Effects of Meaning and Symmetry on Judgments of Size

Rolf Reber, Bo T. Christensen, Beat Meier

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Research has shown that people judge words as having bigger font size than non-words. This finding has been interpreted in terms of processing fluency, with higher fluency leading to judgments of bigger size. If so, symmetric numbers (e.g., 44) which can be processed more fluently are predicted to be judged as larger than asymmetric numbers (e.g., 43). However, recent research found that symmetric numbers were judged to be smaller than asymmetric numbers. This finding suggests that the mechanisms underlying size judgments may differ in meaningful and meaningless materials. Supporting this notion, we showed in Experiment 1 that meaning increased judged size, whereas symmetry decreased judged size. In the next two experiments, we excluded several alternative explanations for the differences in size judgments between meaningful and meaningless materials in earlier studies. This finding contradicts the notion that the mechanism underlying judgments of size is processing fluency.
Research has shown that people judge words as having bigger font size than non-words. This finding has been interpreted in terms of processing fluency, with higher fluency leading to judgments of bigger size. If so, symmetric numbers (e.g., 44) which can be processed more fluently are predicted to be judged as larger than asymmetric numbers (e.g., 43). However, recent research found that symmetric numbers were judged to be smaller than asymmetric numbers. This finding suggests that the mechanisms underlying size judgments may differ in meaningful and meaningless materials. Supporting this notion, we showed in Experiment 1 that meaning increased judged size, whereas symmetry decreased judged size. In the next two experiments, we excluded several alternative explanations for the differences in size judgments between meaningful and meaningless materials in earlier studies. This finding contradicts the notion that the mechanism underlying judgments of size is processing fluency.
LanguageEnglish
Article number1270
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume5
Number of pages6
ISSN1664-1078
DOIs
StatePublished - 4 Nov 2014

Keywords

  • Number processing
  • Processing fluency
  • Size perception
  • Symmetry

Cite this

@article{d7b1f2c1fd5a4e8aad95c99550c4567d,
title = "Effects of Meaning and Symmetry on Judgments of Size",
abstract = "Research has shown that people judge words as having bigger font size than non-words. This finding has been interpreted in terms of processing fluency, with higher fluency leading to judgments of bigger size. If so, symmetric numbers (e.g., 44) which can be processed more fluently are predicted to be judged as larger than asymmetric numbers (e.g., 43). However, recent research found that symmetric numbers were judged to be smaller than asymmetric numbers. This finding suggests that the mechanisms underlying size judgments may differ in meaningful and meaningless materials. Supporting this notion, we showed in Experiment 1 that meaning increased judged size, whereas symmetry decreased judged size. In the next two experiments, we excluded several alternative explanations for the differences in size judgments between meaningful and meaningless materials in earlier studies. This finding contradicts the notion that the mechanism underlying judgments of size is processing fluency.",
keywords = "Number processing, Processing fluency, Size perception, Symmetry, Number processing, Processing fluency, Size perception, Symmetry",
author = "Rolf Reber and Christensen, {Bo T.} and Beat Meier",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
day = "4",
doi = "10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01270",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
journal = "Frontiers in Psychology",
issn = "1664-1078",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S.A.",

}

Effects of Meaning and Symmetry on Judgments of Size. / Reber, Rolf; Christensen, Bo T.; Meier, Beat.

In: Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 5, 1270, 04.11.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of Meaning and Symmetry on Judgments of Size

AU - Reber,Rolf

AU - Christensen,Bo T.

AU - Meier,Beat

PY - 2014/11/4

Y1 - 2014/11/4

N2 - Research has shown that people judge words as having bigger font size than non-words. This finding has been interpreted in terms of processing fluency, with higher fluency leading to judgments of bigger size. If so, symmetric numbers (e.g., 44) which can be processed more fluently are predicted to be judged as larger than asymmetric numbers (e.g., 43). However, recent research found that symmetric numbers were judged to be smaller than asymmetric numbers. This finding suggests that the mechanisms underlying size judgments may differ in meaningful and meaningless materials. Supporting this notion, we showed in Experiment 1 that meaning increased judged size, whereas symmetry decreased judged size. In the next two experiments, we excluded several alternative explanations for the differences in size judgments between meaningful and meaningless materials in earlier studies. This finding contradicts the notion that the mechanism underlying judgments of size is processing fluency.

AB - Research has shown that people judge words as having bigger font size than non-words. This finding has been interpreted in terms of processing fluency, with higher fluency leading to judgments of bigger size. If so, symmetric numbers (e.g., 44) which can be processed more fluently are predicted to be judged as larger than asymmetric numbers (e.g., 43). However, recent research found that symmetric numbers were judged to be smaller than asymmetric numbers. This finding suggests that the mechanisms underlying size judgments may differ in meaningful and meaningless materials. Supporting this notion, we showed in Experiment 1 that meaning increased judged size, whereas symmetry decreased judged size. In the next two experiments, we excluded several alternative explanations for the differences in size judgments between meaningful and meaningless materials in earlier studies. This finding contradicts the notion that the mechanism underlying judgments of size is processing fluency.

KW - Number processing

KW - Processing fluency

KW - Size perception

KW - Symmetry

KW - Number processing

KW - Processing fluency

KW - Size perception

KW - Symmetry

U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01270

DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01270

M3 - Journal article

VL - 5

JO - Frontiers in Psychology

T2 - Frontiers in Psychology

JF - Frontiers in Psychology

SN - 1664-1078

M1 - 1270

ER -