Check Verbraucherpolitik und Verbraucherbeteiligung: Empfehlungen für eine evidenzbasierte Verbraucherpolitik

Kornelia Hagen, Hans-W. Micklitz, Andreas Oehler, Lucia Reisch, Christoph Strünck

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    The paper discusses the opportunities for an empirically grounded decision support system as an instrument for independent and scientifically based consumer policy consulting. To date, consumer policy is dominated by the information paradigm and the leitbild of the rational, sovereign and information-seeking consumer. Yet, both everyday practice and research in behavioural economics show that this view lacks empirical ground. In fact, there are different consumer types and different forms of rationalities at work. Effective consumer policy making should be based on the empirically revealed behaviour of consumers, not on an ideal model. Moreover, it is often not clear how much consumer policy measures actually contribute to the consumer interest, and whether there would be more effective and efficient policy instruments to strengthen the consumer position. The authors suggest introducing an empirically based “Check Consumer Policy and Consumer Participation” as a systematic decision and evaluation tool for policy makers. This check should be independent from the government and should be grounded on an empirical view of the consumer. Consumer policy tools should be tested with real consumers. The authors suggest an independent national “Expert Council for Consumer Policy” as an ideal candidate to supervise this work.
    The paper discusses the opportunities for an empirically grounded decision support system as an instrument for independent and scientifically based consumer policy consulting. To date, consumer policy is dominated by the information paradigm and the leitbild of the rational, sovereign and information-seeking consumer. Yet, both everyday practice and research in behavioural economics show that this view lacks empirical ground. In fact, there are different consumer types and different forms of rationalities at work. Effective consumer policy making should be based on the empirically revealed behaviour of consumers, not on an ideal model. Moreover, it is often not clear how much consumer policy measures actually contribute to the consumer interest, and whether there would be more effective and efficient policy instruments to strengthen the consumer position. The authors suggest introducing an empirically based “Check Consumer Policy and Consumer Participation” as a systematic decision and evaluation tool for policy makers. This check should be independent from the government and should be grounded on an empirical view of the consumer. Consumer policy tools should be tested with real consumers. The authors suggest an independent national “Expert Council for Consumer Policy” as an ideal candidate to supervise this work.
    LanguageGerman
    JournalJournal fuer Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit
    Volume8
    Issue number1-2
    Pages61-66
    ISSN1661-5751
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jun 2013

    Keywords

      Cite this

      @article{6e682ac7fb8c48e8bbaf74ef79f72596,
      title = "Check Verbraucherpolitik und Verbraucherbeteiligung: Empfehlungen f{\"u}r eine evidenzbasierte Verbraucherpolitik",
      abstract = "The paper discusses the opportunities for an empirically grounded decision support system as an instrument for independent and scientifically based consumer policy consulting. To date, consumer policy is dominated by the information paradigm and the leitbild of the rational, sovereign and information-seeking consumer. Yet, both everyday practice and research in behavioural economics show that this view lacks empirical ground. In fact, there are different consumer types and different forms of rationalities at work. Effective consumer policy making should be based on the empirically revealed behaviour of consumers, not on an ideal model. Moreover, it is often not clear how much consumer policy measures actually contribute to the consumer interest, and whether there would be more effective and efficient policy instruments to strengthen the consumer position. The authors suggest introducing an empirically based “Check Consumer Policy and Consumer Participation” as a systematic decision and evaluation tool for policy makers. This check should be independent from the government and should be grounded on an empirical view of the consumer. Consumer policy tools should be tested with real consumers. The authors suggest an independent national “Expert Council for Consumer Policy” as an ideal candidate to supervise this work.",
      keywords = "Evidenzbasierte Politik, Evidence based policy, Folgenabsch{\"a}tzung, Impact assessment, Verbraucherpolitik, Consumer policy, Verbraucherbeteiligung, Consumer participation",
      author = "Kornelia Hagen and Hans-W. Micklitz and Andreas Oehler and Lucia Reisch and Christoph Str{\"u}nck",
      year = "2013",
      month = "6",
      doi = "10.1007/s00003-012-0800-1",
      language = "Tysk",
      volume = "8",
      pages = "61--66",
      journal = "Journal fuer Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit",
      issn = "1661-5751",
      publisher = "Springer",
      number = "1-2",

      }

      Check Verbraucherpolitik und Verbraucherbeteiligung : Empfehlungen für eine evidenzbasierte Verbraucherpolitik. / Hagen, Kornelia; Micklitz, Hans-W.; Oehler, Andreas; Reisch, Lucia; Strünck, Christoph.

      In: Journal fuer Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit, Vol. 8, No. 1-2, 06.2013, p. 61-66 .

      Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

      TY - JOUR

      T1 - Check Verbraucherpolitik und Verbraucherbeteiligung

      T2 - Journal fuer Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit

      AU - Hagen,Kornelia

      AU - Micklitz, Hans-W.

      AU - Oehler,Andreas

      AU - Reisch,Lucia

      AU - Strünck,Christoph

      PY - 2013/6

      Y1 - 2013/6

      N2 - The paper discusses the opportunities for an empirically grounded decision support system as an instrument for independent and scientifically based consumer policy consulting. To date, consumer policy is dominated by the information paradigm and the leitbild of the rational, sovereign and information-seeking consumer. Yet, both everyday practice and research in behavioural economics show that this view lacks empirical ground. In fact, there are different consumer types and different forms of rationalities at work. Effective consumer policy making should be based on the empirically revealed behaviour of consumers, not on an ideal model. Moreover, it is often not clear how much consumer policy measures actually contribute to the consumer interest, and whether there would be more effective and efficient policy instruments to strengthen the consumer position. The authors suggest introducing an empirically based “Check Consumer Policy and Consumer Participation” as a systematic decision and evaluation tool for policy makers. This check should be independent from the government and should be grounded on an empirical view of the consumer. Consumer policy tools should be tested with real consumers. The authors suggest an independent national “Expert Council for Consumer Policy” as an ideal candidate to supervise this work.

      AB - The paper discusses the opportunities for an empirically grounded decision support system as an instrument for independent and scientifically based consumer policy consulting. To date, consumer policy is dominated by the information paradigm and the leitbild of the rational, sovereign and information-seeking consumer. Yet, both everyday practice and research in behavioural economics show that this view lacks empirical ground. In fact, there are different consumer types and different forms of rationalities at work. Effective consumer policy making should be based on the empirically revealed behaviour of consumers, not on an ideal model. Moreover, it is often not clear how much consumer policy measures actually contribute to the consumer interest, and whether there would be more effective and efficient policy instruments to strengthen the consumer position. The authors suggest introducing an empirically based “Check Consumer Policy and Consumer Participation” as a systematic decision and evaluation tool for policy makers. This check should be independent from the government and should be grounded on an empirical view of the consumer. Consumer policy tools should be tested with real consumers. The authors suggest an independent national “Expert Council for Consumer Policy” as an ideal candidate to supervise this work.

      KW - Evidenzbasierte Politik

      KW - Evidence based policy

      KW - Folgenabschätzung

      KW - Impact assessment

      KW - Verbraucherpolitik

      KW - Consumer policy

      KW - Verbraucherbeteiligung

      KW - Consumer participation

      U2 - 10.1007/s00003-012-0800-1

      DO - 10.1007/s00003-012-0800-1

      M3 - Tidsskriftartikel

      VL - 8

      SP - 61

      EP - 66

      JO - Journal fuer Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit

      JF - Journal fuer Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit

      SN - 1661-5751

      IS - 1-2

      ER -