Building with Wildlife: Project Geographies and Cosmopolitics in Infrastructure Construction

Daniel Sage, Andrew Dainty, Kjell Tryggestad, Lise Justesen, Jan Mouritsen

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Across many construction projects, and especially infrastructure projects, efforts to mitigate potential loss of biodiversity and habitat are significant concerns, and at times politically controversial. And yet, thus far, very little research has addressed the interplay of humans and animals within construction projects. Instead those interested in the politics and ethics of human–animal relations, or animal studies, have arguably focused far more on more stable and contained sites, whether organizations like zoos, farms or laboratories, or other places like homes and parks. These largely ethnographic studies inevitably perhaps downplay the unplanned, unexpected and highly politically and ethically charged, collision of hitherto rather separate human and animal geographies. Yet it is often within such colliding spaces, where animal geographies are unexpectedly found at the heart of human projects, that we formulate our respect and response to both animals and indeed other humans. We develop an examination of such encounters, with conceptual reference to actor-network theory, and documented empirically through case studies of two infrastructure projects; the findings of our research are relevant to both construction project management and future animal studies.
Original languageEnglish
JournalConstruction Management and Economics
Volume32
Issue number7/8
Pages (from-to)773-786
Number of pages14
ISSN0144-6193
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Cite this

@article{db13024c5ba1488ab05c90f4291c6ffe,
title = "Building with Wildlife: Project Geographies and Cosmopolitics in Infrastructure Construction",
abstract = "Across many construction projects, and especially infrastructure projects, efforts to mitigate potential loss of biodiversity and habitat are significant concerns, and at times politically controversial. And yet, thus far, very little research has addressed the interplay of humans and animals within construction projects. Instead those interested in the politics and ethics of human–animal relations, or animal studies, have arguably focused far more on more stable and contained sites, whether organizations like zoos, farms or laboratories, or other places like homes and parks. These largely ethnographic studies inevitably perhaps downplay the unplanned, unexpected and highly politically and ethically charged, collision of hitherto rather separate human and animal geographies. Yet it is often within such colliding spaces, where animal geographies are unexpectedly found at the heart of human projects, that we formulate our respect and response to both animals and indeed other humans. We develop an examination of such encounters, with conceptual reference to actor-network theory, and documented empirically through case studies of two infrastructure projects; the findings of our research are relevant to both construction project management and future animal studies.",
keywords = "Actor\-network theory, Environmental Impact Assessment, Human–animal geographies, Infrastructure",
author = "Daniel Sage and Andrew Dainty and Kjell Tryggestad and Lise Justesen and Jan Mouritsen",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1080/01446193.2014.911933",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "773--786",
journal = "Construction Management and Economics",
issn = "0144-6193",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "7/8",

}

Building with Wildlife : Project Geographies and Cosmopolitics in Infrastructure Construction. / Sage, Daniel; Dainty, Andrew; Tryggestad, Kjell; Justesen, Lise; Mouritsen, Jan.

In: Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 32, No. 7/8, 2014, p. 773-786.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Building with Wildlife

T2 - Project Geographies and Cosmopolitics in Infrastructure Construction

AU - Sage, Daniel

AU - Dainty, Andrew

AU - Tryggestad, Kjell

AU - Justesen, Lise

AU - Mouritsen, Jan

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Across many construction projects, and especially infrastructure projects, efforts to mitigate potential loss of biodiversity and habitat are significant concerns, and at times politically controversial. And yet, thus far, very little research has addressed the interplay of humans and animals within construction projects. Instead those interested in the politics and ethics of human–animal relations, or animal studies, have arguably focused far more on more stable and contained sites, whether organizations like zoos, farms or laboratories, or other places like homes and parks. These largely ethnographic studies inevitably perhaps downplay the unplanned, unexpected and highly politically and ethically charged, collision of hitherto rather separate human and animal geographies. Yet it is often within such colliding spaces, where animal geographies are unexpectedly found at the heart of human projects, that we formulate our respect and response to both animals and indeed other humans. We develop an examination of such encounters, with conceptual reference to actor-network theory, and documented empirically through case studies of two infrastructure projects; the findings of our research are relevant to both construction project management and future animal studies.

AB - Across many construction projects, and especially infrastructure projects, efforts to mitigate potential loss of biodiversity and habitat are significant concerns, and at times politically controversial. And yet, thus far, very little research has addressed the interplay of humans and animals within construction projects. Instead those interested in the politics and ethics of human–animal relations, or animal studies, have arguably focused far more on more stable and contained sites, whether organizations like zoos, farms or laboratories, or other places like homes and parks. These largely ethnographic studies inevitably perhaps downplay the unplanned, unexpected and highly politically and ethically charged, collision of hitherto rather separate human and animal geographies. Yet it is often within such colliding spaces, where animal geographies are unexpectedly found at the heart of human projects, that we formulate our respect and response to both animals and indeed other humans. We develop an examination of such encounters, with conceptual reference to actor-network theory, and documented empirically through case studies of two infrastructure projects; the findings of our research are relevant to both construction project management and future animal studies.

KW - Actor\-network theory

KW - Environmental Impact Assessment

KW - Human–animal geographies

KW - Infrastructure

U2 - 10.1080/01446193.2014.911933

DO - 10.1080/01446193.2014.911933

M3 - Journal article

VL - 32

SP - 773

EP - 786

JO - Construction Management and Economics

JF - Construction Management and Economics

SN - 0144-6193

IS - 7/8

ER -