China’s Ideological Spectrum: A Two-dimensional Model of Elite Intellectuals’ Visions

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In contemporary scholarship on Chinese ideological debates, both pro-system Chinese intellectuals and Western-based academics present China’s future as a binary choice between a “China Model” of authoritarian statism and a “Western” vision of democratic liberalism. This article deconstructs this dichotomy by proposing a new heuristic for conceptualizing ideological cleavage. Informed by interviews with twenty-eight leading Chinese intellectuals, the case is made for a two-dimensional spectrum allowing for ideological co-variation, on one axis, between two contending socioeconomic roads of national revival, capitalism and socialism, and on the other axis between paternalism and fraternalism as conflicting ideals for the political system. This model not only resonates with Chinese intellectual history, but also allows us to uncover two crucial ideological tendencies that disappear with the China Model/Western Path dichotomy: (i) the emerging hybrid of Confucian politics and free market economics, and (ii) the tabooed fraternalist-socialist legacy of the 1989 movement.
In contemporary scholarship on Chinese ideological debates, both pro-system Chinese intellectuals and Western-based academics present China’s future as a binary choice between a “China Model” of authoritarian statism and a “Western” vision of democratic liberalism. This article deconstructs this dichotomy by proposing a new heuristic for conceptualizing ideological cleavage. Informed by interviews with twenty-eight leading Chinese intellectuals, the case is made for a two-dimensional spectrum allowing for ideological co-variation, on one axis, between two contending socioeconomic roads of national revival, capitalism and socialism, and on the other axis between paternalism and fraternalism as conflicting ideals for the political system. This model not only resonates with Chinese intellectual history, but also allows us to uncover two crucial ideological tendencies that disappear with the China Model/Western Path dichotomy: (i) the emerging hybrid of Confucian politics and free market economics, and (ii) the tabooed fraternalist-socialist legacy of the 1989 movement.
LanguageEnglish
JournalTheory and Society
Volume47
Issue number5
Pages635–661
Number of pages27
ISSN0304-2421
DOIs
StatePublished - 2018

Keywords

  • Capitalist development
  • China’s new left
  • Chinese liberalism
  • Democratization
  • Socialism
  • The China model

Cite this

@article{c53d6e741798462fb05ef8ad3c81829e,
title = "China’s Ideological Spectrum: A Two-dimensional Model of Elite Intellectuals’ Visions",
abstract = "In contemporary scholarship on Chinese ideological debates, both pro-system Chinese intellectuals and Western-based academics present China’s future as a binary choice between a “China Model” of authoritarian statism and a “Western” vision of democratic liberalism. This article deconstructs this dichotomy by proposing a new heuristic for conceptualizing ideological cleavage. Informed by interviews with twenty-eight leading Chinese intellectuals, the case is made for a two-dimensional spectrum allowing for ideological co-variation, on one axis, between two contending socioeconomic roads of national revival, capitalism and socialism, and on the other axis between paternalism and fraternalism as conflicting ideals for the political system. This model not only resonates with Chinese intellectual history, but also allows us to uncover two crucial ideological tendencies that disappear with the China Model/Western Path dichotomy: (i) the emerging hybrid of Confucian politics and free market economics, and (ii) the tabooed fraternalist-socialist legacy of the 1989 movement.",
keywords = "Capitalist development, China’s new left, Chinese liberalism, Democratization, Socialism, The China model, Capitalist development, China’s new left, Chinese liberalism, Democratization, Socialism, The China model",
author = "Mulvad, {Andreas M{\o}ller}",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1007/s11186-018-9326-6",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "635–661",
journal = "Theory and Society",
issn = "0304-2421",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "5",

}

China’s Ideological Spectrum : A Two-dimensional Model of Elite Intellectuals’ Visions. / Mulvad, Andreas Møller.

In: Theory and Society, Vol. 47, No. 5, 2018, p. 635–661.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - China’s Ideological Spectrum

T2 - Theory and Society

AU - Mulvad,Andreas Møller

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - In contemporary scholarship on Chinese ideological debates, both pro-system Chinese intellectuals and Western-based academics present China’s future as a binary choice between a “China Model” of authoritarian statism and a “Western” vision of democratic liberalism. This article deconstructs this dichotomy by proposing a new heuristic for conceptualizing ideological cleavage. Informed by interviews with twenty-eight leading Chinese intellectuals, the case is made for a two-dimensional spectrum allowing for ideological co-variation, on one axis, between two contending socioeconomic roads of national revival, capitalism and socialism, and on the other axis between paternalism and fraternalism as conflicting ideals for the political system. This model not only resonates with Chinese intellectual history, but also allows us to uncover two crucial ideological tendencies that disappear with the China Model/Western Path dichotomy: (i) the emerging hybrid of Confucian politics and free market economics, and (ii) the tabooed fraternalist-socialist legacy of the 1989 movement.

AB - In contemporary scholarship on Chinese ideological debates, both pro-system Chinese intellectuals and Western-based academics present China’s future as a binary choice between a “China Model” of authoritarian statism and a “Western” vision of democratic liberalism. This article deconstructs this dichotomy by proposing a new heuristic for conceptualizing ideological cleavage. Informed by interviews with twenty-eight leading Chinese intellectuals, the case is made for a two-dimensional spectrum allowing for ideological co-variation, on one axis, between two contending socioeconomic roads of national revival, capitalism and socialism, and on the other axis between paternalism and fraternalism as conflicting ideals for the political system. This model not only resonates with Chinese intellectual history, but also allows us to uncover two crucial ideological tendencies that disappear with the China Model/Western Path dichotomy: (i) the emerging hybrid of Confucian politics and free market economics, and (ii) the tabooed fraternalist-socialist legacy of the 1989 movement.

KW - Capitalist development

KW - China’s new left

KW - Chinese liberalism

KW - Democratization

KW - Socialism

KW - The China model

KW - Capitalist development

KW - China’s new left

KW - Chinese liberalism

KW - Democratization

KW - Socialism

KW - The China model

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954925511436&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1007/s11186-018-9326-6

DO - 10.1007/s11186-018-9326-6

M3 - Journal article

VL - 47

SP - 635

EP - 661

JO - Theory and Society

JF - Theory and Society

SN - 0304-2421

IS - 5

ER -