Does Mother Know Best?

Parental Discrepancies in Assessing Child Behavioral and Educational Outcomes

Nabanita Datta Gupta, Mette Lausten, Dario Pozzoli

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

We investigate the degree of correspondence between parents’ reports on child behavioral and educational outcomes using wave four of a rich Danish longitudinal survey of children (the DALSC). All outcomes are measured at age 11 when the children are expected to be in fifth grade. Once discrepancies are detected, we analyze whether they are driven by noisy evaluations or by systematic bias, focusing on the role of parental characteristics and response heterogeneity. We then explicitly assess the relative importance of the mother’s versus the father’s assessments in explaining child academic performance and diagnosed mental health to investigate whether one parent is systematically a better informant of their child’s outcomes than the other. Our results show that parental psychopathology, measured as maternal distress, is a source of systematic misreporting of child functioning, that the parent–child relationship matters, and that mothers are not necessarily a better informant of child functioning than fathers. This last finding should not only be valid for Denmark but also for many other countries, where the father’s role in childcare has been growing.
Original languageEnglish
JournalReview of Economics of the Household
Volume16
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)407–425
Number of pages19
ISSN1569-5239
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2018

Keywords

  • Child development
  • Informant discrepancies
  • Reporting bias
  • Response heterogeneity

Cite this

@article{65f1f39215e64aa0be63a87b41b5b213,
title = "Does Mother Know Best?: Parental Discrepancies in Assessing Child Behavioral and Educational Outcomes",
abstract = "We investigate the degree of correspondence between parents’ reports on child behavioral and educational outcomes using wave four of a rich Danish longitudinal survey of children (the DALSC). All outcomes are measured at age 11 when the children are expected to be in fifth grade. Once discrepancies are detected, we analyze whether they are driven by noisy evaluations or by systematic bias, focusing on the role of parental characteristics and response heterogeneity. We then explicitly assess the relative importance of the mother’s versus the father’s assessments in explaining child academic performance and diagnosed mental health to investigate whether one parent is systematically a better informant of their child’s outcomes than the other. Our results show that parental psychopathology, measured as maternal distress, is a source of systematic misreporting of child functioning, that the parent–child relationship matters, and that mothers are not necessarily a better informant of child functioning than fathers. This last finding should not only be valid for Denmark but also for many other countries, where the father’s role in childcare has been growing.",
keywords = "Child development, Informant discrepancies, Reporting bias, Response heterogeneity, Child development, Informant discrepancies, Reporting bias, Response heterogeneity",
author = "Gupta, {Nabanita Datta} and Mette Lausten and Dario Pozzoli",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s11150-016-9341-1",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "407–425",
journal = "Review of Economics of the Household",
issn = "1569-5239",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "2",

}

Does Mother Know Best? Parental Discrepancies in Assessing Child Behavioral and Educational Outcomes. / Gupta, Nabanita Datta; Lausten, Mette; Pozzoli, Dario.

In: Review of Economics of the Household, Vol. 16, No. 2, 06.2018, p. 407–425.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does Mother Know Best?

T2 - Parental Discrepancies in Assessing Child Behavioral and Educational Outcomes

AU - Gupta, Nabanita Datta

AU - Lausten, Mette

AU - Pozzoli, Dario

PY - 2018/6

Y1 - 2018/6

N2 - We investigate the degree of correspondence between parents’ reports on child behavioral and educational outcomes using wave four of a rich Danish longitudinal survey of children (the DALSC). All outcomes are measured at age 11 when the children are expected to be in fifth grade. Once discrepancies are detected, we analyze whether they are driven by noisy evaluations or by systematic bias, focusing on the role of parental characteristics and response heterogeneity. We then explicitly assess the relative importance of the mother’s versus the father’s assessments in explaining child academic performance and diagnosed mental health to investigate whether one parent is systematically a better informant of their child’s outcomes than the other. Our results show that parental psychopathology, measured as maternal distress, is a source of systematic misreporting of child functioning, that the parent–child relationship matters, and that mothers are not necessarily a better informant of child functioning than fathers. This last finding should not only be valid for Denmark but also for many other countries, where the father’s role in childcare has been growing.

AB - We investigate the degree of correspondence between parents’ reports on child behavioral and educational outcomes using wave four of a rich Danish longitudinal survey of children (the DALSC). All outcomes are measured at age 11 when the children are expected to be in fifth grade. Once discrepancies are detected, we analyze whether they are driven by noisy evaluations or by systematic bias, focusing on the role of parental characteristics and response heterogeneity. We then explicitly assess the relative importance of the mother’s versus the father’s assessments in explaining child academic performance and diagnosed mental health to investigate whether one parent is systematically a better informant of their child’s outcomes than the other. Our results show that parental psychopathology, measured as maternal distress, is a source of systematic misreporting of child functioning, that the parent–child relationship matters, and that mothers are not necessarily a better informant of child functioning than fathers. This last finding should not only be valid for Denmark but also for many other countries, where the father’s role in childcare has been growing.

KW - Child development

KW - Informant discrepancies

KW - Reporting bias

KW - Response heterogeneity

KW - Child development

KW - Informant discrepancies

KW - Reporting bias

KW - Response heterogeneity

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=111034870123000&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1007/s11150-016-9341-1

DO - 10.1007/s11150-016-9341-1

M3 - Journal article

VL - 16

SP - 407

EP - 425

JO - Review of Economics of the Household

JF - Review of Economics of the Household

SN - 1569-5239

IS - 2

ER -