Cooperate or Free Ride?

The Scandinavian Central Banks, Bank for International Settlements and the Austrian Financial Crisis of 1931

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In this article, I discuss the role of the three Scandinavian central banks in the establishment of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) in 1930, and in the international lender of last resort operation towards Austria in 1931. I argue that small central banks were reluctant supporters in the establishment of the BIS and free riders in the Austrian crisis, even though there were marked differences in their attitude to international cooperation. These results run counter to the views of those International Political Economy (IPE) theorists who argue that small states should be in favour of international cooperation. On the other hand, the evidence seems to confirm Kindleberger's hypothesis that small countries were free riding during the international financial crisis of 1931, and that therefore there is a need for some coordinating mechanism, or a hegemon, in such crises.
Original languageEnglish
JournalScandinavian Journal of History
Volume37
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)87-107
ISSN0346-8755
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Cite this

@article{c4d11d799b704d44b440492a760367a4,
title = "Cooperate or Free Ride?: The Scandinavian Central Banks, Bank for International Settlements and the Austrian Financial Crisis of 1931",
abstract = "In this article, I discuss the role of the three Scandinavian central banks in the establishment of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) in 1930, and in the international lender of last resort operation towards Austria in 1931. I argue that small central banks were reluctant supporters in the establishment of the BIS and free riders in the Austrian crisis, even though there were marked differences in their attitude to international cooperation. These results run counter to the views of those International Political Economy (IPE) theorists who argue that small states should be in favour of international cooperation. On the other hand, the evidence seems to confirm Kindleberger's hypothesis that small countries were free riding during the international financial crisis of 1931, and that therefore there is a need for some coordinating mechanism, or a hegemon, in such crises.",
keywords = "central bank cooperation, free riding, small state behaviour, lenders of last resort, international financial crisis, Bank for International Settlements",
author = "Hansen, {Per H.}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1080/03468755.2011.641154",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "87--107",
journal = "Scandinavian Journal of History",
issn = "0346-8755",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Cooperate or Free Ride? The Scandinavian Central Banks, Bank for International Settlements and the Austrian Financial Crisis of 1931. / Hansen, Per H.

In: Scandinavian Journal of History, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2012, p. 87-107.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cooperate or Free Ride?

T2 - The Scandinavian Central Banks, Bank for International Settlements and the Austrian Financial Crisis of 1931

AU - Hansen, Per H.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - In this article, I discuss the role of the three Scandinavian central banks in the establishment of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) in 1930, and in the international lender of last resort operation towards Austria in 1931. I argue that small central banks were reluctant supporters in the establishment of the BIS and free riders in the Austrian crisis, even though there were marked differences in their attitude to international cooperation. These results run counter to the views of those International Political Economy (IPE) theorists who argue that small states should be in favour of international cooperation. On the other hand, the evidence seems to confirm Kindleberger's hypothesis that small countries were free riding during the international financial crisis of 1931, and that therefore there is a need for some coordinating mechanism, or a hegemon, in such crises.

AB - In this article, I discuss the role of the three Scandinavian central banks in the establishment of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) in 1930, and in the international lender of last resort operation towards Austria in 1931. I argue that small central banks were reluctant supporters in the establishment of the BIS and free riders in the Austrian crisis, even though there were marked differences in their attitude to international cooperation. These results run counter to the views of those International Political Economy (IPE) theorists who argue that small states should be in favour of international cooperation. On the other hand, the evidence seems to confirm Kindleberger's hypothesis that small countries were free riding during the international financial crisis of 1931, and that therefore there is a need for some coordinating mechanism, or a hegemon, in such crises.

KW - central bank cooperation

KW - free riding

KW - small state behaviour

KW - lenders of last resort

KW - international financial crisis

KW - Bank for International Settlements

U2 - 10.1080/03468755.2011.641154

DO - 10.1080/03468755.2011.641154

M3 - Journal article

VL - 37

SP - 87

EP - 107

JO - Scandinavian Journal of History

JF - Scandinavian Journal of History

SN - 0346-8755

IS - 1

ER -