Complementary Theories to Supply Chain Management Revisited

From Borrowing Theories to Theorizing

Arni Halldorsson, Juliana Hsuan, Herbert Kotzab

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose
– The aim of this paper is to identify ways by which the theorizing of supply chain management (SCM) takes place, with particular attention to complementary theories. SCM suffers as well as benefits from a “conceptual slack”.

Design/methodology/approach
– The nature of SCM is discussed, and the role and relevance of theorizing is addressed by using key characteristics of “academic scholarship” based on a literature review of SCM and evaluation of application of theory and theory development.

Findings
– The integrative and multi-layered nature of SCM sets the conditions for “theorizing SCM” that can take place through various forms: theory application, new theoretical combinations and sensitivity to managerial practice. It is pivotal that future research explore further the performative potential of SCM.

Research limitations/implications
– Research with focus on theory development or using complementary theories to advancing understanding of SCM can benefit from the five building blocks of theorizing SCM proposed in the paper.

Practical implications
– Theoretical principles in SCM are not only used to describe practical problems but also to “produce the world”; supply chains can be seen as organizational units that act or consummate an action that delivers a particular performance.

Originality/value
– This paper portrays SCM sensitivity to managerial challenges by moving from borrowing to a more bilateral view on theorizing of SCM, reflecting the nature of SCM.
Original languageEnglish
JournalSupply Chain Management: An International Journal
Volume20
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)574-586
Number of pages13
ISSN1359-8546
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Keywords

  • Research
  • Supply Chain Management
  • Theories

Cite this

@article{58d0eb81354f4a70b28ce238030655bc,
title = "Complementary Theories to Supply Chain Management Revisited: From Borrowing Theories to Theorizing",
abstract = "Purpose– The aim of this paper is to identify ways by which the theorizing of supply chain management (SCM) takes place, with particular attention to complementary theories. SCM suffers as well as benefits from a “conceptual slack”.Design/methodology/approach– The nature of SCM is discussed, and the role and relevance of theorizing is addressed by using key characteristics of “academic scholarship” based on a literature review of SCM and evaluation of application of theory and theory development.Findings– The integrative and multi-layered nature of SCM sets the conditions for “theorizing SCM” that can take place through various forms: theory application, new theoretical combinations and sensitivity to managerial practice. It is pivotal that future research explore further the performative potential of SCM.Research limitations/implications– Research with focus on theory development or using complementary theories to advancing understanding of SCM can benefit from the five building blocks of theorizing SCM proposed in the paper.Practical implications– Theoretical principles in SCM are not only used to describe practical problems but also to “produce the world”; supply chains can be seen as organizational units that act or consummate an action that delivers a particular performance.Originality/value– This paper portrays SCM sensitivity to managerial challenges by moving from borrowing to a more bilateral view on theorizing of SCM, reflecting the nature of SCM.",
keywords = "Research, Supply Chain Management, Theories, Research, Supply Chain Management, Theories",
author = "Arni Halldorsson and Juliana Hsuan and Herbert Kotzab",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1108/SCM-06-2015-0228",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "574--586",
journal = "Supply Chain Management: An International Journal",
issn = "1359-8546",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing",
number = "6",

}

Complementary Theories to Supply Chain Management Revisited : From Borrowing Theories to Theorizing. / Halldorsson, Arni; Hsuan, Juliana; Kotzab, Herbert.

In: Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 20, No. 6, 2015, p. 574-586.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Complementary Theories to Supply Chain Management Revisited

T2 - From Borrowing Theories to Theorizing

AU - Halldorsson, Arni

AU - Hsuan, Juliana

AU - Kotzab, Herbert

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Purpose– The aim of this paper is to identify ways by which the theorizing of supply chain management (SCM) takes place, with particular attention to complementary theories. SCM suffers as well as benefits from a “conceptual slack”.Design/methodology/approach– The nature of SCM is discussed, and the role and relevance of theorizing is addressed by using key characteristics of “academic scholarship” based on a literature review of SCM and evaluation of application of theory and theory development.Findings– The integrative and multi-layered nature of SCM sets the conditions for “theorizing SCM” that can take place through various forms: theory application, new theoretical combinations and sensitivity to managerial practice. It is pivotal that future research explore further the performative potential of SCM.Research limitations/implications– Research with focus on theory development or using complementary theories to advancing understanding of SCM can benefit from the five building blocks of theorizing SCM proposed in the paper.Practical implications– Theoretical principles in SCM are not only used to describe practical problems but also to “produce the world”; supply chains can be seen as organizational units that act or consummate an action that delivers a particular performance.Originality/value– This paper portrays SCM sensitivity to managerial challenges by moving from borrowing to a more bilateral view on theorizing of SCM, reflecting the nature of SCM.

AB - Purpose– The aim of this paper is to identify ways by which the theorizing of supply chain management (SCM) takes place, with particular attention to complementary theories. SCM suffers as well as benefits from a “conceptual slack”.Design/methodology/approach– The nature of SCM is discussed, and the role and relevance of theorizing is addressed by using key characteristics of “academic scholarship” based on a literature review of SCM and evaluation of application of theory and theory development.Findings– The integrative and multi-layered nature of SCM sets the conditions for “theorizing SCM” that can take place through various forms: theory application, new theoretical combinations and sensitivity to managerial practice. It is pivotal that future research explore further the performative potential of SCM.Research limitations/implications– Research with focus on theory development or using complementary theories to advancing understanding of SCM can benefit from the five building blocks of theorizing SCM proposed in the paper.Practical implications– Theoretical principles in SCM are not only used to describe practical problems but also to “produce the world”; supply chains can be seen as organizational units that act or consummate an action that delivers a particular performance.Originality/value– This paper portrays SCM sensitivity to managerial challenges by moving from borrowing to a more bilateral view on theorizing of SCM, reflecting the nature of SCM.

KW - Research

KW - Supply Chain Management

KW - Theories

KW - Research

KW - Supply Chain Management

KW - Theories

U2 - 10.1108/SCM-06-2015-0228

DO - 10.1108/SCM-06-2015-0228

M3 - Journal article

VL - 20

SP - 574

EP - 586

JO - Supply Chain Management: An International Journal

JF - Supply Chain Management: An International Journal

SN - 1359-8546

IS - 6

ER -