Careers, Connections and Corruption Risks in Europe

Nicholas Charron, Carl Dahlström, Mihály Fazekas, Victor Lapuente

    Research output: Working paperResearch

    Abstract

    Why do officials in some countries favor entrenched contractors while others assign public con-tracts more impartially? According to the research, such variation responds to differences in politi-cal institutions, economic development and historical preconditions. This paper instead emphasizes the interplay between politics and bureaucracy. It suggests that corruption risks are minimized when the two groups involved in decision-making on public contracts—politicians and bureau-crats—have known different interests. This is institutionalized when politicians are accountable to the electorate, while bureaucrats are accountable to their peers, and not to politicians. We test this hypothesis with a novel experience-based measure of career incentives in the public sector— utiliz-ing a survey with over 85,000 individuals in 212 European regions—and a new objective corrup-tion-risk measure including over 1.4 million procurement contracts. Both show a remarkable sub-national variation across Europe. The study finds corruption risks significantly lower where bureau-crats’ careers do not depend on political connections.
    Original languageEnglish
    Place of PublicationGöteborg
    PublisherGöteborg Universitet
    Number of pages42
    Publication statusPublished - 2015
    SeriesQOG Working Paper
    Number2015:6
    ISSN1653-8919

    Cite this

    Charron, N., Dahlström, C., Fazekas, M., & Lapuente, V. (2015). Careers, Connections and Corruption Risks in Europe. Göteborg Universitet. QOG Working Paper, No. 2015:6 http://qog.pol.gu.se/digitalAssets/1526/1526038_2015_6_charron_dahlstr--m_fazekas_lapuente.pdf