Dialogues and the Problems of Knowing: Reinventing the Architectural Competition

Kristian Kreiner, Peter Holm Jacobsen, Daniel Toft Jensen

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

We describe and analyze the introduction of legitimate dialogues in architectural competitions. What happens to the competition when the contestants are allowed to interact with each other and with the competition jury? We consider dialogues to be a supplementary social technology that is becoming embedded in well-known forms of architectural competitions. By enabling feedback on preliminary design ideas and solutions, the dialogues are meant to accelerate processes of clarification and learning, and to enable the contestants to implement changes and improvements during the development of their final design entries. However, in an empirical study the actual effects proved less straight-forward. The feedback allowed the architects to react and adapt, but in some cases they reacted and adapted in ways which they later regretted.

By showing that feedback may also mislead the architectural teams to draw wrong implications we are sensitized to the inherent problems in knowing certain things ahead of time. We elaborate on this dilemma and suggest some implications for the theory and management of architectural competitions.
Original languageEnglish
JournalScandinavian Journal of Management
Volume27
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)160-166
ISSN0956-5221
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Cite this

Kreiner, Kristian ; Jacobsen, Peter Holm ; Jensen, Daniel Toft. / Dialogues and the Problems of Knowing : Reinventing the Architectural Competition. In: Scandinavian Journal of Management. 2011 ; Vol. 27, No. 1. pp. 160-166.
@article{a785347c9ac74d4a894541a42f6bab11,
title = "Dialogues and the Problems of Knowing: Reinventing the Architectural Competition",
abstract = "We describe and analyze the introduction of legitimate dialogues in architectural competitions. What happens to the competition when the contestants are allowed to interact with each other and with the competition jury? We consider dialogues to be a supplementary social technology that is becoming embedded in well-known forms of architectural competitions. By enabling feedback on preliminary design ideas and solutions, the dialogues are meant to accelerate processes of clarification and learning, and to enable the contestants to implement changes and improvements during the development of their final design entries. However, in an empirical study the actual effects proved less straight-forward. The feedback allowed the architects to react and adapt, but in some cases they reacted and adapted in ways which they later regretted.By showing that feedback may also mislead the architectural teams to draw wrong implications we are sensitized to the inherent problems in knowing certain things ahead of time. We elaborate on this dilemma and suggest some implications for the theory and management of architectural competitions.",
keywords = "Dialogue-based architectural competitions, Garbage can process, Gap closing, Knowing ahead of time",
author = "Kristian Kreiner and Jacobsen, {Peter Holm} and Jensen, {Daniel Toft}",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1016/j.scaman.2010.12.003",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "160--166",
journal = "Scandinavian Journal of Management",
issn = "0956-5221",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",
number = "1",

}

Dialogues and the Problems of Knowing : Reinventing the Architectural Competition. / Kreiner, Kristian; Jacobsen, Peter Holm; Jensen, Daniel Toft.

In: Scandinavian Journal of Management, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2011, p. 160-166.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dialogues and the Problems of Knowing

T2 - Reinventing the Architectural Competition

AU - Kreiner, Kristian

AU - Jacobsen, Peter Holm

AU - Jensen, Daniel Toft

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - We describe and analyze the introduction of legitimate dialogues in architectural competitions. What happens to the competition when the contestants are allowed to interact with each other and with the competition jury? We consider dialogues to be a supplementary social technology that is becoming embedded in well-known forms of architectural competitions. By enabling feedback on preliminary design ideas and solutions, the dialogues are meant to accelerate processes of clarification and learning, and to enable the contestants to implement changes and improvements during the development of their final design entries. However, in an empirical study the actual effects proved less straight-forward. The feedback allowed the architects to react and adapt, but in some cases they reacted and adapted in ways which they later regretted.By showing that feedback may also mislead the architectural teams to draw wrong implications we are sensitized to the inherent problems in knowing certain things ahead of time. We elaborate on this dilemma and suggest some implications for the theory and management of architectural competitions.

AB - We describe and analyze the introduction of legitimate dialogues in architectural competitions. What happens to the competition when the contestants are allowed to interact with each other and with the competition jury? We consider dialogues to be a supplementary social technology that is becoming embedded in well-known forms of architectural competitions. By enabling feedback on preliminary design ideas and solutions, the dialogues are meant to accelerate processes of clarification and learning, and to enable the contestants to implement changes and improvements during the development of their final design entries. However, in an empirical study the actual effects proved less straight-forward. The feedback allowed the architects to react and adapt, but in some cases they reacted and adapted in ways which they later regretted.By showing that feedback may also mislead the architectural teams to draw wrong implications we are sensitized to the inherent problems in knowing certain things ahead of time. We elaborate on this dilemma and suggest some implications for the theory and management of architectural competitions.

KW - Dialogue-based architectural competitions

KW - Garbage can process

KW - Gap closing

KW - Knowing ahead of time

U2 - 10.1016/j.scaman.2010.12.003

DO - 10.1016/j.scaman.2010.12.003

M3 - Journal article

VL - 27

SP - 160

EP - 166

JO - Scandinavian Journal of Management

JF - Scandinavian Journal of Management

SN - 0956-5221

IS - 1

ER -