Corporate Responses to Stakeholder Activism: Partnerships and Surveillance

Julie Uldam, Hans Krause Hansen

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

64 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: Corporations are increasingly expected to act responsibly. The purpose of this paper is to examine two types of corporate responses to these expectations: overt and covert responses. Specifically, it examines oil companies’ involvement in multi-stakeholder initiatives and sponsorships (overt responses) and their monitoring of critics, including non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and activist organisations (covert responses).
Design/methodology/approach: Theoretically, the paper draws on theories of visibility and post-political regulation. Empirically, it focuses on case studies of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI), Shell and BP, drawing on qualitative methods.
Findings: The paper demonstrates that overt responses create an impression of consensus between antagonistic interests and that covert responses support this impression by containing deep-seated conflicts.
Research limitations/implications: Corporate responses have implications for the role of the corporation as a (post-)political actor. By containing antagonism and creating an impression of consensus, the interplay between overt and covert responses open up further possibilities for the proliferation of soft governance and self-regulation through participation in voluntary transparency and corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities. Data on covert practices of corporations are difficult to access. This impedes possibilities for fully assessing their extent. The findings of this paper support trends emerging from recent research on covert corporate intelligence practices, but more research is needed to provide a systematic overview.
Originality/value: The paper contributes to the understudied area of covert corporate activity in research on the political role of multinational corporations.
Original languageEnglish
JournalCritical Perspectives on International Business
Volume13
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)151-165
Number of pages15
ISSN1742-2043
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • United Kingdom
  • World Wide Web
  • Corporate and social responsibility
  • Corruption
  • Social action

Cite this

@article{0875956b0765438fa21aaf4326c74104,
title = "Corporate Responses to Stakeholder Activism: Partnerships and Surveillance",
abstract = "Purpose: Corporations are increasingly expected to act responsibly. The purpose of this paper is to examine two types of corporate responses to these expectations: overt and covert responses. Specifically, it examines oil companies’ involvement in multi-stakeholder initiatives and sponsorships (overt responses) and their monitoring of critics, including non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and activist organisations (covert responses).Design/methodology/approach: Theoretically, the paper draws on theories of visibility and post-political regulation. Empirically, it focuses on case studies of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI), Shell and BP, drawing on qualitative methods.Findings: The paper demonstrates that overt responses create an impression of consensus between antagonistic interests and that covert responses support this impression by containing deep-seated conflicts.Research limitations/implications: Corporate responses have implications for the role of the corporation as a (post-)political actor. By containing antagonism and creating an impression of consensus, the interplay between overt and covert responses open up further possibilities for the proliferation of soft governance and self-regulation through participation in voluntary transparency and corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities. Data on covert practices of corporations are difficult to access. This impedes possibilities for fully assessing their extent. The findings of this paper support trends emerging from recent research on covert corporate intelligence practices, but more research is needed to provide a systematic overview.Originality/value: The paper contributes to the understudied area of covert corporate activity in research on the political role of multinational corporations.",
keywords = "United Kingdom, World Wide Web, Corporate and social responsibility, Corruption, Social action, United Kingdom, World Wide Web, Corporate and social responsibility, Corruption, Social action",
author = "Julie Uldam and {Krause Hansen}, Hans",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1108/cpoib-07-2015-0029",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "151--165",
journal = "Critical Perspectives on International Business",
issn = "1742-2043",
publisher = "JAI Press",
number = "2",

}

Corporate Responses to Stakeholder Activism : Partnerships and Surveillance. / Uldam, Julie; Krause Hansen, Hans.

In: Critical Perspectives on International Business, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2017, p. 151-165.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Corporate Responses to Stakeholder Activism

T2 - Partnerships and Surveillance

AU - Uldam, Julie

AU - Krause Hansen, Hans

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Purpose: Corporations are increasingly expected to act responsibly. The purpose of this paper is to examine two types of corporate responses to these expectations: overt and covert responses. Specifically, it examines oil companies’ involvement in multi-stakeholder initiatives and sponsorships (overt responses) and their monitoring of critics, including non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and activist organisations (covert responses).Design/methodology/approach: Theoretically, the paper draws on theories of visibility and post-political regulation. Empirically, it focuses on case studies of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI), Shell and BP, drawing on qualitative methods.Findings: The paper demonstrates that overt responses create an impression of consensus between antagonistic interests and that covert responses support this impression by containing deep-seated conflicts.Research limitations/implications: Corporate responses have implications for the role of the corporation as a (post-)political actor. By containing antagonism and creating an impression of consensus, the interplay between overt and covert responses open up further possibilities for the proliferation of soft governance and self-regulation through participation in voluntary transparency and corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities. Data on covert practices of corporations are difficult to access. This impedes possibilities for fully assessing their extent. The findings of this paper support trends emerging from recent research on covert corporate intelligence practices, but more research is needed to provide a systematic overview.Originality/value: The paper contributes to the understudied area of covert corporate activity in research on the political role of multinational corporations.

AB - Purpose: Corporations are increasingly expected to act responsibly. The purpose of this paper is to examine two types of corporate responses to these expectations: overt and covert responses. Specifically, it examines oil companies’ involvement in multi-stakeholder initiatives and sponsorships (overt responses) and their monitoring of critics, including non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and activist organisations (covert responses).Design/methodology/approach: Theoretically, the paper draws on theories of visibility and post-political regulation. Empirically, it focuses on case studies of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI), Shell and BP, drawing on qualitative methods.Findings: The paper demonstrates that overt responses create an impression of consensus between antagonistic interests and that covert responses support this impression by containing deep-seated conflicts.Research limitations/implications: Corporate responses have implications for the role of the corporation as a (post-)political actor. By containing antagonism and creating an impression of consensus, the interplay between overt and covert responses open up further possibilities for the proliferation of soft governance and self-regulation through participation in voluntary transparency and corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities. Data on covert practices of corporations are difficult to access. This impedes possibilities for fully assessing their extent. The findings of this paper support trends emerging from recent research on covert corporate intelligence practices, but more research is needed to provide a systematic overview.Originality/value: The paper contributes to the understudied area of covert corporate activity in research on the political role of multinational corporations.

KW - United Kingdom

KW - World Wide Web

KW - Corporate and social responsibility

KW - Corruption

KW - Social action

KW - United Kingdom

KW - World Wide Web

KW - Corporate and social responsibility

KW - Corruption

KW - Social action

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=1000000000035040

U2 - 10.1108/cpoib-07-2015-0029

DO - 10.1108/cpoib-07-2015-0029

M3 - Journal article

VL - 13

SP - 151

EP - 165

JO - Critical Perspectives on International Business

JF - Critical Perspectives on International Business

SN - 1742-2043

IS - 2

ER -