Editor, Executive and Entrepreneur: Strategic Paradoxes in the Digital Age

Tor Bøe-Lillegraven, Erik Wilberg

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    72 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    To survive in today’s increasingly complex business environments, firms must embrace strategic paradoxes: contradictory yet interrelated objectives that persist over time. This can be one of toughest of all leadership challenges, as managers must accept inconsistency and contradictions. In this article, we develop and empirically test a set of hypotheses related to ambidexterity, a key example of a paradoxical strategy. Through our analysis of data from a survey of executive leaders, we find a link between organizational ambidexterity and strategic planning, suggesting that the complexities of navigating in explorative ventures require more explicit strategy work than the old certainties of a legacy business. We identify and discuss inherent paradoxes and their implications for firm performance in 22 industry-specific strategies, where empirical industry data shows a pattern of conflict between explorative growth strategies and exploitative profit strategies. We argue that this is just one of the inherent paradoxes in the ambidexterity construct.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalNordicom Review
    Volume37
    Issue number2
    Pages (from-to)115-130
    ISSN1403-1108
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sep 2016

    Keywords

    • Ambidexterity
    • Leadership
    • Strategy
    • Paradoxes
    • Organizational change

    Cite this

    Bøe-Lillegraven, Tor ; Wilberg, Erik. / Editor, Executive and Entrepreneur : Strategic Paradoxes in the Digital Age. In: Nordicom Review. 2016 ; Vol. 37, No. 2. pp. 115-130.
    @article{ac2a9169d6914bc6a1e58f938da9cbbd,
    title = "Editor, Executive and Entrepreneur: Strategic Paradoxes in the Digital Age",
    abstract = "To survive in today’s increasingly complex business environments, firms must embrace strategic paradoxes: contradictory yet interrelated objectives that persist over time. This can be one of toughest of all leadership challenges, as managers must accept inconsistency and contradictions. In this article, we develop and empirically test a set of hypotheses related to ambidexterity, a key example of a paradoxical strategy. Through our analysis of data from a survey of executive leaders, we find a link between organizational ambidexterity and strategic planning, suggesting that the complexities of navigating in explorative ventures require more explicit strategy work than the old certainties of a legacy business. We identify and discuss inherent paradoxes and their implications for firm performance in 22 industry-specific strategies, where empirical industry data shows a pattern of conflict between explorative growth strategies and exploitative profit strategies. We argue that this is just one of the inherent paradoxes in the ambidexterity construct.",
    keywords = "Ambidexterity, Leadership, Strategy, Paradoxes, Organizational change, Ambidexterity, Leadership, Strategy, Paradoxes, Organizational change",
    author = "Tor B{\o}e-Lillegraven and Erik Wilberg",
    year = "2016",
    month = "9",
    doi = "10.1515/nor-2016-0014",
    language = "English",
    volume = "37",
    pages = "115--130",
    journal = "N O R D I C O M Review",
    issn = "1403-1108",
    publisher = "Nordicom",
    number = "2",

    }

    Editor, Executive and Entrepreneur : Strategic Paradoxes in the Digital Age. / Bøe-Lillegraven, Tor; Wilberg, Erik.

    In: Nordicom Review, Vol. 37, No. 2, 09.2016, p. 115-130.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Editor, Executive and Entrepreneur

    T2 - Strategic Paradoxes in the Digital Age

    AU - Bøe-Lillegraven, Tor

    AU - Wilberg, Erik

    PY - 2016/9

    Y1 - 2016/9

    N2 - To survive in today’s increasingly complex business environments, firms must embrace strategic paradoxes: contradictory yet interrelated objectives that persist over time. This can be one of toughest of all leadership challenges, as managers must accept inconsistency and contradictions. In this article, we develop and empirically test a set of hypotheses related to ambidexterity, a key example of a paradoxical strategy. Through our analysis of data from a survey of executive leaders, we find a link between organizational ambidexterity and strategic planning, suggesting that the complexities of navigating in explorative ventures require more explicit strategy work than the old certainties of a legacy business. We identify and discuss inherent paradoxes and their implications for firm performance in 22 industry-specific strategies, where empirical industry data shows a pattern of conflict between explorative growth strategies and exploitative profit strategies. We argue that this is just one of the inherent paradoxes in the ambidexterity construct.

    AB - To survive in today’s increasingly complex business environments, firms must embrace strategic paradoxes: contradictory yet interrelated objectives that persist over time. This can be one of toughest of all leadership challenges, as managers must accept inconsistency and contradictions. In this article, we develop and empirically test a set of hypotheses related to ambidexterity, a key example of a paradoxical strategy. Through our analysis of data from a survey of executive leaders, we find a link between organizational ambidexterity and strategic planning, suggesting that the complexities of navigating in explorative ventures require more explicit strategy work than the old certainties of a legacy business. We identify and discuss inherent paradoxes and their implications for firm performance in 22 industry-specific strategies, where empirical industry data shows a pattern of conflict between explorative growth strategies and exploitative profit strategies. We argue that this is just one of the inherent paradoxes in the ambidexterity construct.

    KW - Ambidexterity

    KW - Leadership

    KW - Strategy

    KW - Paradoxes

    KW - Organizational change

    KW - Ambidexterity

    KW - Leadership

    KW - Strategy

    KW - Paradoxes

    KW - Organizational change

    UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=991042732762622&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

    U2 - 10.1515/nor-2016-0014

    DO - 10.1515/nor-2016-0014

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 37

    SP - 115

    EP - 130

    JO - N O R D I C O M Review

    JF - N O R D I C O M Review

    SN - 1403-1108

    IS - 2

    ER -