TY - JOUR
T1 - Delays in Medical Malpractice Litigation in Civil Law Jurisdictions
T2 - Some Evidence from the Italian Court of Cassation
AU - Grembi, Veronica
AU - Garoupaa, Nuno
PY - 2013/10
Y1 - 2013/10
N2 - Medical malpractice law and tort reform are contentious issues. In this paper, we focus on Italy as an example of a civil law jurisdiction. Italian medical malpractice law is essentially judge-made law. However, its effectiveness is likely to be curtailed by excessive delays in litigation. Several reforms have been enacted since the late 1980s to correct this situation. By making use of the decisions of the Italian Court of Cassation (which have shaped medical malpractice law) from 1970 to 2009, we show that these reforms had no general statistically significant impact on delays. Recent reduction of delays does not seem to be related to legal reforms but rather explained by other factors.
AB - Medical malpractice law and tort reform are contentious issues. In this paper, we focus on Italy as an example of a civil law jurisdiction. Italian medical malpractice law is essentially judge-made law. However, its effectiveness is likely to be curtailed by excessive delays in litigation. Several reforms have been enacted since the late 1980s to correct this situation. By making use of the decisions of the Italian Court of Cassation (which have shaped medical malpractice law) from 1970 to 2009, we show that these reforms had no general statistically significant impact on delays. Recent reduction of delays does not seem to be related to legal reforms but rather explained by other factors.
U2 - 10.1017/S1744133112000436
DO - 10.1017/S1744133112000436
M3 - Journal article
SN - 1744-1331
VL - 8
SP - 423
EP - 452
JO - Health Economics, Policy and Law
JF - Health Economics, Policy and Law
IS - 4
ER -