Definitions, Interactions and Beyond: Response to Carlson, Galambos, Musselin and Wright

Gabriel Galvez-Behar, Anna Guagnini, Joris Mercelis, R. Daniel Wadhwani

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Responding to the commentators on the two special issues (in Management and Organizational History and in History and Technology) devoted to academic entrepreneurship in historical perspective, we renew our invitation to adopt a broad definition of the term entrepreneurship, and elaborate on our view that it can be a heuristically valid tool in the analysis of historical change in the academic, political, and social worlds. We agree, in particular, that more research needs to be carried out on the relationships between the institutional and commercial aspects of entrepreneurship in academia, and how the two aspects coalesced into forms of “organized entrepreneurship” at the university level. Particularly promising in this regard would be historical research on the interdependencies between entrepreneurial processes at the individual and organizational levels, the changing roles of administrative officers and governing bodies of institutions of higher education, and shifts in the regulation of academics’ outside activities. Studies of the changing ways that business people and organizations integrate academic knowledge into products and enterprises in collaboration with academic partners would also contribute to this research agenda. For all the obstacles and difficulties arising from differences of interpretation across disciplines, interdisciplinary scholarship between history and the social sciences remains promising as a way to engage in research on the evolution of academic entrepreneurship, as well as an effective way to question the relevance of our concepts in our own disciplines.
Responding to the commentators on the two special issues (in Management and Organizational History and in History and Technology) devoted to academic entrepreneurship in historical perspective, we renew our invitation to adopt a broad definition of the term entrepreneurship, and elaborate on our view that it can be a heuristically valid tool in the analysis of historical change in the academic, political, and social worlds. We agree, in particular, that more research needs to be carried out on the relationships between the institutional and commercial aspects of entrepreneurship in academia, and how the two aspects coalesced into forms of “organized entrepreneurship” at the university level. Particularly promising in this regard would be historical research on the interdependencies between entrepreneurial processes at the individual and organizational levels, the changing roles of administrative officers and governing bodies of institutions of higher education, and shifts in the regulation of academics’ outside activities. Studies of the changing ways that business people and organizations integrate academic knowledge into products and enterprises in collaboration with academic partners would also contribute to this research agenda. For all the obstacles and difficulties arising from differences of interpretation across disciplines, interdisciplinary scholarship between history and the social sciences remains promising as a way to engage in research on the evolution of academic entrepreneurship, as well as an effective way to question the relevance of our concepts in our own disciplines.
LanguageEnglish
JournalManagement & Organizational History
Volume13
Issue number2
Pages106-112
Number of pages7
ISSN1744-9359
DOIs
StatePublished - 2018

Keywords

  • Academic entrepreneurship
  • Institutional change
  • History of science and technology
  • History of higher education

Cite this

Galvez-Behar, Gabriel ; Guagnini, Anna ; Mercelis, Joris ; Wadhwani, R. Daniel. / Definitions, Interactions and Beyond : Response to Carlson, Galambos, Musselin and Wright. In: Management & Organizational History. 2018 ; Vol. 13, No. 2. pp. 106-112
@article{3918d29016eb4beaa4d69c9518fb6c98,
title = "Definitions, Interactions and Beyond: Response to Carlson, Galambos, Musselin and Wright",
abstract = "Responding to the commentators on the two special issues (in Management and Organizational History and in History and Technology) devoted to academic entrepreneurship in historical perspective, we renew our invitation to adopt a broad definition of the term entrepreneurship, and elaborate on our view that it can be a heuristically valid tool in the analysis of historical change in the academic, political, and social worlds. We agree, in particular, that more research needs to be carried out on the relationships between the institutional and commercial aspects of entrepreneurship in academia, and how the two aspects coalesced into forms of “organized entrepreneurship” at the university level. Particularly promising in this regard would be historical research on the interdependencies between entrepreneurial processes at the individual and organizational levels, the changing roles of administrative officers and governing bodies of institutions of higher education, and shifts in the regulation of academics’ outside activities. Studies of the changing ways that business people and organizations integrate academic knowledge into products and enterprises in collaboration with academic partners would also contribute to this research agenda. For all the obstacles and difficulties arising from differences of interpretation across disciplines, interdisciplinary scholarship between history and the social sciences remains promising as a way to engage in research on the evolution of academic entrepreneurship, as well as an effective way to question the relevance of our concepts in our own disciplines.",
keywords = "Academic entrepreneurship, Institutional change, History of science and technology, History of higher education, Academic entrepreneurship, Institutional change, History of science and technology, History of higher education",
author = "Gabriel Galvez-Behar and Anna Guagnini and Joris Mercelis and Wadhwani, {R. Daniel}",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1080/17449359.2018.1530846",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "106--112",
journal = "Management & Organizational History",
issn = "1744-9359",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2",

}

Definitions, Interactions and Beyond : Response to Carlson, Galambos, Musselin and Wright. / Galvez-Behar, Gabriel; Guagnini, Anna; Mercelis, Joris; Wadhwani, R. Daniel.

In: Management & Organizational History, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2018, p. 106-112.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Definitions, Interactions and Beyond

T2 - Management & Organizational History

AU - Galvez-Behar,Gabriel

AU - Guagnini,Anna

AU - Mercelis,Joris

AU - Wadhwani,R. Daniel

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Responding to the commentators on the two special issues (in Management and Organizational History and in History and Technology) devoted to academic entrepreneurship in historical perspective, we renew our invitation to adopt a broad definition of the term entrepreneurship, and elaborate on our view that it can be a heuristically valid tool in the analysis of historical change in the academic, political, and social worlds. We agree, in particular, that more research needs to be carried out on the relationships between the institutional and commercial aspects of entrepreneurship in academia, and how the two aspects coalesced into forms of “organized entrepreneurship” at the university level. Particularly promising in this regard would be historical research on the interdependencies between entrepreneurial processes at the individual and organizational levels, the changing roles of administrative officers and governing bodies of institutions of higher education, and shifts in the regulation of academics’ outside activities. Studies of the changing ways that business people and organizations integrate academic knowledge into products and enterprises in collaboration with academic partners would also contribute to this research agenda. For all the obstacles and difficulties arising from differences of interpretation across disciplines, interdisciplinary scholarship between history and the social sciences remains promising as a way to engage in research on the evolution of academic entrepreneurship, as well as an effective way to question the relevance of our concepts in our own disciplines.

AB - Responding to the commentators on the two special issues (in Management and Organizational History and in History and Technology) devoted to academic entrepreneurship in historical perspective, we renew our invitation to adopt a broad definition of the term entrepreneurship, and elaborate on our view that it can be a heuristically valid tool in the analysis of historical change in the academic, political, and social worlds. We agree, in particular, that more research needs to be carried out on the relationships between the institutional and commercial aspects of entrepreneurship in academia, and how the two aspects coalesced into forms of “organized entrepreneurship” at the university level. Particularly promising in this regard would be historical research on the interdependencies between entrepreneurial processes at the individual and organizational levels, the changing roles of administrative officers and governing bodies of institutions of higher education, and shifts in the regulation of academics’ outside activities. Studies of the changing ways that business people and organizations integrate academic knowledge into products and enterprises in collaboration with academic partners would also contribute to this research agenda. For all the obstacles and difficulties arising from differences of interpretation across disciplines, interdisciplinary scholarship between history and the social sciences remains promising as a way to engage in research on the evolution of academic entrepreneurship, as well as an effective way to question the relevance of our concepts in our own disciplines.

KW - Academic entrepreneurship

KW - Institutional change

KW - History of science and technology

KW - History of higher education

KW - Academic entrepreneurship

KW - Institutional change

KW - History of science and technology

KW - History of higher education

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=1000000000033990&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1080/17449359.2018.1530846

DO - 10.1080/17449359.2018.1530846

M3 - Journal article

VL - 13

SP - 106

EP - 112

JO - Management & Organizational History

JF - Management & Organizational History

SN - 1744-9359

IS - 2

ER -