Decoupling Responsible Management Education

Why Business Schools May Not Walk Their Talk

Andreas Rasche, Dirk Ulrich Gilbert

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    This article examines under what conditions business schools may decouple the structural effects of their engagement in responsible management education from actual organizational practices. We argue that schools may be unable to match rising institutional pressures to publicly commit to responsible management education with their limited internal capacity for change. Our analysis proposes that decoupling is likely if schools (a) are exposed to resource stringency, (b) face overt or covert resistance against change processes, (c) are confronted with competing institutional pressures, and (d) perceive institutional demands as ambiguous. We discuss two implications of this proposition. On one hand, decoupling can cause dissonant legitimacy perceptions, leading to cynicism around responsible management education within business schools. On the other hand, a temporary inconsistency between talk and action may help schools to articulate future ambitions for responsible management education, which, over time, could inspire recoupling effects.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalJournal of Management Inquiry
    Volume24
    Issue number3
    Pages (from-to)239-252
    Number of pages14
    ISSN1056-4926
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Cite this

    @article{3eca987c84ab497f959b83b907d7089e,
    title = "Decoupling Responsible Management Education: Why Business Schools May Not Walk Their Talk",
    abstract = "This article examines under what conditions business schools may decouple the structural effects of their engagement in responsible management education from actual organizational practices. We argue that schools may be unable to match rising institutional pressures to publicly commit to responsible management education with their limited internal capacity for change. Our analysis proposes that decoupling is likely if schools (a) are exposed to resource stringency, (b) face overt or covert resistance against change processes, (c) are confronted with competing institutional pressures, and (d) perceive institutional demands as ambiguous. We discuss two implications of this proposition. On one hand, decoupling can cause dissonant legitimacy perceptions, leading to cynicism around responsible management education within business schools. On the other hand, a temporary inconsistency between talk and action may help schools to articulate future ambitions for responsible management education, which, over time, could inspire recoupling effects.",
    keywords = "Corporate social responsibility, Decoupling, Principles for Responsible Management Edcuation (PRME), Responsible management education",
    author = "Andreas Rasche and Gilbert, {Dirk Ulrich}",
    year = "2015",
    doi = "10.1177/1056492614567315",
    language = "English",
    volume = "24",
    pages = "239--252",
    journal = "Journal of Management Inquiry",
    issn = "1056-4926",
    publisher = "Sage Publications, Inc.",
    number = "3",

    }

    Decoupling Responsible Management Education : Why Business Schools May Not Walk Their Talk . / Rasche, Andreas; Gilbert, Dirk Ulrich.

    In: Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2015, p. 239-252.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Decoupling Responsible Management Education

    T2 - Why Business Schools May Not Walk Their Talk

    AU - Rasche, Andreas

    AU - Gilbert, Dirk Ulrich

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - This article examines under what conditions business schools may decouple the structural effects of their engagement in responsible management education from actual organizational practices. We argue that schools may be unable to match rising institutional pressures to publicly commit to responsible management education with their limited internal capacity for change. Our analysis proposes that decoupling is likely if schools (a) are exposed to resource stringency, (b) face overt or covert resistance against change processes, (c) are confronted with competing institutional pressures, and (d) perceive institutional demands as ambiguous. We discuss two implications of this proposition. On one hand, decoupling can cause dissonant legitimacy perceptions, leading to cynicism around responsible management education within business schools. On the other hand, a temporary inconsistency between talk and action may help schools to articulate future ambitions for responsible management education, which, over time, could inspire recoupling effects.

    AB - This article examines under what conditions business schools may decouple the structural effects of their engagement in responsible management education from actual organizational practices. We argue that schools may be unable to match rising institutional pressures to publicly commit to responsible management education with their limited internal capacity for change. Our analysis proposes that decoupling is likely if schools (a) are exposed to resource stringency, (b) face overt or covert resistance against change processes, (c) are confronted with competing institutional pressures, and (d) perceive institutional demands as ambiguous. We discuss two implications of this proposition. On one hand, decoupling can cause dissonant legitimacy perceptions, leading to cynicism around responsible management education within business schools. On the other hand, a temporary inconsistency between talk and action may help schools to articulate future ambitions for responsible management education, which, over time, could inspire recoupling effects.

    KW - Corporate social responsibility

    KW - Decoupling

    KW - Principles for Responsible Management Edcuation (PRME)

    KW - Responsible management education

    UR - http://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954921420528&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

    U2 - 10.1177/1056492614567315

    DO - 10.1177/1056492614567315

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 24

    SP - 239

    EP - 252

    JO - Journal of Management Inquiry

    JF - Journal of Management Inquiry

    SN - 1056-4926

    IS - 3

    ER -