Brexit and the European Union: Hanging in the Balance?

Mads Dagnis Jensen, Holly Snaith

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

When on 23 June 2016 a majority voted in favour of the United Kingdom (UK) leaving the European Union (EU), it generated a host of unknowns. Prior to the referendum, scholars had already started to anticipate the implications of a potential Brexit from different perspectives, including considering the legal ( Cardwell 2016 ; Łazowski 2016 ; Butler et al. 2016 ), political ( Kroll and Leuffen 2016 ; Oliver 2016 ; Freedman 2016 ) and economic ( Jensen and Snaith 2016 ) implications. After the referendum, studies have begun to address the reasons for the Brexit vote ( Hobolt 2016 ; Clarke et al. 2017 ) and its potential consequences. This chapter will add another piece to the Brexit jigsaw by focusing on the impact upon the EU itself. To do so, it first develops an analytical framework to study the shifts in power that may occur because of Brexit, using an approach that tackles in turn the micro, meso and macro levels of analysis (focussing alternately on changes within the institutions, between the institutions and outside of the institutions). It afterwards outlines a brief introduction to Britain’s historically fractious relationship with the EU as a means of demonstrating where key policy divisions lie and suggesting where Britain’s exit will leave the greatest strategic vacuums. The subsequent analysis centres on the actors that will likely win and lose from the UK’s exit from the Union.
When on 23 June 2016 a majority voted in favour of the United Kingdom (UK) leaving the European Union (EU), it generated a host of unknowns. Prior to the referendum, scholars had already started to anticipate the implications of a potential Brexit from different perspectives, including considering the legal ( Cardwell 2016 ; Łazowski 2016 ; Butler et al. 2016 ), political ( Kroll and Leuffen 2016 ; Oliver 2016 ; Freedman 2016 ) and economic ( Jensen and Snaith 2016 ) implications. After the referendum, studies have begun to address the reasons for the Brexit vote ( Hobolt 2016 ; Clarke et al. 2017 ) and its potential consequences. This chapter will add another piece to the Brexit jigsaw by focusing on the impact upon the EU itself. To do so, it first develops an analytical framework to study the shifts in power that may occur because of Brexit, using an approach that tackles in turn the micro, meso and macro levels of analysis (focussing alternately on changes within the institutions, between the institutions and outside of the institutions). It afterwards outlines a brief introduction to Britain’s historically fractious relationship with the EU as a means of demonstrating where key policy divisions lie and suggesting where Britain’s exit will leave the greatest strategic vacuums. The subsequent analysis centres on the actors that will likely win and lose from the UK’s exit from the Union.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationRoutledge Handbook of the Politics of Brexit
EditorsPatrick Diamond, Peter Nedergaard, Ben Rosamond
Place of PublicationAbingdon
PublisherRoutledge
Date2018
Pages254-265
Chapter21
ISBN (Print)9781138049369
ISBN (Electronic)9781351689489, 9781315169613
DOIs
StatePublished - 2018

Cite this

Jensen, M. D., & Snaith, H. (2018). Brexit and the European Union: Hanging in the Balance? In P. Diamond, P. Nedergaard, & B. Rosamond (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of the Politics of Brexit (pp. 254-265). Abingdon: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315169613-21
Jensen, Mads Dagnis ; Snaith, Holly. / Brexit and the European Union : Hanging in the Balance?. Routledge Handbook of the Politics of Brexit. editor / Patrick Diamond ; Peter Nedergaard ; Ben Rosamond. Abingdon : Routledge, 2018. pp. 254-265
@inbook{07a3a6e5b81e47089e700b9e0cd1530e,
title = "Brexit and the European Union: Hanging in the Balance?",
abstract = "When on 23 June 2016 a majority voted in favour of the United Kingdom (UK) leaving the European Union (EU), it generated a host of unknowns. Prior to the referendum, scholars had already started to anticipate the implications of a potential Brexit from different perspectives, including considering the legal ( Cardwell 2016 ; Łazowski 2016 ; Butler et al. 2016 ), political ( Kroll and Leuffen 2016 ; Oliver 2016 ; Freedman 2016 ) and economic ( Jensen and Snaith 2016 ) implications. After the referendum, studies have begun to address the reasons for the Brexit vote ( Hobolt 2016 ; Clarke et al. 2017 ) and its potential consequences. This chapter will add another piece to the Brexit jigsaw by focusing on the impact upon the EU itself. To do so, it first develops an analytical framework to study the shifts in power that may occur because of Brexit, using an approach that tackles in turn the micro, meso and macro levels of analysis (focussing alternately on changes within the institutions, between the institutions and outside of the institutions). It afterwards outlines a brief introduction to Britain’s historically fractious relationship with the EU as a means of demonstrating where key policy divisions lie and suggesting where Britain’s exit will leave the greatest strategic vacuums. The subsequent analysis centres on the actors that will likely win and lose from the UK’s exit from the Union.",
author = "Jensen, {Mads Dagnis} and Holly Snaith",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.4324/9781315169613-21",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781138049369",
pages = "254--265",
editor = "Patrick Diamond and Peter Nedergaard and Ben Rosamond",
booktitle = "Routledge Handbook of the Politics of Brexit",
publisher = "Routledge",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Jensen, MD & Snaith, H 2018, Brexit and the European Union: Hanging in the Balance? in P Diamond, P Nedergaard & B Rosamond (eds), Routledge Handbook of the Politics of Brexit. Routledge, Abingdon, pp. 254-265. DOI: 10.4324/9781315169613-21

Brexit and the European Union : Hanging in the Balance? / Jensen, Mads Dagnis; Snaith, Holly.

Routledge Handbook of the Politics of Brexit. ed. / Patrick Diamond; Peter Nedergaard; Ben Rosamond. Abingdon : Routledge, 2018. p. 254-265.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Brexit and the European Union

T2 - Hanging in the Balance?

AU - Jensen,Mads Dagnis

AU - Snaith,Holly

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - When on 23 June 2016 a majority voted in favour of the United Kingdom (UK) leaving the European Union (EU), it generated a host of unknowns. Prior to the referendum, scholars had already started to anticipate the implications of a potential Brexit from different perspectives, including considering the legal ( Cardwell 2016 ; Łazowski 2016 ; Butler et al. 2016 ), political ( Kroll and Leuffen 2016 ; Oliver 2016 ; Freedman 2016 ) and economic ( Jensen and Snaith 2016 ) implications. After the referendum, studies have begun to address the reasons for the Brexit vote ( Hobolt 2016 ; Clarke et al. 2017 ) and its potential consequences. This chapter will add another piece to the Brexit jigsaw by focusing on the impact upon the EU itself. To do so, it first develops an analytical framework to study the shifts in power that may occur because of Brexit, using an approach that tackles in turn the micro, meso and macro levels of analysis (focussing alternately on changes within the institutions, between the institutions and outside of the institutions). It afterwards outlines a brief introduction to Britain’s historically fractious relationship with the EU as a means of demonstrating where key policy divisions lie and suggesting where Britain’s exit will leave the greatest strategic vacuums. The subsequent analysis centres on the actors that will likely win and lose from the UK’s exit from the Union.

AB - When on 23 June 2016 a majority voted in favour of the United Kingdom (UK) leaving the European Union (EU), it generated a host of unknowns. Prior to the referendum, scholars had already started to anticipate the implications of a potential Brexit from different perspectives, including considering the legal ( Cardwell 2016 ; Łazowski 2016 ; Butler et al. 2016 ), political ( Kroll and Leuffen 2016 ; Oliver 2016 ; Freedman 2016 ) and economic ( Jensen and Snaith 2016 ) implications. After the referendum, studies have begun to address the reasons for the Brexit vote ( Hobolt 2016 ; Clarke et al. 2017 ) and its potential consequences. This chapter will add another piece to the Brexit jigsaw by focusing on the impact upon the EU itself. To do so, it first develops an analytical framework to study the shifts in power that may occur because of Brexit, using an approach that tackles in turn the micro, meso and macro levels of analysis (focussing alternately on changes within the institutions, between the institutions and outside of the institutions). It afterwards outlines a brief introduction to Britain’s historically fractious relationship with the EU as a means of demonstrating where key policy divisions lie and suggesting where Britain’s exit will leave the greatest strategic vacuums. The subsequent analysis centres on the actors that will likely win and lose from the UK’s exit from the Union.

UR - https://primo.kb.dk/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=CBS01000791714&context=L&vid=CBS&search_scope=Blended&tab=default_tab&lang=en_US

U2 - 10.4324/9781315169613-21

DO - 10.4324/9781315169613-21

M3 - Book chapter

SN - 9781138049369

SP - 254

EP - 265

BT - Routledge Handbook of the Politics of Brexit

PB - Routledge

CY - Abingdon

ER -

Jensen MD, Snaith H. Brexit and the European Union: Hanging in the Balance? In Diamond P, Nedergaard P, Rosamond B, editors, Routledge Handbook of the Politics of Brexit. Abingdon: Routledge. 2018. p. 254-265. Available from, DOI: 10.4324/9781315169613-21