Bureaucracy and Innovation Revisited: An Ethnography of Innovation Hiding in Coercive Bureaucracies

Mia Koss Hartmann, Rasmus Koss Hartmann

Research output: Working paperResearch

Abstract

One of the most enduring ideas in organization science is that bureaucracy stifles innovation. This is widely documented, as are numerous moderating factors that produce exceptions to the pattern.
This paper reconsiders how bureaucracy shapes innovation, not by focusing on exceptions, but by problematizing the relationship directly. Inspired by prior ethnographic studies of coercive bureaucracies and theories of secrecy and hiding behavior, we propose that coercive bureaucracies do not necessarily impede innovation, but rather create the appearance of doing so. Coercive bureaucracies create expectations of epistemic boundaries and these expectations lead to both innovation and innovation hiding, which interact to produce low levels of overt innovation. We make this argument based on three years of full-time in-depth ethnographic field studies in two police units and two military units, supplemented by innovation histories, surveys and expert evaluations.
This argument implies that future research examines more deeply the organizational processes and practices by which innovation might occur even in coercive bureaucracies. Further, it encourages innovation research methods that rely less on distant and manager-centered metrics and more on in-depth and up-close empirical approaches.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationCambridge, Mass.
PublisherMIT Sloan School of Management
Number of pages60
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Sep 2017
SeriesMIT Sloan School of Management Working Paper
Number5150-15

Keywords

  • Bureaucracy
  • Innovation
  • Innovation hiding
  • Ethnography
  • Mixed methods

Cite this

Hartmann, M. K., & Koss Hartmann, R. (2017). Bureaucracy and Innovation Revisited: An Ethnography of Innovation Hiding in Coercive Bureaucracies. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Sloan School of Management. MIT Sloan School of Management Working Paper, No. 5150-15 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2699355
Hartmann, Mia Koss ; Koss Hartmann, Rasmus. / Bureaucracy and Innovation Revisited : An Ethnography of Innovation Hiding in Coercive Bureaucracies. Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Sloan School of Management, 2017. (MIT Sloan School of Management Working Paper; No. 5150-15).
@techreport{e2c34e9aac6848e5b401f3540721ff5b,
title = "Bureaucracy and Innovation Revisited: An Ethnography of Innovation Hiding in Coercive Bureaucracies",
abstract = "One of the most enduring ideas in organization science is that bureaucracy stifles innovation. This is widely documented, as are numerous moderating factors that produce exceptions to the pattern. This paper reconsiders how bureaucracy shapes innovation, not by focusing on exceptions, but by problematizing the relationship directly. Inspired by prior ethnographic studies of coercive bureaucracies and theories of secrecy and hiding behavior, we propose that coercive bureaucracies do not necessarily impede innovation, but rather create the appearance of doing so. Coercive bureaucracies create expectations of epistemic boundaries and these expectations lead to both innovation and innovation hiding, which interact to produce low levels of overt innovation. We make this argument based on three years of full-time in-depth ethnographic field studies in two police units and two military units, supplemented by innovation histories, surveys and expert evaluations. This argument implies that future research examines more deeply the organizational processes and practices by which innovation might occur even in coercive bureaucracies. Further, it encourages innovation research methods that rely less on distant and manager-centered metrics and more on in-depth and up-close empirical approaches.",
keywords = "Bureaucracy, Innovation, Innovation hiding, Ethnography, Mixed methods, Bureaucracy, Innovation, Innovation hiding, Ethnography, Mixed methods",
author = "Hartmann, {Mia Koss} and {Koss Hartmann}, Rasmus",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "14",
doi = "10.2139/ssrn.2699355",
language = "English",
series = "MIT Sloan School of Management Working Paper",
publisher = "MIT Sloan School of Management",
number = "5150-15",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "MIT Sloan School of Management",

}

Bureaucracy and Innovation Revisited : An Ethnography of Innovation Hiding in Coercive Bureaucracies. / Hartmann, Mia Koss; Koss Hartmann, Rasmus.

Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Sloan School of Management, 2017.

Research output: Working paperResearch

TY - UNPB

T1 - Bureaucracy and Innovation Revisited

T2 - An Ethnography of Innovation Hiding in Coercive Bureaucracies

AU - Hartmann, Mia Koss

AU - Koss Hartmann, Rasmus

PY - 2017/9/14

Y1 - 2017/9/14

N2 - One of the most enduring ideas in organization science is that bureaucracy stifles innovation. This is widely documented, as are numerous moderating factors that produce exceptions to the pattern. This paper reconsiders how bureaucracy shapes innovation, not by focusing on exceptions, but by problematizing the relationship directly. Inspired by prior ethnographic studies of coercive bureaucracies and theories of secrecy and hiding behavior, we propose that coercive bureaucracies do not necessarily impede innovation, but rather create the appearance of doing so. Coercive bureaucracies create expectations of epistemic boundaries and these expectations lead to both innovation and innovation hiding, which interact to produce low levels of overt innovation. We make this argument based on three years of full-time in-depth ethnographic field studies in two police units and two military units, supplemented by innovation histories, surveys and expert evaluations. This argument implies that future research examines more deeply the organizational processes and practices by which innovation might occur even in coercive bureaucracies. Further, it encourages innovation research methods that rely less on distant and manager-centered metrics and more on in-depth and up-close empirical approaches.

AB - One of the most enduring ideas in organization science is that bureaucracy stifles innovation. This is widely documented, as are numerous moderating factors that produce exceptions to the pattern. This paper reconsiders how bureaucracy shapes innovation, not by focusing on exceptions, but by problematizing the relationship directly. Inspired by prior ethnographic studies of coercive bureaucracies and theories of secrecy and hiding behavior, we propose that coercive bureaucracies do not necessarily impede innovation, but rather create the appearance of doing so. Coercive bureaucracies create expectations of epistemic boundaries and these expectations lead to both innovation and innovation hiding, which interact to produce low levels of overt innovation. We make this argument based on three years of full-time in-depth ethnographic field studies in two police units and two military units, supplemented by innovation histories, surveys and expert evaluations. This argument implies that future research examines more deeply the organizational processes and practices by which innovation might occur even in coercive bureaucracies. Further, it encourages innovation research methods that rely less on distant and manager-centered metrics and more on in-depth and up-close empirical approaches.

KW - Bureaucracy

KW - Innovation

KW - Innovation hiding

KW - Ethnography

KW - Mixed methods

KW - Bureaucracy

KW - Innovation

KW - Innovation hiding

KW - Ethnography

KW - Mixed methods

U2 - 10.2139/ssrn.2699355

DO - 10.2139/ssrn.2699355

M3 - Working paper

T3 - MIT Sloan School of Management Working Paper

BT - Bureaucracy and Innovation Revisited

PB - MIT Sloan School of Management

CY - Cambridge, Mass.

ER -