Creative Analogy Use in a Heterogeneous Design Team: The Pervasive Role of Background Domain Knowledge

Bo Christensen, Linden J. Ball

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

We integrated two research traditions – one focusing on analogical reasoning, the other on knowledge sharing – with the aim of examining how designers' unique knowledge backgrounds can fuel analogy-based creativity. The present dataset afforded a unique opportunity to pursue this aim since the design dialogue derived from team members with highly disparate educational backgrounds. Our analyses revealed that analogies that matched (versus mismatched) educational backgrounds were generated and revisited more frequently, presumably because they were more accessible. Matching analogies were also associated with increased epistemic uncertainty, perhaps because domain experts appreciate the challenge of mapping such analogies between domains. Our findings support claims from the knowledge-sharing literature for a direct route from knowledge diversity through analogical reasoning to novel idea production.
Original languageEnglish
JournalDesign Studies
Volume46
Pages (from-to)38-58
Number of pages21
ISSN0142-694X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2016

Keywords

  • Design cognition
  • Analogical reasoning
  • Creative design
  • Collaborative design
  • Conceptual design

Cite this

@article{748fed8a848f460a97b6d3ead1da0c45,
title = "Creative Analogy Use in a Heterogeneous Design Team: The Pervasive Role of Background Domain Knowledge",
abstract = "We integrated two research traditions – one focusing on analogical reasoning, the other on knowledge sharing – with the aim of examining how designers' unique knowledge backgrounds can fuel analogy-based creativity. The present dataset afforded a unique opportunity to pursue this aim since the design dialogue derived from team members with highly disparate educational backgrounds. Our analyses revealed that analogies that matched (versus mismatched) educational backgrounds were generated and revisited more frequently, presumably because they were more accessible. Matching analogies were also associated with increased epistemic uncertainty, perhaps because domain experts appreciate the challenge of mapping such analogies between domains. Our findings support claims from the knowledge-sharing literature for a direct route from knowledge diversity through analogical reasoning to novel idea production.",
keywords = "Design cognition, Analogical reasoning, Creative design, Collaborative design, Conceptual design, Design cognition, Analogical reasoning, Creative design, Collaborative design, Conceptual design",
author = "Bo Christensen and Ball, {Linden J.}",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.destud.2016.07.004",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "38--58",
journal = "Design Studies",
issn = "0142-694X",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",

}

Creative Analogy Use in a Heterogeneous Design Team : The Pervasive Role of Background Domain Knowledge. / Christensen, Bo; Ball, Linden J.

In: Design Studies, Vol. 46, 09.2016, p. 38-58.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Creative Analogy Use in a Heterogeneous Design Team

T2 - The Pervasive Role of Background Domain Knowledge

AU - Christensen, Bo

AU - Ball, Linden J.

PY - 2016/9

Y1 - 2016/9

N2 - We integrated two research traditions – one focusing on analogical reasoning, the other on knowledge sharing – with the aim of examining how designers' unique knowledge backgrounds can fuel analogy-based creativity. The present dataset afforded a unique opportunity to pursue this aim since the design dialogue derived from team members with highly disparate educational backgrounds. Our analyses revealed that analogies that matched (versus mismatched) educational backgrounds were generated and revisited more frequently, presumably because they were more accessible. Matching analogies were also associated with increased epistemic uncertainty, perhaps because domain experts appreciate the challenge of mapping such analogies between domains. Our findings support claims from the knowledge-sharing literature for a direct route from knowledge diversity through analogical reasoning to novel idea production.

AB - We integrated two research traditions – one focusing on analogical reasoning, the other on knowledge sharing – with the aim of examining how designers' unique knowledge backgrounds can fuel analogy-based creativity. The present dataset afforded a unique opportunity to pursue this aim since the design dialogue derived from team members with highly disparate educational backgrounds. Our analyses revealed that analogies that matched (versus mismatched) educational backgrounds were generated and revisited more frequently, presumably because they were more accessible. Matching analogies were also associated with increased epistemic uncertainty, perhaps because domain experts appreciate the challenge of mapping such analogies between domains. Our findings support claims from the knowledge-sharing literature for a direct route from knowledge diversity through analogical reasoning to novel idea production.

KW - Design cognition

KW - Analogical reasoning

KW - Creative design

KW - Collaborative design

KW - Conceptual design

KW - Design cognition

KW - Analogical reasoning

KW - Creative design

KW - Collaborative design

KW - Conceptual design

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954926228400

U2 - 10.1016/j.destud.2016.07.004

DO - 10.1016/j.destud.2016.07.004

M3 - Journal article

VL - 46

SP - 38

EP - 58

JO - Design Studies

JF - Design Studies

SN - 0142-694X

ER -