Do Women Make More Protectionist Trade Policy?

Timm Betz, David Fortunato, Diana Z. O’Brien

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

77 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Women have more protectionist trade preferences than men do. We assess whether this well-documented relationship between gender and protectionism in the mass public carries over into a relationship between women’s political representation and (a) party platforms, and (b) governments’ trade policy choices. Looking across countries and over time, we demonstrate that with an increase in women’s representation, political party trade policy positions become more protectionist. For government trade policy choices, we identify more nuanced results. The protectionist effect of women’s representation is limited to the most visible products: consumption goods. Women’s representation has no effect on intermediate inputs, where firm demands for trade liberalization are more pronounced and policy makers are thus constrained in implementing a protectionist agenda. These findings contribute to scholarship on the descriptive–substantive representation link, add a new dimension to our understanding of trade politics, and demonstrate the importance of applying a gendered lens to international political economy research.
Original languageEnglish
JournalAmerican Political Science Review
Volume117
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)1522-1530
Number of pages9
ISSN0003-0554
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2023

Cite this