Conceptions of Conflict in Organizational Conflict Research

Toward Critical Reflexivity

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

115 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Diverse and often unacknowledged assumptions underlie organizational conflict research. In this essay, we identify distinct ways of conceptualizing conflict in the theoretical domain of organizational conflict with the aim of setting a new critical agenda for reflexivity in conflict research. In doing so, we first apply a genealogical approach to study conceptions of conflict, and we find that three distinct and essentially contested conceptions frame studies of conflict at work. Second, we employ two empirical examples of conflict to illustrate how organizational conflict research can benefit from a more reflexive approach and advance our understanding of conflict. In this essay, we emphasize how philosophical and political assumptions about conflict frame knowledge production within the field and we encourage future theory development to build on different notions of conflict to become better at coping with the complex and dynamic nature of conflict.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Management Inquiry
Volume28
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)166-179
Number of pages14
ISSN1056-4926
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2019

Bibliographical note

Published online: 29. June 2017

Keywords

  • Organizational conflict
  • Conflict Management
  • Philosophy of science
  • Reflexivity
  • Theorizing

Cite this

@article{dee9613c601d41a286f5364a2fb936b8,
title = "Conceptions of Conflict in Organizational Conflict Research: Toward Critical Reflexivity",
abstract = "Diverse and often unacknowledged assumptions underlie organizational conflict research. In this essay, we identify distinct ways of conceptualizing conflict in the theoretical domain of organizational conflict with the aim of setting a new critical agenda for reflexivity in conflict research. In doing so, we first apply a genealogical approach to study conceptions of conflict, and we find that three distinct and essentially contested conceptions frame studies of conflict at work. Second, we employ two empirical examples of conflict to illustrate how organizational conflict research can benefit from a more reflexive approach and advance our understanding of conflict. In this essay, we emphasize how philosophical and political assumptions about conflict frame knowledge production within the field and we encourage future theory development to build on different notions of conflict to become better at coping with the complex and dynamic nature of conflict.",
keywords = "Organizational conflict, Conflict Management, Philosophy of science, Reflexivity, Theorizing, Organizational conflict, Conflict Management, Philosophy of science, Reflexivity, Theorizing",
author = "Mikkelsen, {Elisabeth Naima} and Stewart Clegg",
note = "Published online: 29. June 2017",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1177/1056492617716774",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "166--179",
journal = "Journal of Management Inquiry",
issn = "1056-4926",
publisher = "Sage Publications, Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Conceptions of Conflict in Organizational Conflict Research : Toward Critical Reflexivity. / Mikkelsen, Elisabeth Naima; Clegg, Stewart.

In: Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol. 28, No. 2, 04.2019, p. 166-179.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conceptions of Conflict in Organizational Conflict Research

T2 - Toward Critical Reflexivity

AU - Mikkelsen, Elisabeth Naima

AU - Clegg, Stewart

N1 - Published online: 29. June 2017

PY - 2019/4

Y1 - 2019/4

N2 - Diverse and often unacknowledged assumptions underlie organizational conflict research. In this essay, we identify distinct ways of conceptualizing conflict in the theoretical domain of organizational conflict with the aim of setting a new critical agenda for reflexivity in conflict research. In doing so, we first apply a genealogical approach to study conceptions of conflict, and we find that three distinct and essentially contested conceptions frame studies of conflict at work. Second, we employ two empirical examples of conflict to illustrate how organizational conflict research can benefit from a more reflexive approach and advance our understanding of conflict. In this essay, we emphasize how philosophical and political assumptions about conflict frame knowledge production within the field and we encourage future theory development to build on different notions of conflict to become better at coping with the complex and dynamic nature of conflict.

AB - Diverse and often unacknowledged assumptions underlie organizational conflict research. In this essay, we identify distinct ways of conceptualizing conflict in the theoretical domain of organizational conflict with the aim of setting a new critical agenda for reflexivity in conflict research. In doing so, we first apply a genealogical approach to study conceptions of conflict, and we find that three distinct and essentially contested conceptions frame studies of conflict at work. Second, we employ two empirical examples of conflict to illustrate how organizational conflict research can benefit from a more reflexive approach and advance our understanding of conflict. In this essay, we emphasize how philosophical and political assumptions about conflict frame knowledge production within the field and we encourage future theory development to build on different notions of conflict to become better at coping with the complex and dynamic nature of conflict.

KW - Organizational conflict

KW - Conflict Management

KW - Philosophy of science

KW - Reflexivity

KW - Theorizing

KW - Organizational conflict

KW - Conflict Management

KW - Philosophy of science

KW - Reflexivity

KW - Theorizing

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954921420528

U2 - 10.1177/1056492617716774

DO - 10.1177/1056492617716774

M3 - Journal article

VL - 28

SP - 166

EP - 179

JO - Journal of Management Inquiry

JF - Journal of Management Inquiry

SN - 1056-4926

IS - 2

ER -