Constructing the Value of Information Systems Research

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Building on a social constructivist approach, this commentary examines the value of Information Systems (IS) research and its bearing on the future of the discipline in three steps as follows. First, it is argued that the product of
    IS scholars can serve as a proxy for IS research and that the subject matter of IS research should be examined through the people-information-technology framework. Second, it is argued that value is inherently a situated social
    construction and that ultimately the value of IS research is determined by its particular stakeholders. Third, it is argued that the stakeholders’ appreciation and support can be fostered through grassroots collective action that aims to build a strong brand equity for IS research. In spite of the challenges ahead that stem from the current institutional position of the IS discipline and the prevailing work practices in the academia, the potential of IS scholarship can be realized if the members of the IS community will step forward and reframe the rules of the game.
    Building on a social constructivist approach, this commentary examines the value of Information Systems (IS) research and its bearing on the future of the discipline in three steps as follows. First, it is argued that the product of
    IS scholars can serve as a proxy for IS research and that the subject matter of IS research should be examined through the people-information-technology framework. Second, it is argued that value is inherently a situated social
    construction and that ultimately the value of IS research is determined by its particular stakeholders. Third, it is argued that the stakeholders’ appreciation and support can be fostered through grassroots collective action that aims to build a strong brand equity for IS research. In spite of the challenges ahead that stem from the current institutional position of the IS discipline and the prevailing work practices in the academia, the potential of IS scholarship can be realized if the members of the IS community will step forward and reframe the rules of the game.
    LanguageEnglish
    Article number42
    JournalCommunications of the Association for Information Systems
    Volume34
    Pages817-822
    ISSN1529-3181
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2014

    Keywords

    • IS research domain
    • Research value
    • Future of IS scholarship
    • Collective action

    Cite this

    @article{d50cc68a440d48ffb3f779b64b99a189,
    title = "Constructing the Value of Information Systems Research",
    abstract = "Building on a social constructivist approach, this commentary examines the value of Information Systems (IS) research and its bearing on the future of the discipline in three steps as follows. First, it is argued that the product ofIS scholars can serve as a proxy for IS research and that the subject matter of IS research should be examined through the people-information-technology framework. Second, it is argued that value is inherently a situated socialconstruction and that ultimately the value of IS research is determined by its particular stakeholders. Third, it is argued that the stakeholders’ appreciation and support can be fostered through grassroots collective action that aims to build a strong brand equity for IS research. In spite of the challenges ahead that stem from the current institutional position of the IS discipline and the prevailing work practices in the academia, the potential of IS scholarship can be realized if the members of the IS community will step forward and reframe the rules of the game.",
    keywords = "IS research domain, Research value, Future of IS scholarship, Collective action, IS research domain, Research value, Future of IS scholarship, Collective action",
    author = "Michel Avital",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.17705/1CAIS.03442",
    language = "English",
    volume = "34",
    pages = "817--822",
    journal = "Communications of the Association for Information Systems",
    issn = "1529-3181",
    publisher = "Association for Information Systems",

    }

    Constructing the Value of Information Systems Research. / Avital, Michel.

    In: Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 34, 42, 2014, p. 817-822.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Constructing the Value of Information Systems Research

    AU - Avital,Michel

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - Building on a social constructivist approach, this commentary examines the value of Information Systems (IS) research and its bearing on the future of the discipline in three steps as follows. First, it is argued that the product ofIS scholars can serve as a proxy for IS research and that the subject matter of IS research should be examined through the people-information-technology framework. Second, it is argued that value is inherently a situated socialconstruction and that ultimately the value of IS research is determined by its particular stakeholders. Third, it is argued that the stakeholders’ appreciation and support can be fostered through grassroots collective action that aims to build a strong brand equity for IS research. In spite of the challenges ahead that stem from the current institutional position of the IS discipline and the prevailing work practices in the academia, the potential of IS scholarship can be realized if the members of the IS community will step forward and reframe the rules of the game.

    AB - Building on a social constructivist approach, this commentary examines the value of Information Systems (IS) research and its bearing on the future of the discipline in three steps as follows. First, it is argued that the product ofIS scholars can serve as a proxy for IS research and that the subject matter of IS research should be examined through the people-information-technology framework. Second, it is argued that value is inherently a situated socialconstruction and that ultimately the value of IS research is determined by its particular stakeholders. Third, it is argued that the stakeholders’ appreciation and support can be fostered through grassroots collective action that aims to build a strong brand equity for IS research. In spite of the challenges ahead that stem from the current institutional position of the IS discipline and the prevailing work practices in the academia, the potential of IS scholarship can be realized if the members of the IS community will step forward and reframe the rules of the game.

    KW - IS research domain

    KW - Research value

    KW - Future of IS scholarship

    KW - Collective action

    KW - IS research domain

    KW - Research value

    KW - Future of IS scholarship

    KW - Collective action

    U2 - 10.17705/1CAIS.03442

    DO - 10.17705/1CAIS.03442

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 34

    SP - 817

    EP - 822

    JO - Communications of the Association for Information Systems

    T2 - Communications of the Association for Information Systems

    JF - Communications of the Association for Information Systems

    SN - 1529-3181

    M1 - 42

    ER -