Critical and Mainstream International Business Research: Making Critical IB an Integral Part of a Societally Engaged International Business Discipline

Christoph Dörrenbächer, Jens Gammelgaard

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aims to address the relationship between critical and mainstream international business (IB) research and discuss the ways forward for the former. Design/methodology/approach: The paper empirically maps critical IB scholarship by analysing more than 250 academic articles published in critical perspectives on international business (cpoib) from 2005 to 2017. The paper also includes a citation analysis that uncovers how critical IB research is recognized and discussed in mainstream IB studies. Findings: The extant critical IB research can be broken into five main topical clusters: positioning critical IB research, postcolonial IB studies, effects of international business activities, financialization and the global financial crisis and “Black IB” and corporate social responsibility. The citation analysis demonstrates that critical IB research is rarely recognized in mainstream IB academic outlets. Originality/value: This paper is the first to empirically map critical IB research and to measure its impact on mainstream IB research. Based on these insights, as well as discussions of the more critical voices within mainstream IB studies and the debate over critical performativity in critical management studies, ways of developing critical IB research are examined.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCritical Perspectives on International Business
Volume15
Issue number2/3
Pages (from-to)239-261
Number of pages23
ISSN1742-2043
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • Multinational corporation
  • International business
  • Citation analysis
  • Critical management studies
  • Critical performativity
  • Future of international business

Cite this