Corporate Control and Underinvestment

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    This paper reports a study of how the benefits that large shareholders derive from their control of a firm affect the equity issue and investment decisions of the firm. I introduce an explicit agency cost structure based on the benefits of control of the largest shareholder. In a simple extension of the model developed by Myers and Majluf (J Financial Econ 13:187–221, 1984), I show that underinvestment is aggravated when there are benefits of being in control and these benefits are diluted if equity is issued to finance an investment project. Using a large panel of US data, I find that the concerns of large shareholders about the dilution of ownership and control cause firms to issue less equity and to invest less than would otherwise be the case. I also find that it makes no significant difference whether new shares are issued to old shareholders or new shareholders.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalJournal of Management & Governance
    Volume17
    Issue number1
    Pages (from-to)131-155
    Number of pages25
    ISSN1385-3457
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Bibliographical note

    Published online: 13 April 2011

    Cite this

    @article{298d5077853849f4a90d088c2501e9fe,
    title = "Corporate Control and Underinvestment",
    abstract = "This paper reports a study of how the benefits that large shareholders derive from their control of a firm affect the equity issue and investment decisions of the firm. I introduce an explicit agency cost structure based on the benefits of control of the largest shareholder. In a simple extension of the model developed by Myers and Majluf (J Financial Econ 13:187–221, 1984), I show that underinvestment is aggravated when there are benefits of being in control and these benefits are diluted if equity is issued to finance an investment project. Using a large panel of US data, I find that the concerns of large shareholders about the dilution of ownership and control cause firms to issue less equity and to invest less than would otherwise be the case. I also find that it makes no significant difference whether new shares are issued to old shareholders or new shareholders.",
    keywords = "Equity Issue, Underinvestment, Private Benefits of Control , Potential loss of Control, Voting power",
    author = "Thomas Poulsen",
    note = "Published online: 13 April 2011",
    year = "2013",
    doi = "10.1007/s10997-011-9171-8",
    language = "English",
    volume = "17",
    pages = "131--155",
    journal = "Journal of Management & Governance",
    issn = "1385-3457",
    publisher = "Springer",
    number = "1",

    }

    Corporate Control and Underinvestment. / Poulsen, Thomas.

    In: Journal of Management & Governance, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2013, p. 131-155.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Corporate Control and Underinvestment

    AU - Poulsen, Thomas

    N1 - Published online: 13 April 2011

    PY - 2013

    Y1 - 2013

    N2 - This paper reports a study of how the benefits that large shareholders derive from their control of a firm affect the equity issue and investment decisions of the firm. I introduce an explicit agency cost structure based on the benefits of control of the largest shareholder. In a simple extension of the model developed by Myers and Majluf (J Financial Econ 13:187–221, 1984), I show that underinvestment is aggravated when there are benefits of being in control and these benefits are diluted if equity is issued to finance an investment project. Using a large panel of US data, I find that the concerns of large shareholders about the dilution of ownership and control cause firms to issue less equity and to invest less than would otherwise be the case. I also find that it makes no significant difference whether new shares are issued to old shareholders or new shareholders.

    AB - This paper reports a study of how the benefits that large shareholders derive from their control of a firm affect the equity issue and investment decisions of the firm. I introduce an explicit agency cost structure based on the benefits of control of the largest shareholder. In a simple extension of the model developed by Myers and Majluf (J Financial Econ 13:187–221, 1984), I show that underinvestment is aggravated when there are benefits of being in control and these benefits are diluted if equity is issued to finance an investment project. Using a large panel of US data, I find that the concerns of large shareholders about the dilution of ownership and control cause firms to issue less equity and to invest less than would otherwise be the case. I also find that it makes no significant difference whether new shares are issued to old shareholders or new shareholders.

    KW - Equity Issue

    KW - Underinvestment

    KW - Private Benefits of Control

    KW - Potential loss of Control

    KW - Voting power

    UR - http://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954927385359&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

    U2 - 10.1007/s10997-011-9171-8

    DO - 10.1007/s10997-011-9171-8

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 17

    SP - 131

    EP - 155

    JO - Journal of Management & Governance

    JF - Journal of Management & Governance

    SN - 1385-3457

    IS - 1

    ER -