TY - CHAP
T1 - Coxswaining the Practitioner’s Research Agenda
T2 - How B2B Marketing Academics Can Really Transform Business and Society
AU - Van der Borgh, Michel
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Many scholars and practitioners question whether business to business (B2B) marketing scholars can really address practitioner challenges and thus have societal value. Digitalization, artificial intelligence, and big data disrupt the B2B work environment in unprecedented ways. Indeed, practitioners operate in increasingly complex, dynamic, and ambiguous settings where answers are needed swiftly and expediently. This need stands in sharp contrast to the work conventions of marketing scholars who generally spend many years on a research project before it lands in a top-tier academic journal. The obvious issue here is that marketing scholars produce insights for a ship that has already sailed. Scholars have ingeniously solved the issue for themselves by focusing on generalizable mechanisms, theories, and solutions, however, this approach suffers from producing less practical guidelines. Consequently, practitioners tend to rely more on gut-feeling, ad hoc research and highly-paid consultants (and less on academics), which produces fast but less rigorous results. The question is whether marketing scholars can execute relevant and interesting research, in a fast and rigorous manner. Ideally, as I will explain in this chapter, marketing scholars need to abandon the reactive scholarly research approach and instead take the driver’s seat in transforming business and society, which is the research agenda that I propose.
AB - Many scholars and practitioners question whether business to business (B2B) marketing scholars can really address practitioner challenges and thus have societal value. Digitalization, artificial intelligence, and big data disrupt the B2B work environment in unprecedented ways. Indeed, practitioners operate in increasingly complex, dynamic, and ambiguous settings where answers are needed swiftly and expediently. This need stands in sharp contrast to the work conventions of marketing scholars who generally spend many years on a research project before it lands in a top-tier academic journal. The obvious issue here is that marketing scholars produce insights for a ship that has already sailed. Scholars have ingeniously solved the issue for themselves by focusing on generalizable mechanisms, theories, and solutions, however, this approach suffers from producing less practical guidelines. Consequently, practitioners tend to rely more on gut-feeling, ad hoc research and highly-paid consultants (and less on academics), which produces fast but less rigorous results. The question is whether marketing scholars can execute relevant and interesting research, in a fast and rigorous manner. Ideally, as I will explain in this chapter, marketing scholars need to abandon the reactive scholarly research approach and instead take the driver’s seat in transforming business and society, which is the research agenda that I propose.
KW - B2B marketing
KW - Academic-practitioner gap
KW - Design science
KW - Framing
KW - B2B marketing
KW - Academic-practitioner gap
KW - Design science
KW - Framing
U2 - 10.4337/9781800888531.00013
DO - 10.4337/9781800888531.00013
M3 - Book chapter
SN - 9781800888524
T3 - How To Guides
SP - 78
EP - 94
BT - How to Achieve Societal Impact Through Engaged and Collaborative Scholarship
A2 - van der Borgh, Michel
A2 - Lindgreen, Adam
A2 - Schäfers, Tobias
PB - Edward Elgar Publishing
CY - Cheltenham
ER -