C. S. Peirce's Complementary and Transdisciplinary Conception of Science and Religion

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    C. S. Peirce was very mathematical, logical and empirical in the foundations of his thinking and he saw no principal limits to the knowledge obtainable by science. But the transdisciplinary view he developed differs substantially from the unity science of logical positivism in that he worked reflectively with metaphysics and the problem of universals furthermore he took a phenomenological point of departure not a pure empiricist one. Thus in his unity of sciences and humanities it is semiotics that is the model science which united all the others. He did not rule out metaphysics and a concept of God from his transdisciplinary view, but worked reflectively with both. The concept of God is a very vague hypothesis about the origin and development of the universe the meaning of which science will have to uncover.
    C. S. Peirce was very mathematical, logical and empirical in the foundations of his thinking and he saw no principal limits to the knowledge obtainable by science. But the transdisciplinary view he developed differs substantially from the unity science of logical positivism in that he worked reflectively with metaphysics and the problem of universals furthermore he took a phenomenological point of departure not a pure empiricist one. Thus in his unity of sciences and humanities it is semiotics that is the model science which united all the others. He did not rule out metaphysics and a concept of God from his transdisciplinary view, but worked reflectively with both. The concept of God is a very vague hypothesis about the origin and development of the universe the meaning of which science will have to uncover.
    LanguageEnglish
    JournalCybernetics & Human Knowing - A Journal of Second Order Cybernetics, Autopoiesis and Cyber-Semiotics
    Volume19
    Issue number1-2
    Pages59-94
    Number of pages36
    ISSN0907-0877
    StatePublished - 2012

    Cite this

    @article{ef14283eb86d4c8594445ed37f8e6bb9,
    title = "C. S. Peirce's Complementary and Transdisciplinary Conception of Science and Religion",
    abstract = "C. S. Peirce was very mathematical, logical and empirical in the foundations of his thinking and he saw no principal limits to the knowledge obtainable by science. But the transdisciplinary view he developed differs substantially from the unity science of logical positivism in that he worked reflectively with metaphysics and the problem of universals furthermore he took a phenomenological point of departure not a pure empiricist one. Thus in his unity of sciences and humanities it is semiotics that is the model science which united all the others. He did not rule out metaphysics and a concept of God from his transdisciplinary view, but worked reflectively with both. The concept of God is a very vague hypothesis about the origin and development of the universe the meaning of which science will have to uncover.",
    author = "S{\o}ren Brier",
    year = "2012",
    language = "English",
    volume = "19",
    pages = "59--94",
    journal = "Cybernetics & Human Knowing - A Journal of Second Order Cybernetics, Autopoiesis and Cyber-Semiotics",
    issn = "0907-0877",
    publisher = "Imprint Academic",
    number = "1-2",

    }

    C. S. Peirce's Complementary and Transdisciplinary Conception of Science and Religion. / Brier, Søren.

    In: Cybernetics & Human Knowing - A Journal of Second Order Cybernetics, Autopoiesis and Cyber-Semiotics, Vol. 19, No. 1-2, 2012, p. 59-94.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - C. S. Peirce's Complementary and Transdisciplinary Conception of Science and Religion

    AU - Brier,Søren

    PY - 2012

    Y1 - 2012

    N2 - C. S. Peirce was very mathematical, logical and empirical in the foundations of his thinking and he saw no principal limits to the knowledge obtainable by science. But the transdisciplinary view he developed differs substantially from the unity science of logical positivism in that he worked reflectively with metaphysics and the problem of universals furthermore he took a phenomenological point of departure not a pure empiricist one. Thus in his unity of sciences and humanities it is semiotics that is the model science which united all the others. He did not rule out metaphysics and a concept of God from his transdisciplinary view, but worked reflectively with both. The concept of God is a very vague hypothesis about the origin and development of the universe the meaning of which science will have to uncover.

    AB - C. S. Peirce was very mathematical, logical and empirical in the foundations of his thinking and he saw no principal limits to the knowledge obtainable by science. But the transdisciplinary view he developed differs substantially from the unity science of logical positivism in that he worked reflectively with metaphysics and the problem of universals furthermore he took a phenomenological point of departure not a pure empiricist one. Thus in his unity of sciences and humanities it is semiotics that is the model science which united all the others. He did not rule out metaphysics and a concept of God from his transdisciplinary view, but worked reflectively with both. The concept of God is a very vague hypothesis about the origin and development of the universe the meaning of which science will have to uncover.

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 19

    SP - 59

    EP - 94

    JO - Cybernetics & Human Knowing - A Journal of Second Order Cybernetics, Autopoiesis and Cyber-Semiotics

    T2 - Cybernetics & Human Knowing - A Journal of Second Order Cybernetics, Autopoiesis and Cyber-Semiotics

    JF - Cybernetics & Human Knowing - A Journal of Second Order Cybernetics, Autopoiesis and Cyber-Semiotics

    SN - 0907-0877

    IS - 1-2

    ER -