Abstract
Recently, a number of positions with corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the position title have been introduced to the top management teams (TMTs) of some of the world’s largest corporations. I explore this phenomenon. I revisit 10 such positions identified in a previous study to add a longitudinal aspect. I then focus on three case companies from within this selection- H&M, Mattel, and Storebrand- whereby I employ the Weberian distinction between formal and substantive rationality to identify the rationales expressed by members of these TMTs for including a CSR position to the TMT. This Weberian distinction serves as a useful
means through which to identify and describe tensions that become apparent when the CSR agenda is considered. Additionally, I show the CSR TMT position may indicate the establishment of a “CSR bureaucracy” within these case companies where the CSR TMT position represents the “office holder” at the top of the corporation’s CSR bureaucracy.
means through which to identify and describe tensions that become apparent when the CSR agenda is considered. Additionally, I show the CSR TMT position may indicate the establishment of a “CSR bureaucracy” within these case companies where the CSR TMT position represents the “office holder” at the top of the corporation’s CSR bureaucracy.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Publication date | 2012 |
Publication status | Published - 2012 |
Event | The 19th Annual International Conference Promoting Business Ethics - The Embassy Suites Hotel, Buffalo, United States Duration: 24 Oct 2012 → 26 Oct 2012 Conference number: 19 http://apps.niagara.edu/ethics/ |
Conference
Conference | The 19th Annual International Conference Promoting Business Ethics |
---|---|
Number | 19 |
Location | The Embassy Suites Hotel |
Country/Territory | United States |
City | Buffalo |
Period | 24/10/2012 → 26/10/2012 |
Internet address |