Crowdwork Platforms

Juxtaposing Centralized and Decentralized Governance

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Crowdwork is a novel form of digitally mediated work arrangement that is managed and organized through online labor platforms. This paper focuses on the governance of platforms that facilitate creative work—that is, complex work tasks that require high-level skill and creative workers. Crowdwork platform governance faces numerous challenges as a result of technology mediation, scalable and distributed workers, and temporary work arrangements. Creative crowdwork platforms, such as Topcoder, typically require additional governance structures to manage complex tasks. However, we know relatively little about creative crowdwork platform governance, as most existing studies focus on routine work platforms, such as Amazon Mechanical Turk. Accordingly, this paper explores how incumbent and insurgent creative crowdwork platforms are governed under centralized and decentralized modes. We conducted a comparative case study based on the analysis of two different cases: Topcoder, a successful commercial platform with a largely centralized governance structure, and CanYa, an emerging innovative platform based on blockchain technology with more decentralized governance. We identified and classified different governance elements related to work control and work coordination. In addition, we explored the characteristics of creative crowdwork platform governance with different degrees of centralization.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationECIS 2019 Proceedings
Number of pages16
Place of PublicationAtlanta, GA
PublisherAssociation for Information Systems. AIS Electronic Library (AISeL)
Publication date2019
ISBN (Print)9781733632508
Publication statusPublished - 2019
EventThe 27th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS) 2019: Information Systems for a Sharing Society - Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Duration: 8 Jun 201914 Jun 2019
Conference number: 27
http://ecis2019.eu/

Conference

ConferenceThe 27th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS) 2019
Number27
LocationStockholm University
CountrySweden
CityStockholm
Period08/06/201914/06/2019
Internet address
SeriesProceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems
ISSN0000-0034

Keywords

  • Crowdwork governance
  • Creative crowdwork
  • Centralized platforms
  • Decentralized platforms
  • Blockchain
  • Tokenomics

Cite this

Gol, E. S., Avital, M., & Stein, M-K. (2019). Crowdwork Platforms: Juxtaposing Centralized and Decentralized Governance. In ECIS 2019 Proceedings Atlanta, GA: Association for Information Systems. AIS Electronic Library (AISeL). Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems
Gol, Elham Shafiei ; Avital, Michel ; Stein, Mari-Klara. / Crowdwork Platforms : Juxtaposing Centralized and Decentralized Governance. ECIS 2019 Proceedings. Atlanta, GA : Association for Information Systems. AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 2019. (Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems).
@inproceedings{d6d3ded2557d44149141b57c42ee9fb2,
title = "Crowdwork Platforms: Juxtaposing Centralized and Decentralized Governance",
abstract = "Crowdwork is a novel form of digitally mediated work arrangement that is managed and organized through online labor platforms. This paper focuses on the governance of platforms that facilitate creative work—that is, complex work tasks that require high-level skill and creative workers. Crowdwork platform governance faces numerous challenges as a result of technology mediation, scalable and distributed workers, and temporary work arrangements. Creative crowdwork platforms, such as Topcoder, typically require additional governance structures to manage complex tasks. However, we know relatively little about creative crowdwork platform governance, as most existing studies focus on routine work platforms, such as Amazon Mechanical Turk. Accordingly, this paper explores how incumbent and insurgent creative crowdwork platforms are governed under centralized and decentralized modes. We conducted a comparative case study based on the analysis of two different cases: Topcoder, a successful commercial platform with a largely centralized governance structure, and CanYa, an emerging innovative platform based on blockchain technology with more decentralized governance. We identified and classified different governance elements related to work control and work coordination. In addition, we explored the characteristics of creative crowdwork platform governance with different degrees of centralization.",
keywords = "Crowdwork governance, Creative crowdwork, Centralized platforms, Decentralized platforms, Blockchain, Tokenomics, Crowdwork governance, Creative crowdwork, Centralized platforms, Decentralized platforms, Blockchain, Tokenomics",
author = "Gol, {Elham Shafiei} and Michel Avital and Mari-Klara Stein",
year = "2019",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781733632508",
booktitle = "ECIS 2019 Proceedings",
publisher = "Association for Information Systems. AIS Electronic Library (AISeL)",

}

Gol, ES, Avital, M & Stein, M-K 2019, Crowdwork Platforms: Juxtaposing Centralized and Decentralized Governance. in ECIS 2019 Proceedings. Association for Information Systems. AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), Atlanta, GA, Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems, Stockholm, Sweden, 08/06/2019.

Crowdwork Platforms : Juxtaposing Centralized and Decentralized Governance. / Gol, Elham Shafiei; Avital, Michel; Stein, Mari-Klara.

ECIS 2019 Proceedings. Atlanta, GA : Association for Information Systems. AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 2019. (Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Crowdwork Platforms

T2 - Juxtaposing Centralized and Decentralized Governance

AU - Gol, Elham Shafiei

AU - Avital, Michel

AU - Stein, Mari-Klara

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Crowdwork is a novel form of digitally mediated work arrangement that is managed and organized through online labor platforms. This paper focuses on the governance of platforms that facilitate creative work—that is, complex work tasks that require high-level skill and creative workers. Crowdwork platform governance faces numerous challenges as a result of technology mediation, scalable and distributed workers, and temporary work arrangements. Creative crowdwork platforms, such as Topcoder, typically require additional governance structures to manage complex tasks. However, we know relatively little about creative crowdwork platform governance, as most existing studies focus on routine work platforms, such as Amazon Mechanical Turk. Accordingly, this paper explores how incumbent and insurgent creative crowdwork platforms are governed under centralized and decentralized modes. We conducted a comparative case study based on the analysis of two different cases: Topcoder, a successful commercial platform with a largely centralized governance structure, and CanYa, an emerging innovative platform based on blockchain technology with more decentralized governance. We identified and classified different governance elements related to work control and work coordination. In addition, we explored the characteristics of creative crowdwork platform governance with different degrees of centralization.

AB - Crowdwork is a novel form of digitally mediated work arrangement that is managed and organized through online labor platforms. This paper focuses on the governance of platforms that facilitate creative work—that is, complex work tasks that require high-level skill and creative workers. Crowdwork platform governance faces numerous challenges as a result of technology mediation, scalable and distributed workers, and temporary work arrangements. Creative crowdwork platforms, such as Topcoder, typically require additional governance structures to manage complex tasks. However, we know relatively little about creative crowdwork platform governance, as most existing studies focus on routine work platforms, such as Amazon Mechanical Turk. Accordingly, this paper explores how incumbent and insurgent creative crowdwork platforms are governed under centralized and decentralized modes. We conducted a comparative case study based on the analysis of two different cases: Topcoder, a successful commercial platform with a largely centralized governance structure, and CanYa, an emerging innovative platform based on blockchain technology with more decentralized governance. We identified and classified different governance elements related to work control and work coordination. In addition, we explored the characteristics of creative crowdwork platform governance with different degrees of centralization.

KW - Crowdwork governance

KW - Creative crowdwork

KW - Centralized platforms

KW - Decentralized platforms

KW - Blockchain

KW - Tokenomics

KW - Crowdwork governance

KW - Creative crowdwork

KW - Centralized platforms

KW - Decentralized platforms

KW - Blockchain

KW - Tokenomics

M3 - Article in proceedings

SN - 9781733632508

BT - ECIS 2019 Proceedings

PB - Association for Information Systems. AIS Electronic Library (AISeL)

CY - Atlanta, GA

ER -

Gol ES, Avital M, Stein M-K. Crowdwork Platforms: Juxtaposing Centralized and Decentralized Governance. In ECIS 2019 Proceedings. Atlanta, GA: Association for Information Systems. AIS Electronic Library (AISeL). 2019. (Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems).