceptions, the empirical literature seems intent on either making those strong assumptions or ignoring the need for calibration. We make three contributions to bridge this gulf. First, we offer a general theoretical framework in which the belief elicitation task can be viewed as an exchange of state-dependent commodities between two traders. Second, we provide a specific elicitation procedure which has clear counterparts in field betting environments, and that is directly motivated by our theoretical framework. Finally, we illustrate how one can jointly estimate risk attitudes and subjective beliefs using structural maximum likelihood methods. This allows the observer to make inferences about the latent subjective belief, calibrating for virtually any well-specified model of choice under uncertainty. We demonstrate our procedures with an experiment in which we elicit subjective probabilities over three future events and one fact.",
author = "Steffen Andersen and John Fountain and Harrison, {Glenn W.} and Rutstr{\"o}m, {E. Elisabet}",
year = "2009",
language = "English",
series = "Working Paper / Department of Economics. Copenhagen Business School",
publisher = "Department of Economics. Copenhagen Business School",
number = "3-2009",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Department of Economics. Copenhagen Business School",
}