Dimensions of Creative Evaluation

Distinct Design and Reasoning Strategies for Aesthetic, Functional and Originality Judgments

Bo Christensen, Linden J. Ball

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

We examined evaluative reasoning taking place during expert ‘design critiques’. We focused on key dimensions of creative evaluation (originality, functionality and aesthetics) and ways in which these dimensions impact reasoning strategies and suggestions offered by experts for how the student could continue. Each dimension was associated with a specific underpinning ‘logic’ determining how these dimensions were evaluated in practice. Our analysis clarified how these dimensions triggered reasoning strategies such as running mental simulations or making design suggestions, ranging from ‘go/kill’ decisions to loose recommendations to continue without directional steer. The findings advance our theoretical understanding of evaluation behaviour in design and alert practicing design evaluators to the nature and consequences of their critical appraisals.
Original languageEnglish
JournalDesign Studies
Volume45
Issue numberPart A
Pages (from-to)116-136
ISSN0142-694X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • Design critique
  • Design reasoning
  • Design evaluation
  • Evaluative practices
  • Mental simulation

Cite this

@article{250d16c24a694c7ea2d382a6352b2b62,
title = "Dimensions of Creative Evaluation: Distinct Design and Reasoning Strategies for Aesthetic, Functional and Originality Judgments",
abstract = "We examined evaluative reasoning taking place during expert ‘design critiques’. We focused on key dimensions of creative evaluation (originality, functionality and aesthetics) and ways in which these dimensions impact reasoning strategies and suggestions offered by experts for how the student could continue. Each dimension was associated with a specific underpinning ‘logic’ determining how these dimensions were evaluated in practice. Our analysis clarified how these dimensions triggered reasoning strategies such as running mental simulations or making design suggestions, ranging from ‘go/kill’ decisions to loose recommendations to continue without directional steer. The findings advance our theoretical understanding of evaluation behaviour in design and alert practicing design evaluators to the nature and consequences of their critical appraisals.",
keywords = "Design critique, Design reasoning, Design evaluation, Evaluative practices, Mental simulation, Design critique, Design reasoning, Design evaluation, Evaluative practices, Mental simulation",
author = "Bo Christensen and Ball, {Linden J.}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1016/j.destud.2015.12.005",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "116--136",
journal = "Design Studies",
issn = "0142-694X",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",
number = "Part A",

}

Dimensions of Creative Evaluation : Distinct Design and Reasoning Strategies for Aesthetic, Functional and Originality Judgments. / Christensen, Bo; Ball, Linden J.

In: Design Studies, Vol. 45, No. Part A, 2016, p. 116-136.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dimensions of Creative Evaluation

T2 - Distinct Design and Reasoning Strategies for Aesthetic, Functional and Originality Judgments

AU - Christensen, Bo

AU - Ball, Linden J.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - We examined evaluative reasoning taking place during expert ‘design critiques’. We focused on key dimensions of creative evaluation (originality, functionality and aesthetics) and ways in which these dimensions impact reasoning strategies and suggestions offered by experts for how the student could continue. Each dimension was associated with a specific underpinning ‘logic’ determining how these dimensions were evaluated in practice. Our analysis clarified how these dimensions triggered reasoning strategies such as running mental simulations or making design suggestions, ranging from ‘go/kill’ decisions to loose recommendations to continue without directional steer. The findings advance our theoretical understanding of evaluation behaviour in design and alert practicing design evaluators to the nature and consequences of their critical appraisals.

AB - We examined evaluative reasoning taking place during expert ‘design critiques’. We focused on key dimensions of creative evaluation (originality, functionality and aesthetics) and ways in which these dimensions impact reasoning strategies and suggestions offered by experts for how the student could continue. Each dimension was associated with a specific underpinning ‘logic’ determining how these dimensions were evaluated in practice. Our analysis clarified how these dimensions triggered reasoning strategies such as running mental simulations or making design suggestions, ranging from ‘go/kill’ decisions to loose recommendations to continue without directional steer. The findings advance our theoretical understanding of evaluation behaviour in design and alert practicing design evaluators to the nature and consequences of their critical appraisals.

KW - Design critique

KW - Design reasoning

KW - Design evaluation

KW - Evaluative practices

KW - Mental simulation

KW - Design critique

KW - Design reasoning

KW - Design evaluation

KW - Evaluative practices

KW - Mental simulation

UR - http://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954926228400

U2 - 10.1016/j.destud.2015.12.005

DO - 10.1016/j.destud.2015.12.005

M3 - Journal article

VL - 45

SP - 116

EP - 136

JO - Design Studies

JF - Design Studies

SN - 0142-694X

IS - Part A

ER -