Corporate Strategies and Global Competition

Odense Steel Shipyard, 1918–2012

René Taudal Poulsen, Kristoffer Jensen, René Schrøder Christensen, Liping Jiang

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

18 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article analyzes the competitive strategies of Odense Steel Shipyard between 1918 and 2012 and challenges existing scholarship on competition in global industries. Until the 1980s, the yard adopted typical strategies in shipbuilding, starting with cost leadership and subsequently adopting global segmentation and differentiation strategies. From the mid-1980s, however, it successfully followed a unique national responsiveness strategy, which scholars including Dong Sung Cho and Michael E. Porter had ruled out in shipbuilding. The article shows how shipyard owners shaped strategies and influenced competitiveness.
Original languageEnglish
JournalBusiness History Review
Volume91
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)707-734
Number of pages28
ISSN0007-6805
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2017

Keywords

  • Competitiveness
  • Conglomerates
  • Corporate strategy
  • Global competition
  • Shipbuilding

Cite this

Poulsen, René Taudal ; Jensen, Kristoffer ; Christensen, René Schrøder ; Jiang, Liping. / Corporate Strategies and Global Competition : Odense Steel Shipyard, 1918–2012. In: Business History Review. 2017 ; Vol. 91, No. 4. pp. 707-734.
@article{dfff5be900a349dd9e2b8b5a241bb493,
title = "Corporate Strategies and Global Competition: Odense Steel Shipyard, 1918–2012",
abstract = "This article analyzes the competitive strategies of Odense Steel Shipyard between 1918 and 2012 and challenges existing scholarship on competition in global industries. Until the 1980s, the yard adopted typical strategies in shipbuilding, starting with cost leadership and subsequently adopting global segmentation and differentiation strategies. From the mid-1980s, however, it successfully followed a unique national responsiveness strategy, which scholars including Dong Sung Cho and Michael E. Porter had ruled out in shipbuilding. The article shows how shipyard owners shaped strategies and influenced competitiveness.",
keywords = "Competitiveness, Conglomerates, Corporate strategy, Global competition, Shipbuilding, Competitiveness, Conglomerates, Corporate strategy, Global competition, Shipbuilding",
author = "Poulsen, {Ren{\'e} Taudal} and Kristoffer Jensen and Christensen, {Ren{\'e} Schr{\o}der} and Liping Jiang",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S0007680517001386",
language = "English",
volume = "91",
pages = "707--734",
journal = "Business History Review",
issn = "0007-6805",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

Corporate Strategies and Global Competition : Odense Steel Shipyard, 1918–2012. / Poulsen, René Taudal ; Jensen, Kristoffer; Christensen, René Schrøder; Jiang, Liping.

In: Business History Review, Vol. 91, No. 4, 01.2017, p. 707-734.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Corporate Strategies and Global Competition

T2 - Odense Steel Shipyard, 1918–2012

AU - Poulsen, René Taudal

AU - Jensen, Kristoffer

AU - Christensen, René Schrøder

AU - Jiang, Liping

PY - 2017/1

Y1 - 2017/1

N2 - This article analyzes the competitive strategies of Odense Steel Shipyard between 1918 and 2012 and challenges existing scholarship on competition in global industries. Until the 1980s, the yard adopted typical strategies in shipbuilding, starting with cost leadership and subsequently adopting global segmentation and differentiation strategies. From the mid-1980s, however, it successfully followed a unique national responsiveness strategy, which scholars including Dong Sung Cho and Michael E. Porter had ruled out in shipbuilding. The article shows how shipyard owners shaped strategies and influenced competitiveness.

AB - This article analyzes the competitive strategies of Odense Steel Shipyard between 1918 and 2012 and challenges existing scholarship on competition in global industries. Until the 1980s, the yard adopted typical strategies in shipbuilding, starting with cost leadership and subsequently adopting global segmentation and differentiation strategies. From the mid-1980s, however, it successfully followed a unique national responsiveness strategy, which scholars including Dong Sung Cho and Michael E. Porter had ruled out in shipbuilding. The article shows how shipyard owners shaped strategies and influenced competitiveness.

KW - Competitiveness

KW - Conglomerates

KW - Corporate strategy

KW - Global competition

KW - Shipbuilding

KW - Competitiveness

KW - Conglomerates

KW - Corporate strategy

KW - Global competition

KW - Shipbuilding

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954921337081&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1017/S0007680517001386

DO - 10.1017/S0007680517001386

M3 - Journal article

VL - 91

SP - 707

EP - 734

JO - Business History Review

JF - Business History Review

SN - 0007-6805

IS - 4

ER -