Can I Trust Your Findings? Ruling Out Alternative Explanations in International Business Research

Alvaro Cuervo-Cazurra, Ulf Andersson, Mary Yoko Brannen, Bo Bernhard Nielsen, A. Rebecca Reuber

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    The complex nature of international business research, with its cross-country and multilevel nature, complicates the empirical identification of relationships among theoretical constructs. The objective of this editorial is to provide guidance to help international business scholars navigate this complexity and ensure that readers can trust their findings. We provide suggestions for how to rule out alternative explanations, explaining key considerations not only in empirical analyses, but also in theory building and in research design. Our discussion covers both qualitative and quantitative studies, because we believe that it is imperative to understand how trustworthiness is established in both traditions, even for international business researchers who self-identify with only one. This enables scholars to have a broader scope of knowledge when interpreting past research in the field and to be more adept at explaining their design choices to a diverse audience.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalJournal of International Business Studies
    Volume47
    Issue number8
    Pages (from-to)881–897
    Number of pages17
    ISSN0047-2506
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Keywords

    • Theory-method intersection
    • Qualitative/quantitative comparisons
    • Reliability
    • Case theoretic approaches
    • Controls
    • International business

    Cite this

    Cuervo-Cazurra, Alvaro ; Andersson, Ulf ; Yoko Brannen, Mary ; Nielsen, Bo Bernhard ; Reuber, A. Rebecca. / Can I Trust Your Findings? Ruling Out Alternative Explanations in International Business Research. In: Journal of International Business Studies. 2016 ; Vol. 47, No. 8. pp. 881–897.
    @article{7b1cd091932144f281c2433aec7969b9,
    title = "Can I Trust Your Findings?: Ruling Out Alternative Explanations in International Business Research",
    abstract = "The complex nature of international business research, with its cross-country and multilevel nature, complicates the empirical identification of relationships among theoretical constructs. The objective of this editorial is to provide guidance to help international business scholars navigate this complexity and ensure that readers can trust their findings. We provide suggestions for how to rule out alternative explanations, explaining key considerations not only in empirical analyses, but also in theory building and in research design. Our discussion covers both qualitative and quantitative studies, because we believe that it is imperative to understand how trustworthiness is established in both traditions, even for international business researchers who self-identify with only one. This enables scholars to have a broader scope of knowledge when interpreting past research in the field and to be more adept at explaining their design choices to a diverse audience.",
    keywords = "Theory-method intersection, Qualitative/quantitative comparisons, Reliability, Case theoretic approaches, Controls, International business, Theory-method intersection, Qualitative/quantitative comparisons, Reliability, Case theoretic approaches, Controls, International business",
    author = "Alvaro Cuervo-Cazurra and Ulf Andersson and {Yoko Brannen}, Mary and Nielsen, {Bo Bernhard} and Reuber, {A. Rebecca}",
    year = "2016",
    doi = "10.1057/s41267-016-0005-4",
    language = "English",
    volume = "47",
    pages = "881–897",
    journal = "Journal of International Business Studies",
    issn = "0047-2506",
    publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.",
    number = "8",

    }

    Can I Trust Your Findings? Ruling Out Alternative Explanations in International Business Research. / Cuervo-Cazurra, Alvaro; Andersson, Ulf; Yoko Brannen, Mary; Nielsen, Bo Bernhard; Reuber, A. Rebecca.

    In: Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 47, No. 8, 2016, p. 881–897.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Can I Trust Your Findings?

    T2 - Ruling Out Alternative Explanations in International Business Research

    AU - Cuervo-Cazurra, Alvaro

    AU - Andersson, Ulf

    AU - Yoko Brannen, Mary

    AU - Nielsen, Bo Bernhard

    AU - Reuber, A. Rebecca

    PY - 2016

    Y1 - 2016

    N2 - The complex nature of international business research, with its cross-country and multilevel nature, complicates the empirical identification of relationships among theoretical constructs. The objective of this editorial is to provide guidance to help international business scholars navigate this complexity and ensure that readers can trust their findings. We provide suggestions for how to rule out alternative explanations, explaining key considerations not only in empirical analyses, but also in theory building and in research design. Our discussion covers both qualitative and quantitative studies, because we believe that it is imperative to understand how trustworthiness is established in both traditions, even for international business researchers who self-identify with only one. This enables scholars to have a broader scope of knowledge when interpreting past research in the field and to be more adept at explaining their design choices to a diverse audience.

    AB - The complex nature of international business research, with its cross-country and multilevel nature, complicates the empirical identification of relationships among theoretical constructs. The objective of this editorial is to provide guidance to help international business scholars navigate this complexity and ensure that readers can trust their findings. We provide suggestions for how to rule out alternative explanations, explaining key considerations not only in empirical analyses, but also in theory building and in research design. Our discussion covers both qualitative and quantitative studies, because we believe that it is imperative to understand how trustworthiness is established in both traditions, even for international business researchers who self-identify with only one. This enables scholars to have a broader scope of knowledge when interpreting past research in the field and to be more adept at explaining their design choices to a diverse audience.

    KW - Theory-method intersection

    KW - Qualitative/quantitative comparisons

    KW - Reliability

    KW - Case theoretic approaches

    KW - Controls

    KW - International business

    KW - Theory-method intersection

    KW - Qualitative/quantitative comparisons

    KW - Reliability

    KW - Case theoretic approaches

    KW - Controls

    KW - International business

    UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954921364516&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

    U2 - 10.1057/s41267-016-0005-4

    DO - 10.1057/s41267-016-0005-4

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 47

    SP - 881

    EP - 897

    JO - Journal of International Business Studies

    JF - Journal of International Business Studies

    SN - 0047-2506

    IS - 8

    ER -