Doing Ethnography in a Paranoid Organization: An Autoethnographic Account

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine what we can learn from an autoethnographical approach about public administration. In this context it presents and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of autoethnography.
    Design/methodology/approach – The paper is based on a case study of E-rail, a European national rail service subject to extensive negative press coverage. The autoethnographic accounts, based on interviews, observations, phone calls, e-mails, and other informal interactions with the organizational members, highlight the researcher’s entry to and exit of the organization.
    Findings – The paper mobilizes fieldwork access negotiation and trust building with participants as empirical material in its own right, arguing that challenges involving “being in the field” should be explored to provide new types of knowledge about the organizational phenomenon under study – in this case the rise of organizational paranoia.
    Originality/value – This paper uses autoethnography, which is rare in public administration studies, and discusses the distinct features of autoethnography as an ethnographic approach to public organizations. It argues that autoethnographic accounts of fieldwork relationship highlight and challenge the boundaries of the kind of research questions we might ask – and the kind of answers we might provide – about public administration.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalJournal of Organizational Ethnography
    Volume4
    Issue number2
    Pages (from-to)162-176
    Number of pages15
    ISSN2046-6749
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Cite this

    @article{d1370275008348fdb385d87589fb4a3c,
    title = "Doing Ethnography in a Paranoid Organization: An Autoethnographic Account",
    abstract = "Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine what we can learn from an autoethnographical approach about public administration. In this context it presents and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of autoethnography.Design/methodology/approach – The paper is based on a case study of E-rail, a European national rail service subject to extensive negative press coverage. The autoethnographic accounts, based on interviews, observations, phone calls, e-mails, and other informal interactions with the organizational members, highlight the researcher’s entry to and exit of the organization.Findings – The paper mobilizes fieldwork access negotiation and trust building with participants as empirical material in its own right, arguing that challenges involving “being in the field” should be explored to provide new types of knowledge about the organizational phenomenon under study – in this case the rise of organizational paranoia.Originality/value – This paper uses autoethnography, which is rare in public administration studies, and discusses the distinct features of autoethnography as an ethnographic approach to public organizations. It argues that autoethnographic accounts of fieldwork relationship highlight and challenge the boundaries of the kind of research questions we might ask – and the kind of answers we might provide – about public administration.",
    keywords = "Autoethnography, Organizational ethnography, Paranoia, Public administration , Ticket inspectors",
    author = "Sanne Frandsen",
    year = "2015",
    doi = "10.1108/JOE-07-2014-0020",
    language = "English",
    volume = "4",
    pages = "162--176",
    journal = "Journal of Organizational Ethnography",
    issn = "2046-6749",
    publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing",
    number = "2",

    }

    Doing Ethnography in a Paranoid Organization : An Autoethnographic Account. / Frandsen, Sanne.

    In: Journal of Organizational Ethnography, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2015, p. 162-176.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Doing Ethnography in a Paranoid Organization

    T2 - An Autoethnographic Account

    AU - Frandsen, Sanne

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine what we can learn from an autoethnographical approach about public administration. In this context it presents and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of autoethnography.Design/methodology/approach – The paper is based on a case study of E-rail, a European national rail service subject to extensive negative press coverage. The autoethnographic accounts, based on interviews, observations, phone calls, e-mails, and other informal interactions with the organizational members, highlight the researcher’s entry to and exit of the organization.Findings – The paper mobilizes fieldwork access negotiation and trust building with participants as empirical material in its own right, arguing that challenges involving “being in the field” should be explored to provide new types of knowledge about the organizational phenomenon under study – in this case the rise of organizational paranoia.Originality/value – This paper uses autoethnography, which is rare in public administration studies, and discusses the distinct features of autoethnography as an ethnographic approach to public organizations. It argues that autoethnographic accounts of fieldwork relationship highlight and challenge the boundaries of the kind of research questions we might ask – and the kind of answers we might provide – about public administration.

    AB - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine what we can learn from an autoethnographical approach about public administration. In this context it presents and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of autoethnography.Design/methodology/approach – The paper is based on a case study of E-rail, a European national rail service subject to extensive negative press coverage. The autoethnographic accounts, based on interviews, observations, phone calls, e-mails, and other informal interactions with the organizational members, highlight the researcher’s entry to and exit of the organization.Findings – The paper mobilizes fieldwork access negotiation and trust building with participants as empirical material in its own right, arguing that challenges involving “being in the field” should be explored to provide new types of knowledge about the organizational phenomenon under study – in this case the rise of organizational paranoia.Originality/value – This paper uses autoethnography, which is rare in public administration studies, and discusses the distinct features of autoethnography as an ethnographic approach to public organizations. It argues that autoethnographic accounts of fieldwork relationship highlight and challenge the boundaries of the kind of research questions we might ask – and the kind of answers we might provide – about public administration.

    KW - Autoethnography

    KW - Organizational ethnography

    KW - Paranoia

    KW - Public administration

    KW - Ticket inspectors

    UR - http://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=3280000000000364&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

    U2 - 10.1108/JOE-07-2014-0020

    DO - 10.1108/JOE-07-2014-0020

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 4

    SP - 162

    EP - 176

    JO - Journal of Organizational Ethnography

    JF - Journal of Organizational Ethnography

    SN - 2046-6749

    IS - 2

    ER -