Building Psychological Contracts in Security-Risk Environments: Evidence from Colombia and Mexico

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    470 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This paper examines the reciprocal obligations between employers and employees that are framed as psychological contracts in security-risk environments. A total of 30 interviews based on psychological contract frameworks, duty-of-care strategies in terms of human resource management (HRM) systems and the impacts of narcoterrorism on firms were conducted with human resources (HR) personnel, line managers and subordinates at eight national and multinational corporations (MNCs) with subsidiaries in Colombia and Mexico. Our findings generally support the existence of a relational psychological contract in our sample. Duty-of-care strategies based on both HRM systems and the sensitivities of HR personnel and line managers to the narcoterrorism context, in combination with both explicit and implicit security policies, tend to be the sources of the content of psychological contracts. We propose a psychological contract model based on HRM systems and security and control policy in a narcoterrorism context for the further study of firms' duty-of-care strategies.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalEuropean Journal of International Management
    Volume9
    Issue number6
    Pages (from-to)690-711
    Number of pages22
    ISSN1751-6757
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
      SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

    Keywords

    • Psychological contracts
    • Human resource development
    • HRM
    • Duty of care
    • Narcoterrorism
    • Organised crime
    • Violence
    • Columbia
    • Mexico
    • Secutiry risks
    • Security risk environments
    • Reciprocal obligations
    • Employer obligations
    • Security policies

    Cite this